This may only be a partial list of reasons; please, add anything else in the comments. The deadline to file to run for the Board is May 19th. Entire Board Majority NOT vetting the Superintendent in any way, shape or form. Even the Seattle Times thought that was wrong. It was just absolute hubris and it was wrong. For the second time in just over a year , board members voted to negotiate a superintendent contract during a special meeting with no opportunity for public comment. This time, they showed an even deeper disregard for their responsibilities as public servants: Aborting a national search for a new superintendent and denying Interim Superintendent Brent Jones a chance to show students, parents and taxpayers that, indeed, he is the best person for the job. Government bodies can’t fast-forward through transparent processes just because they think they know the right answer. One other odd thing about the hiring of Brent Jones - most permanent SPS superintendent contracts ar
Comments
as a radio journalist, I know that a comfortable rate of speech (for comprehension) is 3 words per second...
3 minutes = 180 seconds x 3 words = 540 words...
If I went, I would bring a record player with me, with a scratched record going round and round, repeating the same phrases over and over again for the full three minutes...
"who do you work for? listen to us... who do you work for? listen to us... put our kids first, listen to us... put our kids first, listen to us... manage the super, listen to us, manage the super, listen to us... uphold your oaths, listen to us, uphold your oaths, listen to us... uphold the laws, listen to us, uphold the laws, listen to us... manage the district, listen to us, manage the district, listen to us... do your jobs, listen to us, do your jobs, listen to us... stop making excuses, listen to us, stop making excuses, listen to us..." etc...
I cannot make the Board meeting tonight and have examined the web site the above link to the sample plan. There seems a lot of room to make the documents more clear and to the point.
I look at the sample referenced in the link above and ask why in this sample would the transportation zone for Adams include areas within the attendance boundaries of Loyal Heights, North Beach and Whittier? This seem to imply that if you are lucky enough to live in areas close to many schools then you can have transportation outside your attendance area. West Woodland is not in the transportation zone as it is in a different middle school area, right? If in fact it is for attendance area students then the light yellow circle should be interrupted as it enters the attendance area of other schools, just as it is when it enters a different middle school attendance area.
Paragraph stating that attendance areas will be include:
Under the new plan the District will identify a Transportation Zone around each attendance area elementary and K-8 school. This Transportation Zone will be generally be limited by a radius of 1.25 miles from the school. The Transportation Zone will extend beyond that range, as necessary, to include all of the school's attendance area and it will be reduced, as necessary, to remain within the school's middle school service area. Yellow bus transportation will be provided to students living within the school's Transportation Zone but outside the school's walk zone. In no case will any school's Transportation Zone include the entire middle school service area. A couple of the schools in the McClure service area will come closest.
At the same time, I'm not under the impression that pointing out budgeting shenanigans will actually do much.
I don't think its because they don't care or don't get it (well most of them anyway), it's just an impossible task for what really is a volunteer role, especially given the challenge of timing for some of these issues (e.g., enrollment deadline pressures).
That said, testify, testify, testify. Some people are listening.
GreyWatch said:
" it's just an impossible task for what really is a volunteer role, especially given the challenge of timing for some of these issues "
NO it is not anywhere close to an impossible task.. ...
These directors for the most part have little interest in the truth or open and transparent processes.
Anyone who believes otherwise needs to pay more attention.
Check out testimonies on 2-2-2011 ..
I agree .. few people testify because it is pointless.
The less than 20 people testifying makes this quite clear .. We had around 15 on 2-2-2011
Whether 20 people or 0 people testify, it makes no difference to this board.
Elect Melissa Westbrook to the Board and you will see the tasks for a Director are not impossible.