Technical Issues Update

 I did receive this email from a reader on the technical issues here:

I deleted the Google ads script node in the source code and that fixed the problem, so it may be due to a Javascript error in the ads script.

You are a more technical person than I am - I do little source code work. So please send me an email with perhaps a step-by-step instruction (I do have someone else working on this but I like to learn new things).

Also Readers, whatever is happening is not allowing comments. Send your comments directly to me:

sss.westbrook@gmail.com

And I can post them.  Thanks!

Comments

Anonymous said…
I've been fiddling around to see if I can diagnose the problem. Basically there is something wrong with the CSS file for your page. CSS is just the Javascript "recipe" for how to lay out a web page, almost all websites have CSS files that do this. If you right-click your blog home page and select View Source, you should be able to confirm your CSS file is listed in the code somewhere pointing to this CSS file: https://www.blogger.com/static/v1/widgets/1529571102-css_bundle_v2.css

In some browsers, you can delete a line of code and see what the effect is, and deleting that line fixes the problem. Deleting that line or "node" in my browser fixes the problem, but that only fixes it on my browser.

I don't see the problem at all in mobile devices, which use CSS differently, so the problem seems to be specific to the CSS that controls how your blog displays on computer desktop browsers.

This all could be due to someone having hacked in and added custom Javascript, but I doubt it. Scenarios like the following seem much more likely, such as...

Maybe there is some conflict between the CSS and some latent script present in text you copied-and-pasted into a post (Microsoft Word often has a lot of invisible script if you paste formatted text). The solution to this problem is to always paste text only, not formatted text.

Maybe there is a problem with Google's many ad scripts. Those scripts usually live in the CSS file too.

Maybe you are using custom CSS (custom Javascript) and don't know it. In your blog's display settings, you can check and see if anything has custom CSS in it. Try deleting any custom CSS you see.

Maybe there is something wrong with the Theme you're using for your blog. Forgive me if I say so, but the theme is outdated anyway, so if this really is the problem, it's a chance to give the blog a needed visual refresh!


I would suggest trying the following. First, reset the theme you're using for the blog to a default theme. https://support.google.com/blogger/answer/1227173?hl=en
If the problem goes away, then the problem was in your old theme. You could then pick a new theme or stick with the default theme. Don't revert to your old theme.

If that doesn't work, try this. First save your last several posts so they're backed up, then try deleting the last several posts one by one and see if the problem is fixed. If deleting one of them fixes the problem, the conflict with the CSS was in that post. The other posts can be reposted or restored, and the offending post can be re-typed using text only to avoid the conflict.

If the problem persists, after these steps, we still know the problem is in the CSS file: https://www.blogger.com/static/v1/widgets/1529571102-css_bundle_v2.css
I don't know how Google/Blogger lets you control that CSS file, or if you can point to another one, or an older one, or none at all. But that file is the crux of the problem. Have a friend, or a teenager who codes, help.

Good luck!
3/16/22, 12:10 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more