Tuesday Open Thread
We have one person now running for Seattle school board in November - it's Rebeca Muniz and she's running (I believe) in Jill Geary's seat. (Geary is stepping down and I believe this will be the most competitive seat unless the other incumbents also choose to leave.)
About Ms Muniz:
- She appears in a couple of photos with Director Harris - not sure how well they know each other.
- She calls herself "a woman of color"
- From her LinkedIn Page;
I saw an interesting story about social media on Facebook today and I wanted to ask parents what they would do (if anything) if this happened to their child.
Apparently a student in a secondary school was dancing, someone videotaped it and, thinking it was funny, sent it out on the internet. The student in question, who has no social media, found out and is upset. (Unclear if this is something among friends.) The student went to the parent. The parent wants to track it down on social media, get it removed (good luck with that after the horse got out of the barn) and bring in kids' parents to talk about respect and privacy.
It's unclear to me if this was taken in a private setting or a public one (which might make a difference). My advice was to get her son to laugh along and tease back about other kids' funny actions. I say this because too much protest and the kids might push it out there harder and make his life more miserable.
Is this bullying? Should the school get involved? Should the parents be brought in? Wondering what parents on the front line of today's parenting think.
What's on your mind?
About Ms Muniz:
- She appears in a couple of photos with Director Harris - not sure how well they know each other.
- She calls herself "a woman of color"
- From her LinkedIn Page;
She graduated from the University of Washington with a Masters in Education Policy and Leadership. She is the current Program Coordinator in the Division of Public Behavioral Health and Justice Policy at the University of Washington. She has helped advance research with the Seattle Public Schools racial equity teams, and on topics such as the development of youth leadership. She volunteers for One America Votes and the Gender Justice League organization.The City Council passed the MHA yesterday. We should be seeing many changes in housing in neighborhoods throughout the city. I'd like to believe the Council when they say it will create more affordable housing but I have my doubts. But my questions continue to be: why were schools called "amenities" in the HALA and why no impact fees to help schools, etc. that are part of the fabric of neighborhoods? The MHA Implementation Plan has the word "school" in it once.
I saw an interesting story about social media on Facebook today and I wanted to ask parents what they would do (if anything) if this happened to their child.
Apparently a student in a secondary school was dancing, someone videotaped it and, thinking it was funny, sent it out on the internet. The student in question, who has no social media, found out and is upset. (Unclear if this is something among friends.) The student went to the parent. The parent wants to track it down on social media, get it removed (good luck with that after the horse got out of the barn) and bring in kids' parents to talk about respect and privacy.
It's unclear to me if this was taken in a private setting or a public one (which might make a difference). My advice was to get her son to laugh along and tease back about other kids' funny actions. I say this because too much protest and the kids might push it out there harder and make his life more miserable.
Is this bullying? Should the school get involved? Should the parents be brought in? Wondering what parents on the front line of today's parenting think.
What's on your mind?
Comments
Re: Social media issue. Not to dismiss this families concerns but really? A portion of a video dancing at a party. There are so many much bigger, uglier fish to fry. I understand their child is upset but believe me, this is a great opportunity to teach her that the internet is forever and that social media is pervasive even when you do not engage in it. This is the times our kids are growing up in. We might as well have the honest and brutal conversations that hopefully will prevent them from doing stupid things. Nevermind. They are teenagers. They will do stupid things. Let's pray the do not destroy their lives in the process.
Mama Mia
What's that all about?
Huh
Neurodiversity, sorry, the blog is not a business forum, non-profit or not.
So sad
Goodbye Seattle
Just Goofy
I was wondering if you could be more specific and explain in detail why you have come to this conclusion.
"She volunteers for One America Votes and the Gender Justice League organization."
Geez I wounder if it will be 4 years of everything JSW?
I"M TOTALLY DONE, FINISHED with this type of BS!
Most likely she's just full of hot air like most all the past candidates.
Just Goofy
I'd never noticed before, but I think this district may be illegal in its shape. I wonder what the odd shape does to who is electable in that district.
https://www.seattleschools.org/UserFiles/Servers/Server_543/File/District/Departments/Enrollment%20Planning/Maps/DirectorDistricts/DirectorDistrict_portrait_2018%203.pdf
Boston Spike
Why not check out the Crosscut piece in rebuttal? Or Trumps 1989 published letter (identical words) about putting the Central Park 5 (one of whom was 14 years of age) to DEATH (they were later found innocent by DNA) before telling us what is "sad"?
So LEAVE if you won't help Sinclair!
Ask an Ironworker if there is "dying" going on.
Well I think you of all people would find all this justice and gender speak not only obviously hypocritical but also identity politics in disguise. For example weren't you at the Feb 27th board meeting? and didn't you hear Jill Geary admit to the systemic failures in special education. I don't need to tell you this you live it.
So here comes another UW product spewing all things ed reform blah blah blah person of color!!!!
Will there ever be social justice for SPED students, will there be educational justice for SPED students? Will there ever be improvement in outcomes for SPED students?
BTW if Geary couldn't get JUSTICE for SPED then who can?
SPED Parent
Is that an age appropriate book?
I read the book in high school. My high school teaching brother teaches it in 10th grade and thinks some of it is difficult even for that age student.
My daughter read it in seventh grade.
I used it as part of a weekly bookgroup with a 5th grade class, but as the teacher was AWOL, I did not have guidance re book selection.
As an adult, some violent imagery in the book, I completely forgot about until another parent objected.
To Kill a Mocking Bird is read differently by people at different ages, and it's a book worth re-reading through because of that. A 10 year old will get different things out of it than a 20 year old, but that's OK. It doesn't mean a younger student shouldn't read it!
Good Books
https://www.commonsensemedia.org/book-reviews/to-kill-a-mockingbird
"...I vote at least 13 years of age and maybe later when they actually have the developmental capacity to ask deeper questions and generate deeper thoughts about the intersection of sex, race, rape, prejudice, etc. Just because a child has a broad vocabulary and reads well on a technical level, doesn't mean they really understand the full meaning so why encourage it? I remember reading it as a freshman in high school and it was the right time for greater absorption of the full significance of what was going on."
differing opinions
I guess it dosn't really matter because according to main stream liberals the world is ending in 12 years.
Geeze
OMG
all types
The budget JoLynn Berge and Steven Nielsen doctored up for the Board is a POLITICAL document, not a budget.
In 2013, SPS served 50,998 students with a general fund of $621M.
Our district has NOT gotten inundated with Special Education students or dramatically poorer students, YET next year we are going to be serving about that same number, only now with a budget of OVER $900M? And, that is too little money? What?!?
So, despite the extra $300M, to make ends meet, Berge and Nielsen want to CUT TEACHERS? AND change the secondary WSS from 29:1 to 30:1?
WHY NOT CUT HEAD OFFICE? If they can't find $40M to cut from JSCEE, why not get a parent committee to present an alternative budget to the board that whittles down JSCEE staff but preserves both teachers and the original 29:1 ratio? In tough times, priorities...
Berge and Nielsen are intent on singling out and punishing certain schools. They also have gifted a few *special* ones with extra 'love' aka money.
They have mutated the weighted staffing standards (WSS) formula that distributes money fairly/consistently amongst all to the most incompressible convoluted non-algorithm, literally incomprehensible, so that you can't follow it and use it to predict what school "x" would get based on their enrollment and student composition. That should tell you the tool is now a political tool, not a budget tool. So much for equity.
To short-sheet a school, then, have kids show up, but, have no teacher for the kids, then have them waste time parked in front of a sub until the principal can actually hire a teacher destroys student learning, unnecessarily and predictably so. Why are Berge and Nielsen doing this? In hopes those kids go away, to get the credits/teaching they need through other, non-SPS means? Running Start comes to mind, but so too does Red Comet or any other easy to tee up ready made, pre-approved OSPI solution.
They have post-open enrollment numbers RIGHT NOW. If this is not a POLITICAL document, then, why can't they just post the raw data? Probably because armed with real data, communities could push back they bogus teacher RIFs NOW.
Remember this district closed schools in West Seattle, despite parents with their baby buggies pleading with them not to. SPS did it anyway, and then SPS had to reopen every single school pronto, but not before letting Schmitz Park lapse into a shanty town with 17 portables. Shameful. Yet, who lost their jobs for that level of incompetence; it cost the district millions? No one. Well, BERGE and NIELSEN are doing it again. Hammering certain schools, failing to support others and doing so unchallenged, because they have made access to data impossible, so, pushing back is impossible.
If they have nothing to hide, why haven't they released the data? Is post-open enrollment showing something they don't want us to see? Like maybe, Lincoln is failing to launch? Back when West Seattle had their post-school-closure crisis, and a new school had to be opened as an option to cope with the enrollment demand outstripping seats, that new school garnered 188 kids without even trying, parents were so ready to abandon non-preforming local schools and were keen to go for that K5 that was outside of their boundaries because it was that alluring. Can the same be said for Lincoln? How many non-attendance kids selected it? Any? Did LHS post-open enrollment number hit the budgeted 566? And, if not, if those students are staying at Ballard and Roosevelt, have their proposed RIFs been adjusted to reflect reality, or, are those communities being forced to twist in the wind to serve Berge's and Nielsen's POLITICAL agenda?
FAKE BUDGET
Fourth graders should be exposed to some concepts, but not all that To Kill a Mockingbird has to offer.
-Cynic
“I’m not implying we should ban To Kill a Mockingbird. But make no mistake: its privileged position in the canon is muscling out some other great books—and that’s what should make us uncomfortable.”
http://www2.ncte.org/blog/2017/11/lets-stop-pretending-kill-mockingbird-progressive-race/
I would agree with link Jet City mom on the issue that there are many, many fine books about racism that should become part of the public education rotation. It is a difficult choice and one that should be part of a balance of reasoning and not just one factor like "it's a popular book" or "this new book was written by a black author." We need more texts from people of color and, luckily, there many great ones.
Increasing the levy lid will decrease state responsibilities and increase local responsibilities. The numbers are staggering. Stay tuned.
One, why should schools have to pay the difference? That's the district's responsibility.
Two, how do you know they will replace them?
There was an accounting decision made by downtown. Principals were told that they need to charge about $13,000 to the discretionary fund for each part time position to cover the health care.
This is a great example of the tail wagging the dog. Nearly every school in the district is undergoing the displacement process and first up are the part time employees because part timers are suddenly vastly more expensive to the school building.
An accounting decision has fundamentally redirected the process of the RIF's. You would think the union would be all over this but ... this issue has gotten very little day light.
I suppose you recommend anything by Adichie? Barf Puke barf diarrhea
Not BLACK
The Bill Analysis of SB 5689 states:
"Provides that a teacher's evaluation may not be negatively impacted if a teacher
chooses to use curriculum or materials that address sexual orientation including
gender expression or identity if the materials are age appropriate and connected to the
content area"
This would be a dangerous policy open to an individual teacher's subjective interpretation that may be very offensive to parents and the community, with no oversight by the school or district administration allowed. In the worst case scenario, it could be used to groom children sexually.
North Mom
If you have a penis you are a boy if not you are a girl.
Case closed
A win isn't always a win i.e. unsustainable double digit pay increases, lifting the levy cap, mandating complete healthcare for every worker and advocating for an unconstitutional Income Tax aka Capital Gains Tax.
Adichie and Achebe are different people writing in different millennia. Things Fall Apart is by the latter.
You have a very narrow idea of how we come into the world, you obviously have limited experience with a selection of baby people, because sometimes they have a penis, sometimes they don’t, sometimes they do not have any discernible genitalia and sometimes they have extra.
Physical appearance also does not necessarily have much to do with what combination of chromosomes they have.
North Mom, if that's the entire bill in context, I would say no as well. Parents have a right to know what is being taught in the classroom and - by district policy - to examine it before it is taught. I can't imagine a district saying to its teachers, "Whatever you want to say."