Seattle School Board Announces Superintendent Finalists

And so far, I'm pretty impressed.

They are (in no particular order):

- Jeanice Kerr Swift, superintendent of Ann Arbor SD in Michigan
- Andre Spencer, superintendent of Colorado Springs SD, in Colorado
- Denise Juneau, State Superintendent of Public Instruction from 2009 to 2017 in Montana


I'll be doing a separate thread on each and hoping to post all three tonight.

First up, Dr. Swift.

Candidate Denise Juneau https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/supe_candidateA

Candidate Andre Spencer https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/supe_candidateB

Candidate Jeanice Swift https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/supe_candidateC

Please submit any comments by 9:00pm on Thursday, March 29 to allow the Board time to review the feedback. The Board intends to vote at its meeting on April 4 to begin negotiations with a single finalist.

Comments

Liking 2 of the 3 said…
Dr. Spencer has strong connections to the Broad Academy, which raises red flags for me, and his PhD is from an online/for-profit institution, another red flag for me. Dr. Swift and Ms. Juneau have more impressive backgrounds to me. I like Ms. Juneau the best on paper, but I'm strongly drawn to Dr. Swift's strong commitment to the arts (something Seattle is relatively weak in).
3/26/18, 6:58 PM
Anonymous said…
Yes - as stated above, Spencer is a Broadie.
https://www.broadcenter.org/alumni/directory/profile/andre-spencer/

I'd steer clear there.

CT
3/26/18, 8:01 PM
alex said…
Can someone pls explain the Broad Academy. I have a background in education & have never heard of them. He’s seems like a highly qualified African American candidate to me. How bad is this Broad Academy?
3/26/18, 10:04 PM
Liking 2 of the 3 said…
Here is some background from a reputable source: https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/06/08/33broad_ep.h30.html

“People know basically what your reform line is: hard on the unions, pro-charter, pushing for a certain kind of accountability,” said Mr. Klonsky, a chronicler of what he believes are Broad Foundation shortcomings in his blog Small Talk. “It’s not just a coincidence they all have the same position, more or less.”
3/26/18, 10:31 PM
Cheryl said…
For me MS Juneau sounds like the better candidate. She seems to be strong on putting the breaks on Charter schools and she does not seem to be a fan of standardized testing. All pluses for me. I am not that impressed with the other two.
3/26/18, 11:24 PM
Anonymous said…
Broad Foundation primer
https://seattleducation.com/2012/06/23/a-parent-guide-to-the-broad-foundations-training-programs-and-education-policies/

http://progressive.org/public-school-shakedown/funding-education-reform-big-three/

https://capitalandmain.com/eli-broad-and-the-end-of-public-education-as-we-know-it-1007

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/broad-foundationsplan-to-expand-influence-in-school-reform/2012/08/20/c118e134-eb0a-11e1-b811-09036bcb182b_blog.html?utm_term=.c05cd4e3c754

CT
3/27/18, 6:14 AM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Alex, Eli Briad is yet another billionaire trying to shape public education. The Broad Academy is sort of a superintendent charm school that tries to shape the work to one narrative and teaches its students a communication style that’s very Orwellian.

We tried one of their grads in Maria Goodloe-Johnson. She was so driven to HER vision that she ignored teachers AND operations and we ended up in crisis.

No thanks. I’m willing to listen to Spencer but I already have my doubts.
3/27/18, 6:48 AM
alex said…
Very helpful, thanks Melissa & others. Sounds like quite an agenda. I am surprised that the board would have allowed a candidate with an agenda along those lines to get this far especially since SPS went down this road already, unsuccessfully, with Goodloe-Johnson (before my time in Seattle). Odd.
3/27/18, 8:40 AM
Anonymous said…
Let's hope the public Q/A sessions give us a glimpse beyond the predictable platitudes. What is their familiarity with WA and pressing issues in SPS - things like capacity, long range facility planning, budget challenges, changing demographics, 24 credit, etc.?

widget
3/27/18, 2:27 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more