BEX III

Since BEX III is a hot topic of discussion after Mel Westbrook and other's comments last night, I'm re-publishing here comments Charlie Mas posted back in August on the BEX III issue.

The project list put forward by the staff includes:

* Hamilton Middle School - total renovation - $73.4 million

* South Shore - total new construction of a building that could be a K-8 or a 6-8 - $64.7 million

* Denny / Sealth - total new construction of Denny and some shared facilities, total renovation of Sealth classroom building $125 million

* Nathan Hale - total renovation - $77.6 million

* Ingraham - replace one building - $22 million

* Rainier Beach - new auto shop - $500 thousand

These projects were chosen using priorities adopted by the Board in Chapter 3 of the Facilities Master Plan in January. The Board has already committed to the Hamilton project and the Southshore project in votes taken earlier this year.

In addition, BEX III will include:

* Water piping - $10 million

* Indoor Air quality improvements - $10 million

* Synthetic turf replacements - $6 million

* Technology upgrades - $42 million

* BEX IV planning - $2 million

* Program overhead - $48 million

* Financing costs - $17 million

*************
See the following links for more info:

School building levy will be on ballot

http://www.seattleschools.org/area/facilities/SEPA_Addendum.pdf (district document)

Seattle Post-Intelligencer: Sound Off (a post by a frequent commenter on this blog)

A NEW HOME FOR THE NEW SCHOOL AT SOUTH SHORE (page 2 in newsletter)

Comments

Beth Bakeman said…
With a total of 481.2 million, I realize the 48 million overhead is just a standard 10% overhead used in budgeting, but it still looks like an obscence amount of money when listed this way.
9/22/06, 2:22 PM
Anonymous said…
You might look at things like water piping, indoor air quality improvements, synthetic turf replacements, and technology upgrades and think "Hey, aren't those more BTA sort of projects than BEX sort of projects?" and you would be right.

The current BTA is fully appropriated and there won't be another one for a while. These things can't wait, so they went onto BEX III.

Of course, if the District can re-allocate the current BTA to use it on the capital costs of closures and consolidations instead of capital expenditures at the schools they are closing, why can't they re-allocate other BTA money to cover these expenses?

Moreover, how can the District avoid replacing the plumbing at Pinehurst just because it won't be a school anymore? If the District is going to lease the space out, don't they need to replace the plumbing for the tenant?

There may well be absolutely plausible explanations and answers to these questions. I'd just like to hear them.

Perhaps I will send them into the feedback email address.
9/23/06, 8:15 AM
Beth Bakeman said…
Mammatoni, it was nice meeting you in person tonight. I think, from what Charlie said in a later comment, that the plumbing needs to be repaired at Pinehurst and a new roof on Viewlands because the district plans to lease or sell the property, and so still needs to perform scheduled maintenance and repairs to get maximum dollars.
9/27/06, 10:12 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more