MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2:

So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting. 

In a nutshell:

- She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out.

- She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance. 

- She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm

- She also says that the NE schools should coordinate with SCPTSA for these types of meetings. I'll tell you right now - she does NOT ever want an open public forum and SCPTSA would be happy to help her with that.

- Briggs could have said ALL these things as that region's rep and the only original invitee. But no, once again she hides behind Rankin. 

Lastly, Rankin references an online meeting last week for Viewlands and North Beach where STAFF did a presentation and "board members attended as guests to listen." Wonder if that is happening for all eight school communities that may be affected.

She misses the point - parents want to talk to THEIR elected officials. And if she thinks she can't/doesn't have to because of SOFG, she should say that out loud so parents know that right has been taken from them. (I'll bet that Rankin has told Topp to keep to ONLY the board's topics. I'm sure Topp does that but it would also mean limiting questions or saying you can't answer some questions. It hard to look a parent in the face and refuse to answer their question.)

 

Update:

This meeting was canceled by Director Evan Briggs over some nonsense about "disorganization" (it was very well organized) and her personal safety. I know that parents can get loud sometimes but physically attack a director? Nope

To fill in, it was Briggs who wanted Rankin and Sarju there, presumably to hold her hand. I see this a lot in Briggs; I'm not sure she's cut out to be an elected official. 

Apparently Briggs also said that meeting with constituents is NOT part of SOFG. There you have it - a real-life situation playing out with SOFG. None of these board directors ever made clear during their campaigns that they would no longer communicate regularly with constituents or the general public. So to now say that they won't is kinda a bait and switch for voters.

As luck would have it, four of them - the majority of the Board - are up for election again in November 2025. Sarju and Hersey are two of them and have made statements about not running again. The other two are Clark and Mizrahi; we have to wait and see if they decide to run. 

But this SOFG - and all its costs including consultants - needs to go away. It is NOT helping the district or the Board at all. 

end of update

 

 

 Wednesday, November 6th at 7 pm at 

Eckstein Middle School Auditorium

A community engagement meeting with 
Seattle School Board Directors
Evan Briggs, Liza Rankin, and Michelle Sarju. 
 

Oddly, it says this:

Seattle Public Schools District 3 community members (Bryant, Hawthorne Hills, Laurelhurst, Ravenna, Sand Point, University District, View Ridge, Wallingford, Windermere, Wedgwood) are invited to join us.

Odd because:

1) Sarju is from Central region; can't parents from Stevens come and chat her up?

2)  Rankin is from the far NE/NW region.Can't parents from Sacajawea come chat up their director, Liza Rankin? 

Why would three directors only want to talk to certain parents? Is Sarju having one in her district or is Rankin?  

Also odd, "limited in-person capacity?" That's a VERY large auditorium and if you have a mic, you are golden. 

Are they seriously going to turn people away at the door? (If that does happen, please take a photo.)

If you can go in-person, that's the best thing. I doubt you will hear well on a Zoom meeting in a large auditorium.

Accessibility: We will do our best to provide additional access and interpretation if needed. Please contact janekjpark@gmail.com to make a request by noon Monday, Nov. 4.

Limited in-person capacity


Virtual option here:

Join Zoom Meeting

Meeting ID: 990 3322 5890

Comments

Liza Rankin also covers a portion of the North Beach community. She definitely doesn’t want to hear from those families.
Anonymous said…
Why would capacity be limited when the meeting takes place in the auditorium, and why is it that all three directors that are in alignment will be at the meeting? What about directors that aren't in alignment with school closures- where are they?

Something really stinks, and this gives you an idea about how Rankin, Briggs and Sarju operate.

~ Something Stinks!
RH said…
Why do the districts of the directors not overlap with the school zones? For example, I live in District 3 (Wallingford) and my kid goes to Green Lake Elementary school, my districted school. But the school itself is not located within the boundaries of district 3 and so therefore Briggs doesn't represent it? Does that mean that I don't have the right to vote for the director that represents the school that my child goes to? Doesn't make a lot of sense...
You may be looking at an old map. A couple of years ago the Board was legally required to change boundaries. That may be the issue
RH said…
This looks to be the updated map and still, I live in District 3 but Briggs doesn't represent Green Lake Elementary: https://www.seattleschools.org/about/school-board/meet-the-board/district-three/
Anonymous said…
Yeah everyone will be totally focused on schools the day after the election.

Argh
Anonymous said…
I live in district 7 and our elementary school is in district 7, but middle school is in district 5. So, there is not a direct correlation between where you live and the director(s) that represents the region.
Part of Wallingford is in D3 and part D4.That's how your child goes to GL.
Anonymous said…
I read somewhere that SPS cost 8 times more to run than Portland schools. The enrollment and number of buildings seems similar.

Other's money
Anonymous said…
So this was emailed out to a select group? They don’t post a notification anywhere? I can’t find a post on their website but I’m just a lay person
Patrick said…
Meeting with consituents may not be part of Student Outcome Focused Gobbledygook, but it IS part of being an elected official in a representative democracy. If they didn't want to hear from constituents they shouldn't have run for office.
Anonymous said…
@other's money

Not really AFAIK, I saw some thing saying their budget was ~150M but that didn't make sense just given teacher salaries, but wikipedia has them (portland public schools) at 655M for 44000 students (2018-2019), or about 15k per student vs SPS at 1B for 54000 students (2019-2020) or around 18.5k per student. So, more expensive, but not 8x.

Would be interesting to know what makes them cheaper, but it's not a massive difference, could just be cost of living.

Just the facts
Anonymous said…
Who would and would not be permitted to attend a meeting in a public facility?

And, why would the online component of the meeting be cancelled??

Diretors should at least have the decency to return to two board meetings per month.

I guess Brigg's district won't have much of an opportunity to meet with their director.

- Hey
Anonymous said…
I've been to a couple of Topp's community meetings. She makes sure to spend the time listening to constituents, and taking notes from time to time. There is no agenda ahead of time. Usually at least the West Seattle Blog is there as media coverage. From what I have seen she answers to the best of her ability (i.e. not dodging questions).
So we see -in real time in real situation - where SOFG is playing out. I’d be willing to bet that 90%of voters think they should be able to reach out to an elected to ask a question, And that’s what Topp is doing. Sadly, I don’t think there is a way to stop the majority of the Board from using SOFG. You certainly should tell the Board - in any way you can - that you don’t like it. But coming November 2025, I think things will change,
Kyle said…
Wow, watching public officials hide behind bureaucracy especially at a time like this is appalling. Unless these officials change and start regularly meeting with the public I will NOT be voting for their re-election.
Anonymous said…
aren't these meeting required by law or rules?
Anonymous said…
From Brigg's campaign website.

"Any effective movement is built on relationships, and education is a collective effort that requires the active involvement of parents, families, and community partnerships. Community engagement and clear communication are vital for building strong relationships between schools, families, and the broader community, which is why I will advocate for inclusive engagement policies and proactive, transparent communication. Of equal importance is a solid understanding of the job of the school board within the overall structure of the school district. Systems function effectively when everyone understands their role."

She should resign. She clearly doesn't want the job. She just wants parents to understand that they don't have a role.

- recall the board.
Anonymous said…
It seems like part t of the board is breaking laws rules and promises. A recall is the natural next step.
Seattle is Lost said…
Brigg’s comment is appalling! It sounds like she took a page from Hampson’s SOFG page.
There are laws around open public meetings but there is no requirement for board directors to meet with communities after they are elected. The Board got rid of all committee meetings except the two legally required ones.
I thought Briggs was a lightweight from the start and I continue to believe that.
Anonymous said…
@Melissa: I think we have an answer to your question after the last school board election re: Briggs. "If Briggs does win, I do wonder about one thing. I wonder what the how long or on what issue before she turns to Rankin (and her handler, Chandra Hampson) and says, "Quit telling me what to think or how to vote." "

The answer is... never?! I'd say she is exactly who everyone assumed she was when she said she was asked to run by Hampson & Hersey. An ineffectual toady who is totally out of depth. But she did learn to parrot the right words. What a joke. I think Gitenstein has popped up in more local outlets and discussions since he LOST than Briggs has an actual elected official.
- Seeing Red

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Education News Roundup