Uh Oh, Bellevue

 I'll let the Times give you the news:

Money woes put Bellevue School District under state oversight

Bellevue joins eight other districts across Washington that are also under state oversight, and it’s possible more could come. The announcement was made at Thursday’s school board meeting.
The approximately 20,000-student district east of Lake Washington is home to some of the area’s wealthiest people. But in the last couple of years, the community has seen elementary schools close and more than a hundred teachers and staff let go to cut costs.
 
 
The landmark ruling McCleary v. State of Washington, which capped how much money districts could collect from local levies, hurt Bellevue. It’s a property-rich district that relied on local levy funds to provide high-quality teaching. For Bellevue, the cap meant that starting in 2019, the district couldn’t collect as much as it used to from its residents, meaning a loss of $15 million each year.

  “There are so many things that made for a perfect storm for Bellevue, but it’s brewing out there for all of the districts around us,” Bellevue Superintendent Kelly Aramaki said Friday.

Seattle Schools has often complained about the levy cap.


So what happens next?


State law requires that a district request additional state oversight on its fiscal situation when it is unable to produce a balanced budget, including a negative general fund balance, for the current or coming school year.

A fund balance is sometimes thought of as a “rainy-day fund.” Because districts get paid by the state in chunks, a fund balance supplies a district with the “cash on hand” necessary to pay bills at any time during the year.

With Bellevue voluntarily entering binding conditions, the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction and the Puget Sound Educational Service District will meet regularly with the district to collaborate on high-level financial goals.

Additional budget tools will also be available to the district, including liquidating assets and depositing proceeds into the district’s general fund, OSPI spokesperson Katie Hannig said. 

Hannig said OSPI estimates that the current situation at Bellevue will take three school years to fully resolve.

Honestly, I have my suspicions about the state of the SPS rainy day fund.  


One bright spot:

In the most recent legislative session, state legislators passed House Bill 2049, which allows school districts to raise up to $500 more per student through locally funded levies. This will help Bellevue, but Aramaki pointed out that it doesn’t help districts that are property-poor.


Comments

Anonymous said…
Your headline is all wrong. "Way to go, Bellevue!" would be more appropriate. District leadership means having a clear understanding of your finances, making child-centered decisions, and knowing when you need outside help to sustain funding into the future. I imagine getting to this place of voluntarily inviting financial scrutiny has required transparent conversations between superintendent and school board, both of whom show that they understand their accountability to the law and community.

None of that exists in Seattle. Rather than seeing this as a failure, let's see it as a master class in leadership and a pathway that Seattle would be good to go down.

Anne
I admire Bellevue's superintendent and I would agree this shows great leadership.

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Nepotism in Seattle Schools

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools