School Boards are Dysfunctional

Interesting op-ed in the Times today, Confessions of a Beleaguered School Board Member.

I had expected it to be from a Seattle School Board member and it's a guy on Vashon Island. He touches on concerns I hadn't really considered. I think there is some sub-text to it that I may be missing (he writes it somewhat like a confessional).

Comments

Charlie Mas said…
This article strongly made a point that I have been trying to make for some time now.

School Board are almost completely powerless. All they are supposed to do is set policy, but they have no power to enforce those policies.

We are supposed to influence our districts by discussing and sometimes altering the policies by which our districts are supposedly governed, but there is often no one who knows these policies, much less who makes sure they are enforced. It seems every time we review a policy in our district — discipline, nutrition or curriculum — we find some key element that in practice is ignored.

I asked an administrator if she cared that our discipline policy and our discipline practice were at odds and the response, in essence, was, "Not really." That about sums up the state of things. I know from speaking to other directors and superintendents that we are not alone in this, but it does not excuse us.

The School Board needs to hire a policy enforcement officer, a cop, deputized with the Board's authority to enforce District policy. The enforcement officer should investigate possible policy violations and, upon finding any, implement remedies.

For example, if the District decides to re-classify 900 students from 10th grade to 9th grade in direct violation of the Policy on Promotion/Non-Promotion of high school students, the Policy Enforcement Officer (how I wish I could figure out a clever acronym) would step in, put the students all back into the 10th grade, slap the wrists of the people who tried to push through the mass re-classification and file a report with the Board.

If someone failed to follow the Policy on Community Advisory and Oversight Committees, the PEO would step in and compel them to comply with the policy. I think withholding their pay until they comply would be effective, but I'm sure that other means could also be found.

This would go a long way towards bringing accountability into the school district.
12/13/06, 3:05 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more