Seattle Education Association News, Saturday, October 9, 2026

First up, a letter from (some?) SEA members to the SEA President Ibijoke Idowu. I'll print it all (bold mine). 


An Open Letter to SEA President Ibijoke Idowu: Our Union Deserves Answers

October 9, 2026

Dear SEA President Ibijoke Idowu,

The Seattle Education Association (SEA) belongs to its members. Its legitimacy rests on democratic governance, accountability, transparency, and the trust of the educators it represents.

Today, serious questions remain unanswered about your continued eligibility to serve as president of our union.

We have received information indicating that Seattle Public Schools has issued you a formal notice of discharge, reportedly effective at the end of October 2026.*

Our union's bylaws are not ambiguous about the importance of membership eligibility.

Article II, Section 2.4.1 establishes that active members have the privilege of holding office, subject to other qualifications. Article III, Section 3.1.2 establishes active membership as a qualification for elected officers.

These provisions raise a straightforward question: If your employment with Seattle Public Schools ends, under what provision of the SEA Bylaws would you remain eligible to serve as president?

We recognize that the bylaws also establish procedures governing vacancies and succession. We are asking SEA leadership to explain publicly how those provisions would apply to your circumstances.

On October 9, 2026, SEA members formally requested clarification from SEA and WEA leadership regarding your status and continued eligibility. Members deserve a substantive written response.

These questions arise against the backdrop of a member-initiated presidential recall petition formally submitted to SEA on August 24, 2026. Throughout this process, close to one thousand members have sought clear answers about their rights under the bylaws, the verification of petition signatures, and the procedures governing a recall election.

Too many of those questions remain unresolved.

President Idowu, this is an opportunity to demonstrate the transparency and accountability that union leadership requires.

We ask you to clarify the status and effective date of the reported employment action, explain the basis for your continued eligibility to hold office if your SPS employment ends, and ensure that SEA and WEA provide members with a written interpretation of the applicable bylaws.

We also ask that the member-initiated recall process be administered fairly, consistently, and without retaliation against members exercising their democratic rights.

No elected union officer should be above the governing rules of the organization they were elected to serve.

The Seattle Education Association represents thousands of dedicated educators who work every day to serve Seattle's students and families. They deserve leadership that respects the union's democratic institutions and responds directly to legitimate questions.

This is not simply a question about one individual. It is a question about the integrity of our union.

President Idowu, please answer these questions openly and allow the membership to evaluate the answers.

Our union belongs to its members. Its rules must apply equally to everyone.

SEA Members

*Apparently, if this is true, it is not effective immediately. 

There is also a recall campaign against President Idowu.

Some interesting comments on Reddit:

To note, SCORE (Seattle Caucus of Rank-And-File Educators) is a progressive caucus of SEA.

- So very candidly I voted for Ibi over the previous president of SEA. She is a fighter and I appreciated the energy she brought over previous leadership.

However, I had no idea about the investigation situation she was in. I never considered a scenario where someone would run for SEA leadership while being under investigation during a negotiation year. I own my mistake of not vetting candidates more.

I plan to vote to recall if the opportunity arises primarily because her choice to run for leadership during a negotiation year was incredibly poor judgement and put our contract at risk. I believe the district wouldn’t have been as aggressive with their demands if we had a different person in the position of president.

- Thank you for saying this. I voted for President Idowu too. I also didn’t know about the investigation at the time.

I used to give a thumbs up to SCORE and I even still agree with some of that group’s positions. But things have changed. 

The current SEA leadership is made up of mostly SCORE-aligned people. It’s those people who are making the recall process difficult. It’s the SCORE group who are unresponsive. That’s why my opinion has changed about SCORE. 

To me, it doesn’t seem like they have the best interest of the union at heart. They are elected by members and should be mostly responsive to member requests and emails. Instead, they’re entirely silent when multiple people try to seek clarity on a variety of issues.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Nepotism in Seattle Schools

Update: Following a scandal at Aki Kurose Middle School, apparently the district has pulled the principal, Caine Lowery who leaves Aki for a promotion to Central Office to support/train/guide principals. Hmm. I also note that former Rainier View Elementary principal Anitra Jones, who was removed from that school, still doesn't show up on the staff roster at Rainier Beach High School where it was stated she would be. Where is she? Who knows?  end of update   This is going to be a difficult post to write because it is sad to see what looks like a norm now at JSCEE. The norm I speak of is largely an occurrence with principals as well as JSCEE senior staff. I also know that this is not going to surprise most who works at JSCEE. The norm I'm referring to is the one where some personnel have personal connections within the district that sees them moving between jobs and even getting promoted based on those relationships. In short, nepotism.  This district is risk-adverse wh...
Read more

Kindergarten Sibling Waitlists Explained

Thanks to StepJ who let us know the district had posted a document about the kindergarten sibling waitlists . There are 148 siblings on the waiting lists for schools that are not their attendance area school. There is a fairly even city-wide distribution of siblings who didn't get their sibling assignment with the largest for Kimball at 19 and John Hay at 18. Here's the document summary : "The following chart shows results for non-attendance area K siblings who applied for their sibling’s attendance area school during Open Enrollment. In summary: • 556 non-attendance area K students applied for their older sibling’s school.2 • 73% of these applicants (408 students) were assigned to their sibling’s school. • 27% of these applicants (148 students) are on waiting lists for their sibling’s school. These results are in addition to: • Students assigned to their attendance area school their older sibling attends. • 132 K siblings assigned to the Option School their older si...
Read more