Community Meetings for Closure Schools Announced

 From SPS website:

Each school recommended for closure will have two community meetings. Initial meetings will take place on the dates below. 

  • Sacajawea Elementary – Thursday, Nov. 7, 6-7 p.m. at Sacajawea  
  • Sanislo Elementary – Tuesday, Nov. 12, from 6 to 7 p.m. at Sanislo 
  • Stevens Elementary – Friday, Nov. 15, 6-7 p.m. at Stevens 
  • North Beach Elementary – Monday, Nov. 18, 6-7 p.m. at North Beach 

A districtwide, online meeting will take place on Thursday, Nov. 14, at 6:30 p.m.    

Please note: These are not public hearings. Those will be scheduled in December. These meetings are to support the individual impacted school communities.  

We want to make sure the impacted families have the chance to fully understand the recommendation, ask questions, and share ideas for how we could implement a potential closure and consolidation with care and support. 

SPS will host more engagement opportunities for the broader community.

So I assume the school communities named got the notice sooner than this.  I wonder if that is to discourage outsiders from coming into a public meeting at a public school to listen in. 

I would bet the second meeting for each school - again, not the public hearing - will be in January, either after the Board vote or right before it.

Like it or not, the Board and Superintendent both need to understand the need for information AND being heard from many parents throughout the district. They keep acting like no one else should be interested in the closures but the communities of the schools involved.

From the Times:

The district said the meetings are intended for the school communities that might close next year. It’s an opportunity for parents to get more information about the proposal and share their ideas, according to notes sent by principals to families. It is unclear whether similar meetings are planned for schools that will receive students because of closures.

As the Times points out, what about the receiving schools? Will there be district guidelines about how receiving schools managing the change or is it free-for-all with principals making key choices?

- Does everything about the closed schools go away? Name, mascot, school colors, etc.

- When will new boundary changes come? This will affect students throughout the district.

- When will new transportation changes come? Will also affect students throughout the district.

The district acts like it has a plan for all these but it very much feels like flying by the seat of their pants.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more