Program Placement Proposals due Nov 6

The Program Placement web page has been updated. With only a few days notice it provides an updated Program Placement Proposal form and a deadline of November 6 for program placement proposal submission. The form was created on 11/2/09 - just four days before the deadline. Nice.

Get those proposals written and submitted without delay.

Also, according to slide 26 of the presentation made to the board on November 3:
Program placement process is changing
There was no discussion about how it was changing or even why.

Comments

Luz Villasana said…
What does this mean for the "new" schools? In the academic section, the SPS website lists the following "programs":

Advanced Learning
Athletics
Arts
Career & Technical Education
Huchoosedah Indian Education
Instructional Services
Instructional Technology
International Education
Internet Safety
Library Services
Literacy Resources/Language Arts
Math
Migrant Education
Physical Education
Program Placement
PSAT
Science
Science Materials Center
Social Studies
Special Education
Summer Semester
Traffic Education

Does this mean that if, for example, Sand Point Elementary expects a library, that a request has to be made?

Is there a "minimum", "baseline" or anything the like for a school to open?
11/4/09, 12:50 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Well, that's a good question because Michael did ask about a library at Sand Point and something was mentioned about bookcases.

I'm sure there is a minimum/baseline for opening a school but I'm really not sure who to ask.
11/4/09, 1:38 PM
Charlie Mas said…
Submitted one today to put the Washington service area Spectrum program at Madrona K-8.
11/5/09, 1:20 PM
Charlie Mas said…
This year I submitte a total of five program placement proposals:

1. Denny service area elementary Spectrum at Arbor Heights instead of West Seattle (the same proposal that I submitted last year).

2. Mercer service area elementary Spectrum at Kimball instead of Hawthorne. Kimball is larger, more central to the area, is the home of more Spectrum-eligible students, and has a better general ed population for co-housing with a gifted program (per APP review).

3. Create a new Montessori program at Roxhill. There are Montessori programs in the North, Central, and South but none in the West. There is no Option school in the Denny service area. Roxhill is central to the service area and has space available for a program.

4. Move north-end elementary APP to McDonald. The north-end program should be in the north-end according to District Policy C56.00. The APP locations should be distributed equitably around the district according to District Policy D12.00. McDonald has space and is in the feeder pattern for Hamilton.

5. Establish the Spectrum program for the Washington service area at Madrona K-8. It is more central to the service area than Muir. It would provide additional 6-8 Spectrum capacity in the service area for when Washington's Spectrum capacity is full. It will demonstrate Madrona's commitment to serving advanced students - which has been legitimately questioned.

Did anyone else submit a proposal?
11/6/09, 7:05 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more