Seattle PAC Endorses Song But Why?

Update 2:

I am still waiting to hear from Hannah Krieg and/or the PAC The Kids Table to try to get a complete picture. 

It does seem that Ms. Krieg knows people in White's family.Yes, it is interesting that White's consultant, Stephen Paolini, was available for a quote. I rarely can get ahold of these people. 

I do not take exception to him explaining that White herself is Jewish; many married people do not share the same background. 

I do not buy his "Song is getting more money" out of this. She's not. PACs can spend as they like. And, Song is probably keeping her own wise counsel on whether this story will hurt or help her. As always, it WHO can get the vote out in board elections that matters. 

White's husband, Richard Silverstein, like me, has a blog. But he writes in a much more dangerous world than I do. I don't pretend to understand what it means to be a Jew or to be an American Jew but I would think that standing up against Israeli security doesn't exactly endear him to many Jews. He has published in many notable places including the New York Times. I did look at his Twitter account and I'm trying to see where there are"horrifying" tweets. I only went back a couple of months. 

I am surprised to not hear from people here if they think this concern over antisemitism could extend out to other races. Maybe it depends on if this story has legs. 

end of update 

  

Update 1:

From the White campaign on Facebook:

Many of you have likely seen the reporting from The Burner about the fact that a new PAC, The Kids Table, spent $10,000 on a mailer supporting one of the other candidates in the primary for the School Board, District 5. The PAC’s conduct has been an unfortunate distraction the last few days. It may not sound like a lot but $10,000 is a significant amount to spend in the primary for a School Board candidate. 

The School Board D5 campaign is the only campaign in which this PAC has participated and, given the PAC’s goal, it seems clear that they chose this campaign because I have family members who are involved in Palestinian advocacy. There is no other plausible explanation (in the absence of any statement from the PAC itself). 

I will not be bullied out of running for a position for which I am uniquely qualified based on my 20 years of advocacy in our school district , my skills as a lawyer and my community roots. I stand on my record of advocacy on behalf of and as an ally of all children in our schools, especially the most vulnerable.

I hope that our community will unite in denouncing the actions of this PAC which have distracted us from the issues that matter in this primary election. There are 4 candidates who are continuing to campaign for this position in the primary. All of them are worthy of the voters’ consideration. I hope that as you decide who you are going to vote for, you will look at each of our records on the issues that concern the School Board.

One comment at this post says:

The PAC did send out questionnaires to some candidates. 

Some candidates? Why would that be? They were only looking for what in the candidates? White says hers is the ONLY campaign the PAC "has participated in."  

I still hope to hear from the PAC. 

SPS Dad Energy, I cannot print your comment until I verify some points that claim happened. 

 end of update

 

And now a whole Pandora's box of issues has opened for one Seattle board race but could spill over into all of them.

Before I dive in, point of personal privilege. It is possible to see both sides of the Israel/Gaza war as wrong. I believe that.

Hamas is a disgusting organization for what they did on October 7th AND in their long, drawn-out treatment of hostages, both dead and alive. You could point a finger and say, "Hamas started it." Except then I would refer you to the great Billy Joel who aptly sang, "We didn't start the fire. It was always burning since the world's been turning."

But the other side? Oh my. When you have Donald Trump openly saying that children in Gaza are starving (in the face of his friend Netanyahu who says no one is starving in Gaza), something is very wrong.

What has happened now in the Seattle school board races is this.  There is a PAC in Seattle called The Kids Table. Their website is a single page. Here's what they say they want to do (bold mine):

The Kids Table is a new political action committee designed to support pro-Jewish candidates for state and local office in Washington state, and oppose candidates who are complicit or complacent in the face of anti-Jewish hate. We will oppose extremism and illiberalism, spending money in races where we feel we can make a difference, and where we most need allies. Our name speaks to the need for generational change; for new solutions to the oldest problem, and for hard hitting politics that can fight back today and lead tomorrow.

Too many of our elected leaders feel no need for accountability. Meanwhile, a small group of activists have seized upon a simple idea: by capturing local infrastructure in low-turnout elections, they can drag politics further to the extremes. That is going to change, and The Kids Table is going to change it.

Our city councils and school boards should be focused on filling potholes, illiterate students and unsafe communities rather than libelous virtue signaling on foreign affairs. We are done watching the degradation of our essential institutions, and we know you are, too.

Join us at The Kids Table.

Top 5 contributors: Shira Kaufman, Aviad Benzikry, Arielle Sulkin, Murray Lee, 
Don Stark.

New Seattle PAC Advocating Against Antisemitism Spends
$10,000 To Keep Jewish Woman Off School Board

White, a longtime advocate for special education, is running for Seattle School Board in District 5 against veteran school board member and frontrunner Song. Recently, TKT paid $9,700 for the design, printing, and distribution of 10,000 mail pieces promoting Song, according to the PDC

As in accordance with the law, Song said she did not coordinate with the PAC on the mailer: "I didn't know anything about the IE until I got the mailer myself," Song said in a text. Song has "no idea" about the motivations of the PAC, but she did reiterate her support of the Jewish community.  

"I have been vocally speaking out against antisemitism and all forms of discrimination in schools," Song wrote. "I'm a parent to Jewish kids in Seattle Public Schools and the Jewish community in Seattle is diverse."

What is interesting is that the flyer doesn't say anything about anti-Semitism. It's just sings the praises of Song. But from their hard-hitting description of what the PAC wants to do, it's not just that Song has nice attributes.

While TKT did not respond when asked why they support Song over White, her campaign believes that TKT is targeting her for her family's pro-Palestine activism.

I have a query into TKT myself. I'll let you know if I hear from them. I surely hope I do because if they want to talk tough - as their website does appear to do - then they can talk about what candidates they are choosing to support. 

White’s family has a long history of advocating for Palestinian liberation. Her husband, Richard Silverstein, writes a blog called Tikun Olam, that’s “devoted to exposing the excesses of the Israeli national security state.” Silverstein’s work has also appeared at Middle East Eye, Al Jazeera English and Jacobin Magazine. Their son also organizes with pro-Palestinian groups in Seattle.

The Burner also states that the name of Mr. Silverstein's blog - Tikun Olam - means " “repairing the world" which is "actually rooted in a Jewish value."

White’s consultant, Stephen Paolini told The Burner that he can’t think of another reason besides Palestinian advocacy that would prompt TKT to spend such a large sum to box White out of the School Board. She’s Jewish, she’s committed to combating antisemitism in schools, and her far-from-extreme platform stays entirely on-topic, never veering into “libelous virtue signaling on foreign affairs" as TKT put it.

As The Burner points out, Song has a lot of money in her campaign than White.

Here's the kicker sentence (for me) from The Burner:

Now other candidates may have even more incentive to stay quiet about the ongoing genocide in Gaza as to not invite spending from TKT.

But here's the problem. If any forum wants to go to this issue, all they have to do is point to what happened at Nathan Hale High School around anti-semitism. And then ask candidates, "What do you think should be done in a case like this?" or "What do you want to see the next superintendent do in order to not allow situations like this to escalate to a point where a student is in danger?"

Those are valid questions but sadly, I wish they would not be the focus of a school board race.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The PAC did send out questionnaires to some candidates. If Song completed one it is only fair the community gets to see her answers.

--behind the curtain
Anonymous said…
Do you know who got contacted by them? The School Board candidates I’ve asked said they got nothing from them.

—Why Not All?
I do not but I'm trying to find out. It doesn't look good if they don't clarify what they are doing. Because of their website statements, it can't be just on Song's merits.
Anonymous said…
What a mess. I read Janis comment as: this PAC getting involved ONLY with the District 5 race. Sounds like her concerns are legit since her family members are pro-Palestine advocates. They are also Jewish.
I got the mailer that interestingly and inappropriately lists specific names of school PTAs -school names, not individuals. That is against PTA rules. People can endorse candidates as their own selves, PTAs can’t. PTA’s endorsing candidates risk their 501 C 3 status.
I am a central district reasident. I think at this point before casting my vote, I would like to hear from Vivian Song herself. Did she know the focus of the PAC? I imagine she did read about them before accepting $$$.
I would also imagine she knew, being a former PTA leader, what the boundaries are about candidates and endorsements.
Here Vivian, please come and set the record straight so this distraction is no longer and we can move on.

Want To Know
Want to Know, a couple of things.

One, as a former PTA leader myself, you are right about the list on the back side of that mailer. It should NOT list PTAs and then just say "PTA leaders." I'm sure that someone told them that putting in that "PTA leaders" puts them in the clear. I do not think so. I would guess they needed the space but no matter. (Also, which leaders? If I were on the board of one of these PTAs and did NOT support Song, I' would be unhappy.)

Two, let's review what independent PACs are. They are NOT an arm of any campaign and do NOT give money directly to candidates. That is by law. Song may have heard of this group but unless she decided to break the law, she had zero to do with the mailer.

It would be nice if she disavowed it because it is starting to look like a pointed attack on White's family. That's no way to win an election.

Anonymous said…
Oh my goodness, Melissa, you're falling into the trap set for all of us by the Burner story. Somehow Song is the villain of this story even though she had nothing to do with the mailer. PACs can — and do — send out whatever they want for any candidate? Why do you allow these smears against Song but then won't represent the other side of the story?

— SPS Dad Energy


Anonymous said…
Melissa, is there a reason you Song's quote from the Burner isn't enough for you?

"I didn't know anything about the IE until I got the mailer myself," Song said in a text. Song has "no idea" about the motivations of the PAC, but she did reiterate her support of the Jewish community.

"I have been vocally speaking out against antisemitism and all forms of discrimination in schools," Song wrote. "I'm a parent to Jewish kids in Seattle Public Schools and the Jewish community in Seattle is diverse.


What more is expected of her?

—Hate SPS Politics
Anonymous said…
The PAC raised 40k and spent 9k in this race, so clearly not the only race they are involved in. I am guessing the comment you won’t post explains the reason Janis decided to plant this story with her son’s friend Hannah(since her consultant was quoted, it was a conscious campaign decision), but her opponent’s family also has a long history of pro Palestine advocacy so it’s probably not that. Maybe her husband’s pretty horrifying tweets, but nobody knows why the PAC chose this race- they may genuinely prefer Vivian for other reasons.
Want to know, candidates don’t get to decide whether to accept pac money, they don’t accept money at all- the PAC just does it all on their own.

Soda Pop
SPS Dad Energy, I have said NOTHING against Song and in fact, made it clear that she had nothing to do with this.

For me, I think that Song could have said something about the purpose of that PAC versus what their mailer said. They are using whatever sins White's husband has against her. It's a fairly political move and I think Song knows that. That said, nothing about this is Song's fault.

Soda Pop, well, I would like to talk to the folks at TKT about this. I'm waiting for a reply and will be happy to print what they tell me. I will say that despite people being married, it doesn't mean you share all the same views.
Anonymous said…
Melissa, if you don’t have an account the tweets labeled with
“Hateful content” calling all Israelis pigs may not show up for you. I agree people are not their spouse’s but I do wonder if Janis allows this in her home how she will respond to incidents like the antisemitic bullying that happened at Hale.

Soda Pop
Anonymous said…
Soda Pop — What are you talking about? Song is literally the only candidate in any race anywhere that the Kids Table PAC has spent any money on, and the primary is in 4 days. This is 100% public information: https://www.pdc.wa.gov/political-disclosure-reporting-data/browse-search-data/committees/co-2025-37965#expenditures

I’m not sure if you’re purposely misleading people or don’t know any better.

—Do Better
Anonymous said…
They’ve spent 20k of their 40k, 9k of which was in d5. So clearly at least one other race (I have no idea which one, maybe you are better at PDC spelunking) with some left? I guess?

Soda Pop
Anonymous said…
Some not yet reported I should say. Certainly possible they’ve spent in more than reported primary races we don’t know about, but just under a quarter in d5, with another quarter somewhere else, and half not yet reported on the pdc.
Soda Pop
Anonymous said…
Given what happened at Nathan Hale HS, it is understandable that the Jewish community has concern with anti- semitism.

~Peace
Anonymous said…
Soda Pop —

Again, no. They have not spent on any other candidate. They spent a quarter of their money on Song, and half their money is still in the bank. That remaining quarter was spent on all of the many things that you need to spend to start a new organization like website building (likely including logo design and website design), PO Box rental, accounting fees, etc. Expenditures like paying for a PO Box for the organization are not specifically for a candidate but rather for the organization itself. PACs do not spend all of their money on candidates.

These expenditures are already listed, not yet to be reported.

Given the size of their contributions/expenditures, they’re a full reporting PAC. So their 7-day pre-primary reporting was due on Tuesday. This due date ensures that any election mailers that PACs buy appear in the reporting before the primary so they can be discussed before the election, as we are doing here.

PACs are not paying for mailers that it’s too late to send before the primary. That is a foolish idea. So, no, they have not spent on any other candidates, as the record clearly indicates.

Instead of suggesting things that clearly are not true (or would be illegal malfeasance if they were, and as such should be posed in a way that makes it clear that you’re suggesting malfeasance), could you ask them as genuine questions? Like, “Does anyone know if support for other candidates would appear on the PDC site yet?” I think people will be willing to help you understand, and you can help stem the tide of election misinformation and disinformation. Thanks.

—Do Better
Anonymous said…
Absolutely. The question is why, of all the primary races in the entire state, a PAC fighting anti-Semitism chose to only enter one where the main opponent is a Jewish woman (the same scenario as Washingtonians for a Brighter Future and their spending in a Tacoma City Council campaign). The more understandable approach would be for PACs fighting anti-Semitism to help defeat anti-Semites, not help defeat Jewish candidates. I appreciate MW’s looking into this, and finding out who exactly they sent questionnaires to.

—Transparency Please

Seattle is Lost said…
@ Transparency Please

Maybe the PAC was upset by the antisemitism shown at Nathan Hale.

I fully expect the PAC to invest in other candidates.

~ That's all
Behind the Curtain, please resend that link. It did not work and I need to see it.

If a group associated with the PAC did a questionnaire, that doesn’t necessarily mean candidates knew what the PAC was doing. But if I was a candidate I would always strive to find out who was asking questions.

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Nepotism in Seattle Schools