This and That In Seattle Schools

 Whew! A lot to let you know about.

First up, there's a rumor that JoLynn Berge, the head of budgeting in Seattle Schools, is on her way out. It's unknown if she is leaving on her own or being pushed out. 

Next, SPS settles with former Cleveland High School principal, Catherine Brown, who crossed swords with the district over COVID information to her community. SPS didn't want her saying one thing and she did anyone (she says in service to her community and the community seems to have backed up her decision). She is to receive $205,056 and resigned from SPS. She accepted the settlement, agreeing to not trying to sue the district over discrimination and/or retaliation claims. 

One side note to this story is who her lawyer is - Shannon McMinimee. Ms. McMinimee used to work in SPS Legal so she knows the district well. I see her name often in cases against districts and she seems to be striving to be the leading education lawyer in the region.

I sat in on the Board's new Ad Hoc Committee, created in service to their Student Outcomes Focused Governance (SOFG). I'll have a separate post on this but it - is - astonishing how all in the Board is on this. The amount of work they are creating for themselves and the staff all in service (allegedly) to this initiative is unbelievable. 

This does not include their work on a Board "constitution" nor a "policy diet" initiative. They are also going to define terms like "community," "values,", and more. 

If you have a district-wide issue or school issue that they don't deem part of this work, I think you will be ignored. If they cannot align an issue with this work, apparently it will not matter. 

And FYI, it appears to me that some members of the Board have decided that they don't need to attend meetings in person. Hampson wasn't at this meeting - she's the Chair - because she had no wifi. At least one Board member had kids playing in the background and I think one staffer was in an area where there were others working because I could hear a guy talking to someone, probably on a phone. One member was further away from her mic so you had to turn up the volume and another was too close and you had to turn down the volume. I'm not sure they get that these are public meetings and they owe it to the community for the public to be able to hear them clearly. The need for this kind of remote meeting was understandable at the height of COVID but now it just looks a lot like a convenience for those involved.

Know a young adult looking for a paid internship? Here's a great one from the King County League of Women Voters.

FYI, the district's waitlists for schools dissolve on Wednesday, August 31st. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
I mean, if the Board stuck to its *main job* of overseeing education spending and not tryna fix every social ill under the sun, they could do their job. You just know that some huge financial scandal will hit after the Board has delegated all their oversight and all of Seattle will be like

BUT WHY
8/5/22, 4:24 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more