Seattle School Board Director Chandra Hampson Loses Case Against the District

 In the category of "no one is surprised," yesterday a terse ruling was put forth by King County Superior Court:

1) Neither the decision of the District set forth in the outcome letter dated August 19, 2021 nor the action of the Seattle School Board at the September 9, 2021 meeting with respect to Director Hampson constitute arbitrary and capricious action subject to reversal by this Court; and 

2) This appeal is dismissed. 

It is SO ORDERED. (caps theirs)

And yet, Director Hampson has chosen to drag this on and she is seeking review by the Court of Appeals. That case was entered yesterday.

She has cost the district money because of HER demand for an investigation stemming from the letter of complaint filed by the two senior staffers.

She has cost the district money by filing her original case against the district's use of a Board policy in the investigation. That now has been dismissed.

She is continuing to cost the district money by appealing this case. 

Know what she could have done instead after the investigation? Gone to the two staffers privately and talked to them and then issue a public statement saying how she understands how her actions undermined the work and professional reputations of the two staffers, that she is sorry, that she has learned from the experience and wants to move on with them in the important work of SPS. 


Comments

Anonymous said…
Not her MO! That would require humility and actual leadership.

Hampson’s worldview is increasingly like many aggrieved Americans who - in spite of their relative privilege, positional authority and prosperity - cast themselves in the role of oppressed. She’s painted herself in a corner with her own flawed narrative.

Happy to see the district prevail in court. This business of reversing Board votes by democratically elected officials is murky, murky waters to be swimming in.

Thanks for reporting.

Mini Trump
4/28/22, 9:00 AM
Anonymous said…
When someone is found to have harassed/intimidated/bullied not one but two Black staffers, refuses to apologize for it, and instead goes to court to get the decision overturned, loses, and files a further appeal, there is a word for that behavior...

Racist.
4/28/22, 9:23 AM
Humility Needed said…
The goal of Hampson's self ordered Investigative report, court filing and appeal is nothing more than an attempt to save her ash. She has costed the district in excess of $120K and continues to run up the bill while students will loose funding.

Hampson's actions are consistent with her governance style. Hampson simply feels entitled and refuses to believe that she is wrong. Here is the problem: Hampson is in a position of authority. I believe her actions are hurting some students- especially when she is forcing the district to spend Operation dollars on her lawsuits.

I'm disappointed that Brandon Hersey nominated Hampson to be VP of the school board knowing the results of the Investigative Report and, now, court response. Board member Rankin goes along while Hampson filed a lawsuit against board members and district.
4/28/22, 10:24 AM
Anonymous said…
I struggle to understand her priorities and her decisions here. Clearly all of her actions related to this situation will ultimately hurt kids by diverting resources and bandwidth.

NE Parent
4/28/22, 10:57 AM
Anonymous said…
With her abysmal record of leadership, and documented record of harm to the school district and to its students, I'd be dumbfounded if she were not (1) recalled, or at the very least (2) resoundingly defeated were she to ever run again.

We need a petition asking for her immediate resignation to help the school district heal. Anyone have the time and energy to spearhead this?

What a catastrophe for Seattle schools and students.

BLUE SKY
5/3/22, 3:47 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more