Roe V Wade Overturned

 Going to just jump right in here because this decision will affect most women (even if you, like me, can no longer have children). 

I should read the opinion(s) but I'd like to keep my breakfast down. 

The course of many girls and young women's lives will change because of this ruling. 

It will FORCE some of them to carry to term, a baby they don't want. 

It will FORCE some to carry a fetus that came from rape or incest. 

It will KILL some either by a young body unable to carry a child OR trying some back alley way to abort the fetus. 

Any girls or young women who think, "Oh, I'll just get a pill for the abortion," ladies, they are coming for that next. 

It will certainly create a cottage industry in any border cities which means - again - some girls/women will die from an abortion by an unqualified person. 

Some girls and women will have to give up their dreams about jobs and college. But here's where women my age come in. If your daughter wants to continue her dream AND is forced to bear a child, then YOU may end up giving up your retirement dreams to help raise that child. YOU may have to work longer to help financially support that child.

Yes, yes, you can always put up a baby for adoption. Who will adopt these millions of babies? Do we have the foster care infrastructure for many more unwanted children?

You know who always gets left out of these discussions - boys and men who impregnant these girls and women. Why is the impact of this decision not felt by them? 

We should demand laws that say that when a girl or woman has a child they are being forced to keep, an immediate DNA test is done. If it's who the girl/woman says it is, then that guy gets his social security number notated and any legal work he does for the next 18 years, first thing out of that paycheck is child support. Always.

Boys and men need to take their responsibility just as girls and women are being forced to. I would urge mothers of sons (and I have sons and they know this) that if they live in your house, they will be paying child support to your grandchild. 

I'm sure some of you believe that abortion is killing a baby. Scientifically and legally, it isn't but yes, extract a clump of living, growing cells from a body and you do kill something. 

But I don't believe because of religious beliefs or any other belief, I have the right to tell any other woman or girl how the course of their life will go for perhaps a one-night mistake.

 I don't believe I have the right to tell a woman she may have to die so the baby will live. I don't believe I have the right to tell a woman with an ectopic pregnancy, she will just have to die because she will not receive treatment for it. 

I especially don't believe I have the right to tell a victim of rape or incest that she has to bear pregnancy and childbirth - two of the most intimate times in a female life - because I say so. 

But that's just me. 

Comments

Disheartened said…
I am with you 100%. This decision will not stand the test of time.


6/24/22, 5:17 PM
Webster said…
How are they supposed to even feed these babies?
6/27/22, 7:53 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more