Abandon Hope All Ye in Seattle Schools

And by hope, I mean the ability to have even one ounce of influence in the direction of the district or conveying any issues to the Board. After yesterday's Work Session on the budget, it is clear:

  • that decisions are being made behind the scenes AND will be presented as a fait accompli to parents
  • that Director Michelle Sarju is not fully engaged with the work of the Board (not saying she isn't doing anything - she's just not engaging with the work to the level all the other members are). She was reading something on her computer nearly the entire time. When the camera was on her area, you never saw her look at any speaker. She had NO comments on anything. It was bizarre.
  • that you have a near-constant coming and going at JSCEE. They finally have a CFO - Dr. Kurt Buttleman (also named as an assistant superintendent) but now they are losing the guy who figures out how bad the budget deficit will be (he is retiring). Buttleman did say one funny thing which was to tell the Board members to come to him or Jones if they needed to talk. Under Board policy and SOFG, the Board is NOT to go directly to any staff.
  • that there are non-advertised, behind-the-scenes meetings with staff/Board members and community groups. Community engagement is being strictly controlled.
  • that Director Chandra Hampson simply talks too long. Yesterday, I would bet she talked as long as the Superintendent talked, including some out-of-place story about her kids winning their Little League championship. 
  • that Superintendent Brent Jones continues to kinda bad-mouth previous superintendents and boards by always saying how his team is doing deep-dive work never done before on budgeting. 
  • that the Board is gonna be a sorry place without Director Leslie Harris who was the only director to truly lay out the situation AND acknowledge the good and the bad. 
  • that NO ONE on staff or on the Board wants to talk about closure and consolidation of schools in any real way. I do find this somewhat cowardly because they know what will happen when they FINALLY do get around to it. 
  • that Board members are as bad as staff members at managing time at meetings. There really isn't a reason for these meetings to go long if people didn't just ramble on.
  • that the "well-resourced schools" meetings were actually budget meetings but parents may not have got that from them.  Why ask parents about their own schools when the district is trying to understand what parents value in general?
  • that the Superintendent may have wanted directors to talk on and the meeting go long but they never went over the timeline in any real way.
  • that Jones first said things would be better by '25-26' and yet one slide shows they will have a $129M hole.
  • that the October Work Session on Budget is going to be wild as they (hopefully) get more specifics.

 

Notable comments


Hampson

She mentioned “staying away from line items” in the budget and I think she means things like WHS music and probably BHS Biotech.

“It may mean goodbye to very special things but we have to stay focused on goals and guardrails.” She said it would be “a difficult conversation to have with our owners - they want it all (as we all do).” (Note: "owners = parents and public which is SOFG speak.)

Hampson claimed Hersey is “committed to a level of community engagement around the budget but we are not where we need to be.” She referenced some app that Tacoma SD is using.

I looked up the app and it's called Compass. It does look like a good way for parents to track what is happening in classes (including if your kid was late), conferences, events and letting the office know when your child will be out for the day.

She also said something kinda ironic about how "having tunnel vision about things that have a lower impact on reducing the deficit." My mind immediately went to the closures. Closing buildings has costs and so the amount saved won't be that great. But, as I have said before, perhaps leasing the buildings will bring in revenue for some net gain.

Also to put out there on closures and consolidations. Parents, think of the newest teachers (not new to your school but to the profession) at your school. They will be the first ones displaced for more senior teachers at closing schools.

As well, all these mega elementaries? Each will absorb some other school's population which may be further from that neighborhood so some kids will have a longer commute.


Fred Podesta, COO

He was asked about enrollment and said that they are currently within 50 students of where they thought they would be.


Harris

Said she was " surprised not to see spreadsheets with this package and tracking numbers for each budget work session is important if not mandatory.” She said she wanted to see “targeted universalism vis a vis the budget.” She said “people are scared.”


Said she was glad for "the happy talk" but said the district never acknowledged the staff who saw their jobs cuts for this year's budget. She said there was a "disconnect between the pain and the happy talk." She said that "closure and consolidation is coming like a tsunami" and that it was "ugly and violent" last time. And she's right; it was ugly and violent.

Harris pointedly asked if there was going to be an RFP for the legislative lobbyist or was this a permanent hire. Jones seemed off-guard and said there was no perpetual job but they were not sending out an RFP this year.


Rankin

“We’ll be supporting kids in a different way.” A SOFG comment if ever there were one. Plus, her usual rambling. For someone running the meeting, she sure didn't keep it moving.


Song Maritz

Near the very end of the meeting, Director Vivian Song Maritz mentioned not doing right by Special Education students. Jarvis said they have ideas on that and it would be part of the October discussion. I cannot say why she suddently said that.


Deputy Superintendent Art Jarvis (a former superintendent himself)

Jarvis' role yesterday seemed to be the sage on the stage.

He had gone to a small elementary to visit yesterday and said that he appreciated the love that staff and parents had for their school but that those small schools would get fewer and fewer services because of enrollment. He said that SPS will "work to attract students" and be "client-centered and serve them well and retain current students." How's that going so far?

Jarvis, Podesta and Jones all indicated getting the budget leveled would take years. Jarvis said people asked why the district didn't do anything three years ago when they lost 1700 students. He said that they "didn't know the students weren't coming back" nor why they left.

The claim was also made that the Legislature knew that SPS had solved its problems on its own for this year. That seemed to be some sort of pride of ownership for senior leadership.



Big News

Apparently Hampson, Rankin and Song Maritz are working on “a fiscal policy” for the Board. Hampson knew she was going to be asked about it but didn’t have it pulled up and rambled about what it was and then contradicted herself. So all I can tell you is that there are two policies to it.

She said something about staff not being able to talk to her about the policy but to give Board staff input. I didn’t understand that.

Harris said she was "beyond thrilled with it" but where was it on the Board Work Plan? She also said it should have been attached to this meeting's agenda with a big DRAFT watermark. She said she thought some of it was "revolutionary" and the public should see it.

Hampson says this policy exists nowhere else and the need for “this level of clarity for this level of work, whatever Board forms after November.” It sounded like she wanted to say that the next Board could not undo this if voted in before that new Board came in because then that work would then belong with the Superintendent.

Rankin demurred on Harris’ request and Director Lisa Rivera smith asked if they could give the draft out. Rankin finally said it did come in an email from Hampson which makes it public. I immediately wrote and asked for it. When I receive it, I'll put it up here.

Comments

Anonymous said…
So Hampson wants to do away with policies in favor of SOFG, but first, while the district is financially imploding, is writing some Secret Policy That Is Somehow Voteproof and Immortal. Everyone says the Board has no power but she looks drunk on it to me.

Eyeroll
Transparency/ Communication Needed said…
The district no longer attaches WSS formulas to school budgets. It is safe to say that "well resourced" supports are unknown to the public.
Anonymous said…
Thanks - any talk about the small high schools?
Anonymous said…
I sure hope the Ballard Biotech Academy is not on the chopping block. Our son was in that program some years ago and it was a good fit for him. The students in that cohort were very focused and he is still friends with them years later.

These programs are what keep families engaged with SPS. They are popular but probably SPS finds them elitist. That would fit with their obsession with equity over excellence.

Look at the Maritime Academy, also at BHS. We need more workers desperately to manage our ferry systems. SPS should have several apprenticeship programs like this at more high schools. Why don’t they expand more of these programs to attract families to SPS?

District Watcher
Anonymous, next time a name/moniker, please.

There was no talk about small high schools.

District Watcher, nothing specific was said but that business about "line items" and "It may mean goodbye to very special things..." from both Rankin and Hampson makes me think one-off programs are in danger.

A reader sent me a link at SPS' website, CTE Programs Areas & Pathways. I will say that the district has slowly created more and more of these pathways. That's great.

But it's an odd list that leaves off RBHS's aerospace program and it looks like Ingraham's auto shop class is gone (but I see automotive services at WSHS and Washington MS.) Oddly, Washington MS is the only middle school listed with CTE classes at this webpage.

https://www.seattleschools.org/departments/cte/cte-programs-and-courses/
Unknown said…
BioTech was a bastion of privileged kids, keeping them from mixing with the general student population in core classes and guaranteeing them a GPA bump in ELA and Social Studies back when honors did that and was tracked. It was classic white parent social engineering.

It was also the root of the Supreme Court case back in the early 00s--a case that pitted antiracism against special education status in ways that the district is echoing today.

Glad it's gone

SP
Anonymous said…
SP, we need families of middle to upper income levels in SPS too. The district cannot just be for students of color or those with special needs. It should attract families of all backgrounds and many of them will want honors programs for their children. What seems like privilege to you might seem like good parenting to others.

The Ballard Biotech academy was recommended to us by a teacher at Ballard. My son in the program was challenged and engaged in these classes, which was what we wanted for him.

To attract more students and not lose them to other neighborhoods or private schools, SPS needs better curricula and a focus on academics over equity. The district needs every family it can get.

District Watcher
Anonymous said…
SP

These programs are following the students leaving SPS. What cold comfort that “the elitists” have finally gone. Too bad the district needed them to keep the funding lights on.

Womp Womp
@SP said…
You are certainly unaware that our schools are meant to educate students.

Bio Tech- and other academies- are meant to send kids on career paths. A high school in West Seattle has academies, as well.

No one ever wants to talk about kids that are not willing to put time and energy into their studies.

Our entire society benefits from those with STEM backgrounds. The next time you need a CAT scan to diagnose- or treat-...or the fact that millions of lives were saved from the development of Covid vaccines...you can think about your ridiculous statement.

There are teachers that believe students have the capacity to learn, as well.
@SP said…
Your comment also reflects the fact that you probably don't acknowledge that there are childhood genetic diseases that result in death, or terribly disabling neurological diseases such as Huntington Corea that have no treatment options.

Please. It is time for the conversation to shift.
Anonymous said…
Oh god please stop pushing the racist BS, parents wanting rigor is not racist.

Split it
Anonymous said…
I'm sure SP is just as excited about school closures as they are about programs like Biotech disappearing. That's what happens when you tell folks that there is nothing for them in SPS. They leave.


- been there, done that.
Anonymous said…
Oh wow! A Supreme Court case “pitted antracism against special education”???? Huh? Please elucidate! Anybody? I don’t recall any such case involving Ballard HS and special education. The only thing I know about involving Ballard hs is the racially based school choice and assignment which bit the weenie at the Supreme Court level. Currently the district is feigning racial salvation by screwing over sped students and killing off Access. The district claims teacher ratios are racist (insert eyeroll) for special Ed only (insert multiple winks). They would never claim any other teacher ratios were racist, because obviously they are not. But it’s a good way to cut costs for students they don’t think matter.

-Elephant
SP, how was Biotech "tracked?" I thought anyone could take it. And no, it was not at the heart of the Supreme Court case. The enrollment plan was the heart of it and based on Magnolia/Queen Anne students having a hard time getting into BHS.

District Watcher, I, for one, think the district could do BOTH academics and equity. But it seems they don't think that is a worthy proposition.

The district has improved access to CTE programs in all corners of the district. There is no reason to get rid of BioTech.
"It was also the root of the Supreme Court case back in the early 00s--a case that pitted antiracism against special education status in ways that the district is echoing today."

This is NOT true. That SCOTUS case had nothing to do with Special Education. Not one news story says that nor none of the legal proceedings. I don't want to see this kind of misinformation again.
Anonymous said…
“Because racism”, such a tried and true accountability shield. We can’t have xyz. “Because racism”. Test scores suck, especially for black students? “Because racism”. No cool variety in class or pathway offerings, like Biotech? “Because racism.” No field trips? “Because racism”. We can’t do special education inclusion? “Because racism.” Even, packaged junk-food breakfasts? “Because racism.” It’s really useful because there’s no end to “Because racism”, it can be trotted out on cue for absolutely any decision no matter how dumb. After all, we’re they’re solving the single issue of our time, according to a previous interim Superintendent. Who could object? Seattle liberals will hold that near and dear to their hearts even as they put their kids in private schools.

Just Because

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Who Is A. J. Crabill (and why should you care)?

Upcoming Seattle School Board Candidate Forum