Friday Open Thread

Remember these? Talk about anything and I will print it. (Naturally, no personal attacks, swearing, racism, etc.) I'll start.

From the West Seattle Blog, their interview with soon-to-be superintendent, Ben Shuldiner.  Highlights:

He says public-school districts have to come to terms with the fact that while “30 or 40 years ago, they had a monopoly … now, there’s so much more choice.” But he says the ultimate way to solve the problem is “just do better at our jobs” – provide a better education. To increase enrollment in Lansing, Shuldiner says, “we made our schools better.”

He says promotion is important, from talking to the media to advertising such as billboards. 

And he says they noticed a trend – parents loved the elementary schools, but were “fearful about the junior highs.” So, he says, “we created a bunch of K-8s” – and that led to less loss between elementary and middle school, because the students would be staying on in schools with which they and their families were already familiar.

On K-8s, I would like to see the data on how many K-8 parents end up sending their student to a traditional middle school. My impression is that there are kids who want new voices and access to more classes/extra-curricular options. 

That said, I do think many parents like K-8s. If SPS would shore up some of their K-8 buildings - like Blaine, like K-8 STEM, like Salmon Bay - more parents might make that choice. 

He hopes to “visit every single school in the first 100 days … walk the halls with the principals, with the kids.” (We were curious how many layers of bureaucracy his district had between the principals and superintendent; apparently as many as there are in Seattle.) Also, “make some decisions quickly,” with a deep dig into the budget. He also mentioned he might even move to “take down some walls (in the administration) building” (he meant that literally).

Does it matter if he sees all schools in the first 100 days? I don't think so; maybe the first six months. 

I'll be interested to see how his latter point on JSCEE plays out.

The Seattle board halved its regular meeting schedule to monthly not long ago, so we asked him about the frequency of board meetings in Lansing: He said they met two or three times a month, and that the Lansing board had more members than the Seattle board. He said the board periodically has “informational study sessions,” something he’d like to bring to Seattle.

Wonder what the difference is between "informational study sessions" and the Board's Work Session. One thing I think should change is that it feels like staff dominates what are the Board's work sessions. Presentations should be brief with lots more time for questions and discussion.

He didn’t say much – voicing general support for “differentiating based on the needs of each child” – except to note that Lansing dramatically increased the rate of students passing AP exams. That, he said, was largely the result of “more AP classes, and we didn’t gatekeep who got into them.

 I'd love to know what gives him faith in differentiation or what he thinks it looks like so that it does work. I note that on HCC Facebook pages, those parents don't feel good about this answer. 

This is back in vogue, we noted, with “the trades” in some cases desperate for workers. Just outside Seattle, we noted, there are now public high schools dedicated to maritime and aviation. Shuldiner said his current district “created Lansing Technical High School,” and noted that Lansing had been “the home of trades” for so long. 

Comments

Stuart J said…
I called Lansing to ask about Hi Cap. The person I talked with at one of the schools said they have after school enrichment. One hour a day, Tues Weds Thurs, for kids identified as gifted. I did not want to take a lot of the person's time, but I was thinking "how does transport work? What can't they do: sports practices, other activities, etc?" And also does this approach limit who can participate?

Maritime and Aviation are very different programs. Maritime is essentially two years, then students go to a separate skills center or community college via Running Start. Aviation is very much a four year school, though increased numbers of students have gone to Running Start from it in recent years.

Maritime has not hit its enrollment goals. The original aim was 50 per grade. Last year, OSPI data shows there were just 26 freshmen, 37 sophs, 30 juniors and 34 seniors, for a total enrollment of 137. The location is not easy to get to for people from around the region, in contrast to Aviation which has solid bus options on Metro. Aviation is consistently over subscribed. There are probably twice as many applicants as spaces.

Anonymous said…
First part of an mail from Eckstein this afternoon. Not the most organized email and strange to see this before any communication from the HS. Will Cristobal be new principal? acting principal? other??

"Hello Eckstein Families:
Please see our Eckstein Weekly News below.

Roosevelt High School is currently operating with all three of their Assistant Principals on leave.

Ms. Cristobal been asked to support our NE region of SPS, and our previous Eckstein students, by supporting Roosevelt High while their Assistant Principals are on leave. Our Eckstein Eagles who have moved onto RHS will be so happy to see a familiar face in Ms. Cristobal. She will be a known and supportive leader to students and families alike...."

Roosie parent
Benjamin Lukoff said…
Looks like the Nathan Hale antisemitism lawsuit has been re-filed in federal court: https://mynorthwest.com/local/threats-slurs-swastikas/4161749
Anonymous said…
After the Meany suit, the Hale suit suggests a pattern of racial favoritism in the district that costs money. I wonder if they will take it seriously if it's a financial liability instead of just an educational and morale liability.
Anonymous said…
Sign me CHG for the liability post, please
Anonymous said…
Maybe because Mr. Shuldiner was picked in a closed process with HYA, that a certain board member had conflicts of interest, there’s no sign of Mr. Shuldiner’s questioning how the hundreds of millions of dollars in capital funds went through the loopholes to do things that didn’t actually help the most for the costs. But I’ll give him a chance for now.

Not long ago, the board approved school closures to make the new mega schools become the Well Resourced Schools (WRS). After a summer of WRS BS, with multiple courses of deluxe word salads prepared by so-called professionals (and I’m not sure how much the bill came up to), the issues disappeared.

The board retroactively gave Superintendent Jones his new contract with raise, and he took it to cover for his no show lame duck tenure.

Where is accountability for the streams of capital funds that were passed through each intro+consent vote with multiple items listed only by the numerical names? The amount of funds that were paid to consultants like the ones that some certain member(s) of the board liked working with and for.

Allegorically speaking, sooner than later, Mr. Shuldiner should realize that he should check the kitchen where all the word salads were prepared while the number of diners have gone down.

The new superintendent’s priority should not be to beef up the marketing with billboards. He is not an injury lawyer. Whatever he does, he better not be trying the social media like Juneau did to embarrass the district.

The sooner he starts looking into the kitchen where the board members privately meet with the chefs, the more people will care to spell his name correctly.

Be an Oversight Champ
Anonymous said…
Can we please get rid of the COVID era no zero, everyone gets at least 50% on missing assignments? It’s pointless and I think most teachers hate it. -FormerTeacher
Anonymous said…
At Ovetsight Champ,

Do you have documentation related to consulting costs?

-Let’s go
Benjamin, that's yet another case that going to cost the district money. Again, a big situation that was left to a principal's judgment; the outcome is not good.

My other question - what the hell is going on at Roosevelt?
It would be nice to ask Shuldiner to explain what was the "choice" that he was referring to. There isn't anything preventing public schools from offering the public genuine educational choices. In fact, SPS used to offer choices not that long ago in the form of Montessori programs in some schools. Offering Montessori, Waldorf, Reggio Emilia or any other education philosophy alternatives within the public school system as an alternative to the glorified tutoring centers that our schools have become would be the best way to convince the parents that schools exist for their children, not the other way around.
JohnS said…
Maritime parent here. The location is poor - they hoped for space closer to the water, so far that hasn't materialized. Still a very new program. The junior/senior year work is mostly at Seattle Maritime Academy in Ballard, another not easily accessible location. The needs are real though - the maritime industries really need people.
JohnS said…
I have a child at Maritime. The location is definitely not great for transit options; the hope was to find a location closer to the water, which has not happened yet. It still has the feel of a program that is trying to figure itself out. The emphasis is definitely on maritime industry careers, which is a valid and needed thing for the region. The junior/senior experience often involves a big chunk of time at Seattle Maritime Academy in Ballard, which is also not an easily accessible destination via transit.
Fielding, what's interesting is that Lansing SD DOES have Montessori schools. And dual language. So those kinds of options are not new to Shuldiner.

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Nepotism in Seattle Schools