Seattle Schools and Later Bell Times

Just wanted to put this up for tonight; some further input from the Retreat and thoughts tomorrow.

Seattle School District presentation on bell times.

Framework timeline for work on bell times.

Board Resolution (not yet adopted) on later bell times.

Comments

Anonymous said…
It's going to take them 2 years to change the bell times? That seems like a very long planning period for something the board considers a priority.

A parent
6/10/14, 6:20 AM
Anonymous said…
Isn't that the resolution they already adopted that made staff do this framework stuff?

Just sayin'
6/10/14, 8:52 AM
Anonymous said…
This is Peaslee's fault. She could have focused her efforts to implement JAMS with a bell time driven by student learning, e.g. 8:15 am, for example. It is a brand new school, she could have pushed for it as a test case. That would have made a major impact on student learning, especially when you consider the geosplit push of kids out of eckstein will disproportionately hit poorer kids. If she had focused on that, having one school out of 10 with a more appropriate bell time would have proven how effective it is as an 'interventional' strategy, and there would have been a building full of teachers to speak unequivocally about the positive, measurable affects. And, parents in the entire district would have become an unstoppable force to demand sensible bell times for student learning. Massive, massive missed opportunity. She harmed her own objective by not doing this. It was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. This is the first new secondary comprehensive SSD has opened in fifty years. She had her chance. Now, all staff will do is say it is too hard. Too difficult. Too complicated. There are union issues. There are civil daylight issues. There are athletic issues. Yada, yada, yada. Ain't going to happen. She could have picked off the low-hanging fruit of JAMS and used that as the wedge to make this happen for all. Pry the staff clam open, into action. Instead, she totally blew it. Director Martin-Mortis did too. This he knew this should happen, and he didn't bother taking this on to make it happen.

Skeptical that it will happen at all. But, it could have. She blew it. Really, really blew it.

Missed opportunity
6/10/14, 9:03 AM
Charlie Mas said…
Two years to change bell times? You believe that?

Let's remember that the Board has made a documented program placement procedure a priority for three years now, and there's no one even working on it.
6/10/14, 9:09 AM
Anonymous said…
When academics need serious boosting in this District, why push bell times as a top priority? If my child sleeps in later, it's still off to school to do CMP math and Readers and Writers Workshop. Maybe history will get covered, or not. Bell times are not a priority for our family.

seriously
6/10/14, 9:41 AM
Anonymous said…
Seriously,

Because bell times affect not only academics but also health & safety. And it is a much cheaper change than textbooks.

Maybe it won't affect your family, but my senior has 3 friends who will not graduate due to sleep related anxiety illnesses and 1 who will not graduate because of a car accident where sleep was a factor. Many more are in therapy or get medical treatment for things where sleep deprivation is a factor, more than are going to kumon for CMP2 therapy. It was shocking to me when we finally got the prize teacher for first period & she told us on curriculum night not to expect our kids to cover the material like her other classes since the kids are too sleepy to learn well.


Significant academic improvement has been documented in districts that moved start times later & the most improvement was seen in the kids who were performing lowest.

sleep-school performance

Also decreased dropout rate, absences, tardies, school discipline, & nurse visits. Had no affect on after-school sports participation rates. But associated with lower sports injury rates & improved athletic performance. Also kids who have more sleep are more efficient & get their homework done faster. Sleep in Fairfax research

And not school related, but decrease in depression & anxiety, decrease in teen car accidents, decrease in teen violent crime, decrease in cold & flu rates, decrease in obesity & sleep disorder rates. Teens Need Sleep Files

-HS Parent
6/10/14, 10:14 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more