Legislatively Speaking
Well, that teacher evaluation law change - the one Arne Duncan was using as something of a blackmail stick - went down with a whimper, not a bang. I attribute this to a couple of things. One, there seemed to be confusion about what the money was for and how much any district actually used (and therefore might lose). Two, Duncan had not given any guarantee for the waiver if the law got changed. That made changing it suspect. Three, as my own state senator, Jamie Pedersen wrote to me: I hope that the federal government will appreciate that we have done significant work in this area and give our system time to bear fruit, rather than denying us the waiver and triggering the unfortunate consequences. This speaks to the idea that Washington State HAS been ahead in a teacher evaluation law and could the DOE give it a chance? Four, the WEA put on a forceful show in Olympia to point out that linking test scores to teacher performance doesn't hav...