How Did Testing Go For You?

I am hearing not-so-good experiences about yesterday's SPS testing of students. I saw comments at a Facebook page from parents; I have heard nothing about staff experiences. 

The two themes I heard were long lines and lack of organization. 

Anyone else have a better experience?

Samples:

We are at Hamilton and giving up. kids have been waiting about 45 minutes and only moved half a block. The line is down to Wallingford playfield.

Did a drive by our middle school the line is 3 blocks down!!

Was at McClure and we left. It is crazy busy and unorganized.

I wish they had just sent the tests to our local schools so we could collect them and perform the tests ourselves at home. At least the rain stopped for a bit so maybe people didn't get soaked in the downpours we had today.

We were at their Sunday testing site (South Shore PreK-8 School) yesterday!!! It was a pain, 4 hours in total! Big superspreader event for sure...


Whitman is done. We got in a looooong line at 2pm and were unfortunately turned away after almost an hour wait.

I did the math and assuming that they could complete 1 test per minute at each site, they could only do about 4% of all the SPS kids today. In reality they probably tested far fewer. It's such poor planning/communication to suggest to parents that the tests would be "available" for walk-in at these sites.


Comments

Anonymous said…
I'm really perplexed why the District didn't offer to hand test kits to people in their cars, and create a system for uploading test results. They could also offer in-person testing to those who aren't sure how to use the test kits. If they gave out, for example, 20,000 test kits yesterday, I'm pretty sure they'd have results back for at least 75% (more?) of them the same day. That number would be a lot higher than the number of people who actually got tested yesterday, and it would have minimized the hassle factor for thousands of families. And since at-home tests are so hard to find, it would have provided something really valuable to us all.

Hindsight is 20/20, and I know this was done very quickly, but I see other school districts doing this around the country and I'm betting it worked pretty well. Regardless, thank you to the staff and volunteers to who did their best with the situation Sunday and yesterday.

Tester
Anonymous said…
As staff at a middle school it went pretty well. We had several hours to test. Social distanced in the cafetorium and it took about 5 min to do and 15 min to wait for results.

We just threw away the tests after they were done.

My school was not a testing site. Why not just hand out the tests to people as they waited in line?

This was just thrown together by district over the last few days of break so I don't really blame anyone at the building level. I have no idea what constraints they were under but as usual there seem to be a bit better way of doing things.

Theo Moriarty
Cynthia K said…
The tests were sent in bulk and could not be given out to individuals. Our experience took about an hour.
Anonymous said…
Was it a pain? Absolutely. My kids were freezing. However, it was all pulled together in less than 3 days (when the district got the kits from the Health Dept). It was completely volunteer run. Even school board members and district employees signed up to help (Noel Treat and Mia Williams were 2 names I recognized on the sign up). I don't know how or why middle schools were the chosen test sites, but I cannot imagine they would have had enough volunteers if they had testing at every school. The tests were in bulk-one dropper for multiple tests, so they could not be handed out to families. I really don't know how it could have gone better with the constraints that they had. -Former Teacher
Kate (Belltown) said…
Why was this pulled together in three days? Why is seemingly everything with this district a crisis? We all knew that this was coming, especially with all the holiday travel and gatherings. I cannot understand why this district was unable to plan for return-to-school testing, as apparently many other districts did. Additionally and particularly with the high transmissibility of the omicron variant, there should be on-site testing at every school at least twice a week. I still want to know what SPS did with the covid relief money, since they do not seem to have funds for test kits or for ventilation, etc. Where did that money go?
Anonymous said…
I think the district did an awesome job doing something they are not built to do. Public Health should have increased testing everything that was happening. But they didn't. Kudos to whoever the people were at the district that pulled this together and the hard working volunteers who stepped up to at least give us some options to help our kids (and the teachers and staff who serve them) a safer in their return after the break.

-Rainier Mom
Anonymous said…
I’m a big district critic, but I’ve been pretty appalled how dismissive parents have been about this last minute, all-volunteer effort to administer infectious disease tests. Of course it went poorly, they have no resources! They only got 60k tests from DOH last week! But parents and teachers were getting wound up about the district not providing a means to test. I can’t get behind piling on the district about this, I’ll save that for when the screw up in what’s legit educational services in their wheelhouse.

Anti-Gen
Anonymous said…
Our SPS principal sent an email saying, "We ask that all students have a negative test for COVID-19 before returning to school on Tuesday."

That created a lot of confusion. Was it a requirement? A suggestion? Even possible? The district could be clearer about whether this is required or not.

Clear Communications

Unknown said…
Kudos to SPS. It wasn't perfect, but that they even pulled it off in just a few days its terrific. Testing is planned for all week at the least. Omicron is a crazy fast spreader (like measles). Glad that kids in Seattle have had minimal issues with masking. We are very fortunate to live in Seattle, a highly educated city which has largely followed the science and where the citizens have not politicized public health.

BLUE SKY
Anonymous said…
I don't agree "we are so fortunate" if you understand SPS in context to other districts who received funding and resources, including "blue" cities & states. Tests are not as frequent as elsewhere. Other districts have been testing kids all along prior to this surge. San Diego sent home test kits to all kids prior to the break, plus is testing them upon return. NYC, a much larger and more complex district is "increasing their test & stay program". They are screening kids twice weekly, plus sending kids home with rapid tests if any student in their class tests positive. Would like to see the same action within SPS. All kids should have access to free at home tests if someone in class tests positive. Our state (like CA, Mass, NY etc.) received the same free resources provided by the relief funding. WA state has a program.

Critical
Anonymous said…
Agree w/ Critical:

Seattle is not above politics. We did not follow the science when we kept schools closed last year. We caved to anxious teachers and race baiting. Blue states/cities provided ONE HALF the in-person instruction than red state. I don’t agree with all the mask-free, vaccine fear lingering of red states, that’s just irresponsible. But we failed our kids big time last year. BLUE SKY, we should be ashamed, not smug.

Botched
Anonymous said…
Good points Critical.

The rapid home kits are popular and by word of mouth and people use it so they can socialize at gatherings. The problem is testing for antigen relies on timing and making sure you do it properly so the result is usable. If you think you were exposed, testing too soon before you get a high enough level of antigen for the test measurement, if you were infected, will give you a negative result. You then go to the party or to school, then later assumes it’s the latest gathering that’s the culprit vs. you were already infected. If you were never symptomatic, but infected, you could be spreading it all along.

The thing is normal healthy people should get their vaccinations, practice good preventative measures, and avoid the test mania. Ironically, the people who needs it most are low paid wage earners exposed to the public all day long who can’t afford to buy self testing kit and employers who won’t cover at work testing for them.

We lost track of balancing public health needs vs. individual needs a log time ago. This pandemic is prolonged because of it. It has produced extreme positioning and much of it is due to various competing political interests. I know SPS is dealing with pressure by staff to go on line since the Fall. Students and families OTOH mostly want in person. This tension is reflected in the workplace too. I have family in LA and my nieces and nephews, along with other staff and other students, are tested frequently at their schools since school started in the Fall.

SPS mom
Ultra Viries said…

A staff member drove through difficult conditions to obtain test kits. Thank you.

Inslee wants to keep schools open. Washington state will be spending $50M for
Covid tests. Districts will have access to tests. Washington will benefit from both state and federal efforts regarding test kits.

FDA has approved approximately 400 tests. There are multiple channels to obtain these kits.

The board and district need to take Chris Jackin's advice and start talking about substitutes. Thus far, board meetings have lacked crucial information to keep schools opened.

The board and district need to start purchasing N95 masks for students, too. There are multiple channels to obtain masks.

Anonymous said…
Agree with Botched 100%. In our area we opened bars & restaurants and did not prioritize our children. There was a ton of criticism about this situation so much for a "highly educated" area that follows science. The overwhelming message from medical & educational leaders, researchers, has been how much our kids suffered. I am still reading articles about the outcomes and negative effects of the online environment on our kids in the New York Times. This is the very reason why so many experts are stating they do not support putting kids back online despite Omicron.

critical

Anonymous said…
SPS Mom, I don't know any teachers that want to go back to remote. Certainly not where I teach. Every teacher I know found it intensely exhausting and stressful; I worked a 70-80 hour week for all 9 months. Maybe someone wants this but I can't imagine it.

The idea about "SPS policy" right now is interesting, though. Yes, there are criteria and policies, but when to test kids, where to eat lunch, how to distance, all the actual application seems to be up to individual principals to figure out. Some schools are testing classrooms on a rotating basis, some just on demand. Some eat lunch outside, some in. (The district kindly provided us with a 20x20 foot tent for our 500+ kids to eat under.) Distance while eating varies. Everyone just has to figure it out on their own.

There might be policy on paper, but there is no application in terms of practical support to buildings.

Seattlelifer
Anonymous said…
From the Jan 5th 2022 New York Times Education News Summary

" The C.D.C. has advised schools to avoid quarantines and closures by using a protocol known as test-to-stay, in which close contacts of positive virus cases take two rapid antigen tests in a week; only those who test positive must stay home."

Some districts had this challenge when tests were mailed out:
"But many districts, including Chicago, said they did not have nearly the number of rapid tests they needed. And despite a shortage, the district bungled an effort to test students over winter break. It mailed out roughly 150,000 P.C.R. tests. Most were never returned, and of the 40,000 or so tests that were mailed in, a majority produced invalid results."

SPS parent



Anonymous said…
If we are short on tests, then we should prioritize them. Obviously that should be done based on symptoms. Let’s test the kids and staff with symptoms and quarantine if positive. Pretty basic. Typical Union. Demand tests that don’t exist, and close down (no work for them) if there aren’t any tests. Basic laziness.

Common Sense

Anonymous said…
While I think we all want our kids to stay in school, this will not be likely as Omicron sweeps across our region. Its so highly contagious, that many of our staff and students will be out.

Its better to have remote learning for a couple of weeks to let Omicron pass, with some semblance of an education, than to have students come to school to sit in an auditorium quietly as multiple classes are herded into a single room due to lack of teachers.

Can't blame the district. Its the nature of the virus. And the nature of the pandemic. There already are staffing shortages prior to folks being out sick with Omicron (because of folks choosing to leave the job market - this is not a teacher issue - all sectors of work are affected). Omicron will make it quite challenging for the next few weeks.

BLUE SKY

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Education News Roundup