King County NAACP Charges WIAA Discriminates Against Black Teams

In a lengthy email to the Washington Interscholastic Athletic/Activities Association (WIAA), the King County NAACP charges that "students and communities of color" have been "affected by the discriminatory practices and policies governed by the Washington Interscholastic Athletic/Activities Association (WIAA), to their respective athletic programs in the state of Washington."

The KC NAACP alleges this example:

There have been patterns of inequitable sanctions placed on Rainier Beach High School (RBHS) a predominantly school of color, dated since 2014, in which the WIAA denied the RBHS boys basketball team to accept an invite to a national tournament in New York and discovered through WIAA meeting minutes (December 2013) that they approved a predominantly white coach and school to attend a national tournament a year prior. To add insult to injury, the RBHS team fought and won their request to attend the national tournament, but WIAA forbade them to practice until the day they left to the national tournament. This is discriminatory as different rules were applied to the two schools.

They go on to say that this school year there again has been a practice of "foul play of reporting a loss for RBHS' basketball team" and that while the WIAA "revised RBHS’s win/loss record of 18-3 on the main website, they left the 17-4 win/loss record on the RPI system."

Basically - and using mathematical evidence - the KC NAACP has laid out a story of the WIAA seeming to discriminate against mostly Black teams while shoring up mostly white (and private school) teams. 

They want "a revision of the 21-22 state basketball seeding to reflect the true RPI results for RBHS, Mountlake Terrace and the other teams that were affected.

It is WIAA’s responsibility to ensure that this process is fair and accurate per your mission. We are not accepting an apology and that you will make changes next year. We are demanding change effective immediately. (bold and underscore theirs).

In addition, we are demanding more diversity, inclusion, and transparency of the WIAA Executive Board and staff. Your staff does not reflect the diversity of student athletes in Washington State public schools.

I looked at the WIAA website. Yes, their staff and Board are both quite white. It is odd, given how many teams have so many athletes of color.

It will be interesting to see what happens from here. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
In 2014, the SPS Board, headed by Betty Patu, voted unanimously to approve the RBHS bball team to be a part of this national tournament as it was a great experience. I am disappointed that the Executives at WIAA have continued discriminatory practices towards our schools! There may need to be a change of governance to be directed by the people not by Athletic Directors from each District. It is a conflict of interest, especially those (O’Dea) who serve on stakeholder committees that cause discriminatory damages to kids and families of
color. How do you jump from #8 to #3 without evidence to support this BS?!?!
2/27/22, 2:54 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Who Is A. J. Crabill (and why should you care)?

Why You Should Care Mr. Crabill has found quite the acolyte in Director Chandra Hampson. In the course of discussions over SOFG, she says his name over and over, "A.J .says we...." Now that's not too surprising given the direction the district is heading and that it is Mr. Crabill's work with the Council of Great City Schools is how we got here. But it appears that Mr. Crabill is working very closely with Hampson and we know she wields some amount of power over the majority of the Board. Mr. Crabill is going to continue to work with the Board as SOFG is instituted in SPS. In fact, his role may become more public as it did at one SPS Board meeting in the spring where he was on the phone during the meeting and suggested the Board stop the meeting to "self-reflect." I also noticed that in a district in South Carolina, when things weren't going to plan, he blamed the Board for not following SOFG to the letter. Look for that to happen here if Board members w
Read more

Why the Majority of the Board Needs to be Filled with New Faces

This may only be a partial list of reasons; please, add anything else in the comments. The deadline to file to run for the Board is May 19th. Entire Board Majority NOT vetting the Superintendent in any way, shape or form. Even the Seattle Times thought that was wrong.  It was just absolute hubris and it was wrong. For the second time in just over a year , board members voted to negotiate a superintendent contract during a special meeting with no opportunity for public comment. This time, they showed an even deeper disregard for their responsibilities as public servants: Aborting a national search for a new superintendent and denying Interim Superintendent Brent Jones a chance to show students, parents and taxpayers that, indeed, he is the best person for the job. Government bodies can’t fast-forward through transparent processes just because they think they know the right answer. One other odd thing about the hiring of Brent Jones - most permanent SPS superintendent contracts ar
Read more