Does Superintendent Brent Jones Deserve a Raise?

Jones' two-year contract is up and the Board is now negotiating with him to stay on. I have heard no talk of him walking away. There are several issues to consider.

The number one issue is - where would the money come from for a raise? 

Interestingly, at last night's Board meeting, the principals' contract item on the agenda had been pulled. Earlier in the day I had written to the head of Budget, Linda Sebring, and asked her this:

So the PASS contract seems - to me - like a replay of the SEA contract. Meaning, a contract that SPS cannot afford.

I looked at your budget presentation and was surprised to see on the Expenditures by State Activity page, that the principals’ budget had already been gone up from 2022-2023 to 2023-2024 by about $4M.

Now I know that bump up is not all that money going to salaries but for principal supported activities.

As well, the Board voted to negotiate with Superintendent Jones for his contracted salary. If he gets a raise, where are those dollars coming from?

I have not received a reply yet.

To me, it's just another lack of transparency from the district. They KNOW these contracts are coming up so why hasn't this been included in the discussion around well-resourced schools?

The third issue is, of course, does Jones deserve a raise? I would say no especially in light of serious safety concerns. 

Yesterday the district put out a press release about an award from District Administration.com. It's a group that supports superintendents. They announced that Brent Jones had made their list of "DA 100 education influencers." They say:

Seattle Public Schools Superintendent Brent Jones is dedicated to ensuring all students thrive by transforming organizational culture and redesigning preK-12 systems and supports. In his former position as Seattle Public Schools chief equity, partnerships and engagement officer, he developed the district’s strategy for eliminating opportunity gaps and the roadmap for realizing racial equity for students and families.

I would agree that Jones IS very dedicated. It doesn't make him a great superintendent. You'll note they didn't really say any specific idea/program that Jones created. 

I don't think getting an award from a group whose job it is is to support your type of work is something that needs a press release.  (This happened to the Board a couple of boards back from some school board group that was also a dot-com.)

Meanwhile, over in Wenatchee, their superintendent, Kory Kalahar, also with a two-year interim contract, got the permanent job AND declined a raise.  From NewsRadio 560 KPQ:

Notably, Kalahar has turned down a cost of living pay increase in his new contract, which goes into effect Monday. Kalahar was scheduled to receive an Implicit Price Deflator (IPD) wage increase but has declined to accept the increase.

It was Kalahar who inherited a budget shortfall that began in 2022 when there was a misstep during the transition between Gordon and Eagle. Staff failed to identify a reduction in state and federal funding and the district later realized there was a $9 million dollar budgeting error that put the district in a financial hole. 

Kalahar has been at the helm as the district has had to make major cuts, including the closure this year of Columbia Elementary School.

Thoughts? 

Comments

Anonymous said…
No raise. When you are facing down a deficit of this magnitude, collective bargaining in a year (if the district lasts that long) and the long list of failures at SPS including the baffling inability to pitch a plan to do the terrible thing you promised to do, you keep pulling your $350k+ salary and call it good. School superintendents are some of the highest paid salaries for public sector work in the state under PERS. Bro is setting himself up for some serious pension checks.

Nah
Anonymous said…
The most basic job description for a superintendent is to run a financially solvent district that is staffed and operating with desired learning outcomes, safety, and operational effectiveness. This superintendent has not delivered on that.

Much can be said about how this school board tied his hands, but the bottom line is that no raise is merited based on the data we have. Any raise given would be through a non-transparent "pat on the back" process that celebrates dedication. Ironic for a school board so focused on data and outcomes.

Anne
John Nowicki said…
Easy. "NO"

Next question?
No Raise said…
No. Jones strategic plan to target AA males has been a failure. AA males haven’t made the academic strides in reading and math. AND- Jones has driven the district off of a financial cliff.
Anonymous said…
An entire post devoted to nickels and dimes. Considering he is paid below market for a district this size, also irrelevant. He could be the world’s most talented and it would not matter, being sandwiched between a do-nothing board that can’t be bothered to, um, govern, and a legacy admin that can’t be bothered to, um, manage operations.

The BEX committee oversees hundreds of millions in funds annually, and can’t be bothered to post their minutes. Yet, much discussion about using interest earned and leveraging the assets to “lend” to operations. How do you suppose that gets paid back? Or, will the public be stuck in last position, and be asked to backfill the hole in order to “forgive” the loan? Can’t know for sure. At least Liza leaves clues on where to look in her comments, but hard to parse, when all of the focus is on her delivery and rambling.

Dig deeper here, and you will find out the real reason Song and Rivera-Smith noped out. You will learn that it had zero to do with mean people. The sloppiness of residency was a serious issue, but is nothing in comparison with mismanagement of levy funds. But don’t take my word for it. Go look yourselves.

—Control Deficiency
Patrick said…
No. Raises are for people who meet or exceed expectations.

And I don't know how the board can be said to have tied his hands. The board seems to have bent over backwards to let him do anything he wants.
Anonymous said…
What, just dip into the capitol levy to squeeze out one more pay bump to the head of a district that will be bankrupt in a year? The State Auditor would like a word.

Hard No
FrustratedSPSparent said…
Nope. When organizations are in fiscal crisis, the leader must model self-sacrifice by putting the organization’s needs above their own. SPS should take a play from our local university play books. Leaders, faculty, and staff have all taken pay freezes when the budget math didn’t work. Modeling for this crisis response must come from the very top if it is to spread across our fiscally troubled district. One also can’t engage labor unions with integrity when the leaders don’t model appropriate austerity measures.
Anonymous said…
Did he create a deputy superintendent job for Ted Howard? Did he create a new Chief of Staff position? All of these high level administrators cost big bucks. Does he deserve it? I don't really hear a plan from him, it is talk.
NEMom
Anonymous said…
He just created a new Deputy Chief of Staff position with a salary of 130-167k. I think his raise money has already been spent.



Concerned1

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Who Is A. J. Crabill (and why should you care)?