Seattle Times "Story" on Superintendents and School Board
Update: And now the Times editorial board weighs in. Yawn. Same old, same old (you'd think they would try a new tack but no.) The Times absolutely refuses to acknowledge the reasons for the turnover in Seattle superintendents. What is the Board to do in the fact of not one but two financial scandals? Keep those superintendents? C'mon. Then they speak of "a curiosity for a change in governance." I hate to break it to them but that "curiosity" is only Tim Burgess, LEV and the Seattle Times. Not in progressive Seattle. And they speak of respect "for staff" as they incessantly berate the Board. Oh kettle, it's the pot calling. End of update. Of all the issues for the Times to cover about Seattle Public Schools, they pick the issue of superintendents working with school boards. This is an old, tired issue that the Times has covered...repeatedly. In fact, it seems their go-to, defacto answer to ANY issue in Seattle...