King County NAACP Charges WIAA Discriminates Against Black Teams

In a lengthy email to the Washington Interscholastic Athletic/Activities Association (WIAA), the King County NAACP charges that "students and communities of color" have been "affected by the discriminatory practices and policies governed by the Washington Interscholastic Athletic/Activities Association (WIAA), to their respective athletic programs in the state of Washington."

The KC NAACP alleges this example:

There have been patterns of inequitable sanctions placed on Rainier Beach High School (RBHS) a predominantly school of color, dated since 2014, in which the WIAA denied the RBHS boys basketball team to accept an invite to a national tournament in New York and discovered through WIAA meeting minutes (December 2013) that they approved a predominantly white coach and school to attend a national tournament a year prior. To add insult to injury, the RBHS team fought and won their request to attend the national tournament, but WIAA forbade them to practice until the day they left to the national tournament. This is discriminatory as different rules were applied to the two schools.

They go on to say that this school year there again has been a practice of "foul play of reporting a loss for RBHS' basketball team" and that while the WIAA "revised RBHS’s win/loss record of 18-3 on the main website, they left the 17-4 win/loss record on the RPI system."

Basically - and using mathematical evidence - the KC NAACP has laid out a story of the WIAA seeming to discriminate against mostly Black teams while shoring up mostly white (and private school) teams. 

They want "a revision of the 21-22 state basketball seeding to reflect the true RPI results for RBHS, Mountlake Terrace and the other teams that were affected.

It is WIAA’s responsibility to ensure that this process is fair and accurate per your mission. We are not accepting an apology and that you will make changes next year. We are demanding change effective immediately. (bold and underscore theirs).

In addition, we are demanding more diversity, inclusion, and transparency of the WIAA Executive Board and staff. Your staff does not reflect the diversity of student athletes in Washington State public schools.

I looked at the WIAA website. Yes, their staff and Board are both quite white. It is odd, given how many teams have so many athletes of color.

It will be interesting to see what happens from here. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
In 2014, the SPS Board, headed by Betty Patu, voted unanimously to approve the RBHS bball team to be a part of this national tournament as it was a great experience. I am disappointed that the Executives at WIAA have continued discriminatory practices towards our schools! There may need to be a change of governance to be directed by the people not by Athletic Directors from each District. It is a conflict of interest, especially those (O’Dea) who serve on stakeholder committees that cause discriminatory damages to kids and families of
color. How do you jump from #8 to #3 without evidence to support this BS?!?!
2/27/22, 2:54 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more