The $43-billion spending plan released by Senate GOP leaders would impose a new statewide property tax to pay for education, while eliminating local school district levies to offset the costs to taxpayers.Well, no. I don't know of anyone who supports cutting health and human services for public education. We need NEW revenue.
To help find that money, the GOP plan would reject nearly all of the collective bargaining agreements Gov. Jay Inslee’s office reached with 38 employee unions, and instead award state workers flat raises of $500 per year for the next two years.
The new statewide property tax GOP lawmakers would impose to pay for schools would raise about $1.5 billion over the next two years. At the same time, the GOP schools plan would lower local school district levies by about $800 million statewide each year, leaders said.
The Senate budget would help pay for some of that with other reductions, including:
▪ $109 million in savings from eliminating state contributions to most police and firefighters’ retirement plans;
▪ $60 million by eliminating the Housing and Essential Needs program;
▪ $44 million by limiting who is eligible for state-funded childcare programs;
▪ $33 million by limiting eligibility for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program.
Braun said the cuts affect mainly able-bodied adults who are capable of going back to work. He said the state needs to be smart with taxpayers’ money.
The plan is expected to come up for a vote Thursday on the Senate floor. House Democrats are expected to release a competing budget proposal next week.
Also, Seattle getting fewer ed dollars because we are "property-wealthy" ignores the fact that not everyone is and that this area has very concentrated poverty and other challenges.
And see that list of cuts? I am truly astonished that they are going after police and firefighters but I knew, just like the teachers union, that the GOP would someday take on the police and firefighter unions. Apparently, that day has come.
Lastly, could you be any more Simon Legree than saying that "people who are abled-bodied" and yet have need "temporary family assistance" should tough it out?