Incumbents Secure, One Race Overwhelmingly Decided, One a Maybe

 With 20.43% of the vote counted, results for Seattle School Board races:

D1- Liza Rankin - 60.77%, Debbie Carlsen - 38.59%

D2 - Lisa Rivera Smith - 68%, Christina Posten - 31.59%

D3 - Evan Briggs - 51.08%, Ben Gitenstein - 48.45%

D6 - Gina Topp - 86.84%, Maryanne Wood - 12.72%

The candidates who win will take their oath of office at a special board meeting on Wednesday, November 29th. However, even before taking the oath all of them will be at the Washington State Directors Annual Conference starting on November 16th. Interestingly, the night before - on November 15th - there is a Board meeting that looks to be lengthy. I would hope the newly-elected members would attend the entire meeting.

Analysis and Reflection

Clearly, incumbents do well in these races. That's been true for a long time although I remember fondly when the entire business-types majority got ousted many years back. 

And clearly, Lisa Rivera Smith is one of the luckiest candidates ever. She walked into office her first time and only had one challenger this time. 

I think Gina Topp may have broken the old record of Stephan Blanford with her 86%+ showing. I think he was at about 84%. 

As for Briggs and Gitenstein, I am hoping over the next couple of days to see that gap narrow. In the past, we have certainly seen close matches turn as more votes are counted. But if today's count continues (or gets larger) for Briggs, then she will win. 

If Briggs does win, I do wonder about one thing. I wonder what the how long or on what issue before she turns to Rankin (and her handler, Chandra Hampson) and says, "Quit telling me what to think or how to vote." 

Will she be a follower like Michelle Sarju who seems content letting others do the heavy lifting and telling her how to vote? 

From video interviews with Briggs, I didn't see a person staking out her own views but she may surprise us. 

Also to note, Sunday, November 19th is the last community meeting with Director Leslie Harris at High Point Library. Harris has done yeoman's work to have these regular meetings for 8 years. That's what real community engagement looks like.


Comments

Anonymous said…
Hey people, the incumbents are partially responsible for the mess that SPS is in so it's only fitting they have to suffer through the next 4 years. However there is a solution going forward...

Split it
Anonymous said…
Split it.

Uhhhhhhh. And that will help, how? Where does the Equity and AA male centering department go? My guess, not in the south end if you’re thinking a split N-S split. Where would the SOF go? Not sure who wants that. And exactly how would a split be? And how would it happen? What is the procedure for that happening?

Needless to say… we’d be stuck with double (or more) the expensive superintendents and their respective aristocracies.

Far more likely is a state takeover which might be an improvement.

Curious
WenD said…
Good to know that SPS will remain status quo. Get ready for mayoral control in 3 to 5 years.
Unknown said…
Don't split it. Washington should consolidate districts in the I-5 corridor to reduce unnecessary bureaucrats and office denizens.


Splitting is admission that we can't be a unified community. Or it is spite for one's neighbors.

Seattle needs to learn adult levels of compromise.

SP
Anonymous said…
And now begins the mass privatization and mass exodus from Seattle Public Schools. We'll have a two-tier educational system in place going forward. A public system that is essentially Harborview for kids from poor families: free, public, but barebones and only covering the basics; and a widespread private system where everyone else is expected to pay out of pocket to get their kids educated. Champagne corks must have been popping at the Gates Foundation last night.

Doomer
Curious, I wonder how hard Seattle legislators and the Mayor would fight back on that step.
Simply Foul said…
Did anyone see the esteemed President Brandon Hersey's comment on facebook last night? Suffice it to say his language was foul and unbecoming of the person representing Seattle Public Schools.
Which Facebook page? Inquiring minds want to know.
Patrick said…
Simply Foul, no, no I didn't. Looking around on facebook he seems to have a page as board member, several past campaign pages, didn't see anything with any recent posts. Since you brought it up, maybe you could share it? Or post a link, if it's still there?
Anonymous said…
Simply Foul, I don’t see any comment but while you are it, can you see if you can find the guest list for Brandon Hershey’s upcoming wedding? That would shed light on what kind of connections are at work here.

Stalker
Anonymous said…
Dear Newcomers to Seattle,

Mayoral control is NOT a thing in Washington. Cities and counties have no role in schools or school governance. None. Districts are created only by the legislature, and only the legislature can split a district.

In case of bankruptcy, OSPI i.e. Chris Reykdahl appoints a state administrator, but we’re a couple steps away from that.

-Louie Louie
Anonymous said…
I'm both bewildered and depressed with the election results from Seattle. On the one hand, the early returns for City Council would imply that almost city-wide that the motivated voters have rejected the current state of affairs. But then, that same voting group looks at SPS and thinks... yup, I want that crew has clearly charted a smooth course and I want them to keep sailing the ship. It's truly baffling to me.

We got the annual fundraising campaign letter from the school and as I was reading through it noticed that the Alliance4Education is actually the entity collecting the money and apparently retains 6% of every donation to cover a portion of program costs (Their website). I don't feel I need to contribute 6% of whatever donation I might make to go to that particular organization which doesn't seem at all like an organization remotely interested in my child's school. So I checked the not-this-year box and sent it back. I can't wait for next year to learn that the PTA donations will be shared district wide.

Doomer had it right. Anyone who can bolt, will - if they haven't already. If you can't even prop up your school's lagging funding via the PTA without having those funds siphoned off then why even bother? I said in a comment a few days ago, that I'm done. I had hoped a new school board might be elected and steer the district at least away from the worst of the storm. But nope. The only plus is that the fools (and one of their acolytes) that got the district into this mess will be sticking around as the district sinks beneath the waves.

I'm done. No more donations of any kind to district entities. I'll save the money for private enrichment for my kid.

-Seeing Red
Alki Mothership said…
@Doomer, Harborview bare bones, Hu? Never mind it’s a level one trauma center with one of the best burn units on the west coast? If u are referring to their mission - to care for the underserved with dignity … still don’t see the logic in your analogy. To erroneously state that Harborview only covers the basics (when multiple states send patients via life flight to receive life saving care that they otherwise wouldn’t receive at the facilities in their home state) tells me u don’t check facts.. which at that point, for me anyway, lends no merit to your contribution on this matter.
Unknown said…
@Louie Louie--

It's not a legal, open thing. But machine politics, and Seattle is growing up and getting one to rival Eastern cities, machine politics relies on friendships, club memberships, dinners together, UW games together.

The BrentBruceBrandon triumvirate verges on mayoral control.

SP
Anonymous said…
Harborview does a great job at providing the absolute basic minimum of care needed for someone in a crisis. Anyone can show up off the street and get an immediate need attended to in the moment. It's good! But it's not the same thing as the comprehensive, detailed, longer term care provided at private systems and clinics in the city. Harborview is indeed great for trauma care. But it's not where you go if you have cancer, or a chronic illness, or just want to see a PCP.

Our public school system is universal public education -- school for all. Many people are working hard to turn our health care system into that same model: universal health care, Medicare for all.

But under Chandra Hampson, SPS is moving away from that and is instead deliberately ending universal public education. Their goal is to turn our school system into the current American health care system, in which people are expected to get their needs met privately and the public system exists for the most urgent cases. That's not a good thing. If you want that, Alki Mothership, good for you. I don't think there are very many Seattleites who agree with you, at least outside the JSCEE and the SCPTSA.

Doomer
Anonymous said…
Doomer said that SPS would be akin to:

"Harborview for kids from poor families".

SPS could only wish to provide such excellence. Harborview provides world class care, and in some fields, among the top in the country. It's neurosurgery, cardiac arrest work, etc, are known world over. SPS not so much.

Doomer - and no, Harborview is not "providing the absolute basic minimum of care needed for someone in a crisis" - it's actually the best comprehensive care.

Sorry, your analogy just falls flat on this one. Not necessarily disagreeing with your overall message, but your way of making it is just incorrect.

BLUE SKY
Anonymous said…
More than a week after the election, it’s safe to say Director Briggs will be sworn in later this month. Futile were the efforts.

Watching

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Who Is A. J. Crabill (and why should you care)?

Upcoming Seattle School Board Candidate Forum