2005-06 Annual Superintendent Evaluation

The School Board has completed the annual Superintendent Performance Evaluation and it is posted to the District web site. If the link doesn't work, here is the URL:

http://www.seattleschools.org/area/board/supersearch.pdf

Comments

Anonymous said…
I agree with much of the assessment but there are two glaring problems.

One, the communications topic. "District communications have been timely, substantive, concise, and well formatted." None of those things as applied to district communications have been done well. I'd give communications a C-/D+.
And no mention of the Board's unhappiness with how Raj carried out Phase II (just that staff had to work a lot on C&C)? They were very unhappy with the way he did not follow their directions on Phase II. It's been cited as the straw that broke the camel's back and yet nothing.
12/12/06, 8:19 AM
Anonymous said…
I errored in saying they didn't mention Phase II. This assessment was from August to August. Also, this assessment is done from the Board's viewpoint which may differ from staff, teachers, parents, etc. I don't believe communications is doing anywhere near a good job.
12/12/06, 1:42 PM
Anonymous said…
Pure Fiction. Would very much like to see Superintendent graded much like our children are. He would not pass.

Did this come out of committee? Which committee?

In what context/where was it on the

District Communication piece would suggest that Boardmembers still do not get it and frankly at this point it has to be a conscious choice not to get it and to face-save.

Is there now a new Public Affairs person after the last gentlemen left and the other person was on leave - did not see it posted on vacancies a while back?

Perhaps a performance audit by Auditor Sontag is in order on the issue specifically of communication.

Does anyone know how to request such an audit?

Is the 2006-07 workplan in fact on the web now? Looked a while back and did not find it - is there a reason that committee mtg. minutes are not on the web? Frankly, find the web and public disclosure elements to be insulting at best and illegal at worst.

Might the new executive committee of Chow, Flynn and Stewart focus on these issues? One can hope.
12/13/06, 5:56 AM
Beth Bakeman said…
Read a funny and accurate comment on the superintendent's evaluation at: Seattlest
12/13/06, 9:28 AM
Melissa Westbrook said…
I thought the Seattest blog was unkind and unfair.
12/13/06, 1:10 PM
Beth Bakeman said…
I get why you might call it "unkind", Mel, but why "unfair"?

The language in that evaluation really doesn't make any sense.
12/13/06, 1:42 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more