Should Seattle Schools Continue Masking?

I'm interested in parents thoughts on this issue.

Crosscut reports that WA state has lifted its mandate. 

Starting March 12, Washington state will no longer require people to wear masks in K-12 schools, grocery stores, retail shops, bars, restaurants and most other indoor spaces.

The state will also stop requiring masks to be worn on school buses on that date, a change that matches the updated federal guidance, Inslee’s office said.

 I read that Kent SD is lifting their mandate on March 14th and:

Students and staff will have the choice to wear a mask at school, with the expectation that others’ choices will be respected. One should not make assumptions regarding someone’s beliefs or health status, nor should they comment on them. Our district will not tolerate bullying of any kind for those who choose to continue wearing masks.”

KUOW:

According to the statement, Seattle Schools will continue until further notice with their current policy, which requires all students, staff, visitors and others to mask while at Seattle school buildings. Mask use will continue to be required on buses as well.

“Future decisions on mask use within the district will be made in partnership with public health, and new policy implementation will be established after consultation and mutually agreed upon guidelines that are reached through bargaining with our labor partners,” the statement said.

The district must bargain with the Seattle Education Association before changing mask requirements.
 
 
Jennifer Matter is the president of the teachers union. She said Monday that the union wants to see mask rules lift no sooner than two weeks after spring break, or May 1, which is two months from now. 
 
Matter said they want to see whether there's a spike in cases after the most recent break, and again see what happens with cases in schools after spring break.

Here's what SPS says. 


Here's what the CDC says:

Effective February 25, 2022, CDC is exercising its enforcement discretion to not require that people wear masks on buses or vans operated by public or private school systems, including early care and education/child care programs. CDC is making this change to align with updated guidance that no longer recommends universal indoor mask wearing in K-12 and early education settings in areas with a low or medium COVID-19 Community Level. 
 
CDC plans to amend its Mask Order as soon as practicable to not require that people wear masks while outdoors on conveyances or while outdoors on the premises of transportation hubs, and to not require that people wear masks on buses or vans operated by public or private school systems. 
 
All passengers on other public conveyances (e.g., airplanes, ships*, ferries, trains, subways, buses, taxis, ride-shares) traveling into, within, or out of the United States (including U.S. territories) as well as conveyance operators (e.g., crew, drivers, conductors, and other workers involved in the operation of conveyances), regardless of their vaccination status, are required to wear a mask over their nose and mouth.

Here's a letter from several teachers union chapters: 

May be an image of text 

No photo description available.

Comments

Kate (Belltown) said…
Yes, masking needs to continue in schools and all school-related settings until at least May 1, for the reasons stated in the letter to Director Worsham and Dr. Duchin. We still don’t even know if there will be an increase in cases due to the mid-winter break. Seattle Public Schools still has many schools with very inadequate ventilation. My husband is a teacher, and has 140 students. Unlike many other workplaces, teachers and students are in close contact the entire day — that is, this is not intermittent or short-term contact. Masking is the only way to keep everyone safe. There are still many children who are not fully vaccinated (or boosted, for those eligible) or cannot yet be vaccinated. And as mentioned, there are many educators, family and community members who are immune compromised. Now is not the time to risk all the sacrifices that have been made.
Anonymous said…
At this point in time, with the variants we know, vaccines and anti-virals available to us, known outcomes for young children, and the fact that a good lot of us already got omicron in January, masking seems unnecessary. That can always change with new variants or information. At the same time, it’s not worth kicking off a teacher strike over. The union and the district need to own being the holdouts here and explain why SPS is once again the only district being overly cautious - and there are trade offs to keeping masks on all day. The health protocols and vigilance are burning out teachers and my students hate them.

On You
Anonymous said…
If the CDC says masks are no longer necessary I feel obligated to trust their knowledge of the science. I cannot believe that the teacher's union is more experienced in evaluating the risk of covid than the CDC.

Eckstein parent
Joe said…
The letter may represent the educators, but it sure doesn't represent students or their families. Nobody's asking for a mask ban, anyone should be free to wear a mask if they want to.

It would be telling if the only settings where mandatory masking remains later this month is in SPS and in hospitals, think of what kind of message that sends about how hostile SPS is to the community!
Anonymous said…
May 1 seems an arbitrary date given the current guidance nationally about the omicron surge. The surge peak has convincingly receded, case levels in KC are back go what they were before the surge (October levels, and lower than shortly before school began in the fall). SPS specific stats (though not entirely complete, potentially) show very low levels of cases. Hospitalization rates have decreased, and those with omicron infections (especially if vaccinated and boosted are less likely to be seriously ill).

In fact, the period *before* spring break (March 11-April 11) may be the time to take a respite from masks, to test the waters and to be store up energy for a potential return to masking if we see future surges. We will need to learn to manage covid surges along with other infection diseases in schools and other public places; slow, bureaucratic responses (in either direction) will hinder response. Waiting until May 1 to make a change (when the landscape might be entirely different) is such an example of helpless slowness.

(That being said, my HS senior says that indeed they do know how to wear masks and that he believes many are willing, if it would help, and resigned even if it wouldn't)

zb
Anonymous said…
Waiting to take off the masks makes sense to me. They are a miniscule issue. However, if you want to look at some interesting stats look at the teaching staff. Over 25% are over 55 and many of the staff have complicating health issues. They also have large amounts of sick time that they can burn. So if the masks come off too soon your kid is going to get a sub for the rest of the year if they're lucky because a large proportion of the sub pool falls into those categories as well. So don't rush things and be thoughtful and compassionate or get a substandard remainder of the school year.

Cheers,

Theo Moriarty
Outsider said…
Funny thing is, I asked my middle schooler, who predicted most of those students will continue to wear masks even after it's not required. Not sure if it's really healthy, but students that age have become attached to the anonymity provided by masks. It lets them hide their emotions, their snacking, and their actual faces. It's easier for adolescents to just be eyes.
Seattle Parent/Educator said…
I say follow the scientific consensus, period. If most expert sources think we can get rid of the masks, then I am in favor of that.

Any other course is just a less damaging version of what the anti-maskers/vaxxers do.

Seattle Parent/Educator said…
Also a comment to On You. Based on what I've seen in my school (and in a few others I subbed at earlier this year), many teachers will happily ditch the masks. The mask-wearing has been pretty hit or miss anyway (and at least in high schools, pretty haphazard amongst students, especially among those who might be viewed as "privileged").
Anonymous said…
I can understand the concern coming from the pro and anti mask contingents. As a parent of 2 kids in SPS my first priority is keeping schools open and the second priority is increasing academic rigor. I'd be willing to wait until May or even the end of the school year if that ensures schools remains open and is preferred by teachers and staff. The pandemic has been very hard on people in material and psychological terms so another month or two of masks doesn't move the needle for me.

My concerns around SPS are the teaching priorities and the objective results of state assessments. I'd rather spend energy advocating for more academic rigor and less time spent on racial affinity groups and hosting homeless camps on school property, land acknowledgements, etc.

Anonee Mouse
Anonymous said…
Though I think it makes sense to start unmasking, I do agree that schools are special places, with their required attendance and certainly am not going to be protesting anywhere if the decision to stay masked is made.

I do not like the MOU/bargaining form of continuing guidance on this issue, though. I think decisions to unmask (and mask) should be made more rapidly, and as the latest interviews in the Seattle Times say, there's no way to make clear decision trees on the questions going forward (say, for example, specific metrics, etc.) All decisions are imperfect.

zb
Anonymous said…
And when students show up without masks, then what? Those students will come to school. They won’t be able to just send them home. Teachers who can’t deal with it need to move along.

Realistic
Anonymous said…
My issue is how decisions in SPS are determined. Decisions since the beginning of the pandemic largely driven behind the scenes by certain vocal members such as the teacher's union president. "We feel it is too soon" and maybe just maybe May 1st...or not etc". In other words.... maybe May 1st, maybe end of year, maybe next year etc. In other words, opinions by non-experts subject to misinformation or extremism over BOTH health and educational experts....WA state Superintendent Chris Rekdal, plus at the federal level CDC,...Biden's Secretary of Education Miguel Cordon. I trust that all these experts together are/have been all along making prudent recommendations for places such as King County & Seattle. The educational experts felt children should have returned to in person much sooner than late last Spring. It took an emergency mandate in regards to mental health by Governor Inslee for SPS to return our children hybrid. Decision making in SPS seems very arbitrary if not in close alignment with local & state public health recommendations, such as neighboring districts are doing. Neighboring districts along with private schools are closely & transparently following evolving guidelines. Masking of children is not without harm. In SPS children have been unable to have choir indoors at all until now... even masked, go on field trips, or be outside without masks. At some schools kids are closely policed at lunchtime while eating or drinking. High school performances are now allowed, but majority of performers on stage MUST be masked. I firmly believe in masking when public health experts believe it necessary in the "emergency" phase. However, as we move towards the endemic phase and masking is off in our community, why are we continuing to ask our children to do MORE than what we are asking of our adults in Seattle? If the entire community has moved towards endemic, is continuing to ask our children to do MORE than our adults actually even effective? Is it moral, ethical, equitable or at some point unreasonable and draconian? What about all of our surrounding districts, plus private schools in Seattle who are following public health and not negotiating with their unions over every change? Is not this inequitable for Seattle Public students?

Food for Thought
Anonymous said…
One more thing in response to the SEA president speaking apparently for the entire community that "it is too soon for us" and then referencing prioritizing "pregnant and immunocompromised"...do you really think that you know more or care more or understand the multifaceted science, data & reasons for evolving recommendations more than our federal, state and local public health & educational experts making those recommendations? Lack of trust in experts and/or misinformation IMO. Don't you believe the very same people you are concerned about are part of and will be engaging (grocery shopping etc) within our local community? Does mask wearing in classrooms continue to provide any real and significant benefit in that case? Those who feel the need will continue wearing high quality masks which provides some protection, alongside other measures. I believe many students will also continue to voluntarily wear masks to support the same, in their classrooms if asked. But it's my view that SPS should be aligning themselves and making decisions same as neighboring districts & private schools. There are multiple lenses in which to view the situation, and people affected by policy and decision making.

Food for thought
Anonymous said…
From article "Most schools districts around the country have transitioned to a mask optional model". Moving towards endemic policy (away from emergency) aligning with local, state, federal guidelines. This includes the one of the last districts (alongside SPS) in the country to enable students to return back to in-person even hybrid, Chicago Public Schools (CPS). CPS spokeswoman noting" enormous change in circumstances since the union (CTU) agreement was reached at the height of the Omicron surge...Since that time every local, state, and federal public health agency has recommended that masking (in schools) becomes optional". https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/ct-chicago-public-schools-mask-mandate-20220307-dp2krgaoljf4tosp4pp5rn6wyu-story.html

JK
Patrick said…
My child has graduated from SPS so I might not the person you were asking, Melissa, but I'll answer anyway.

I think masking should be maintained unitl the pandemic is over. The way the CDC has flipflopped is enormously destructive both to the population and to CDCs reputation. Masks are effective, shows the CDC's own study: When masks are mandatory there's 23% less Covid transmission than when they are optional:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/03/08/school-mask-cdc-covid-transmission/

The more cases of Covid are floating around, the more nasty variants we will get. Wearing masks is a slight inconvenience compared to getting a breakthrough case, possibly retransmitting it. When masks are mandatory, most students will cooperate, but when they are optional most students will ignore the suggestion.

This isn't science, it's wishful thinking.
Anonymous said…
@Patrick,

Here’s some science for you: NYT review unable to confirm that blue state precautions were more than marginally effective, when compared to red states (WA state is featured). The usual caveats - this is a snapshot in time, what is true today wasn’t necessarily true at the beginning of COVID, may not be true in the future. But to insist 50k children continue wearing masks to the detriment of their education without having iron clad evidence it is necessary is ridiculous. We know COVID is now as infectious as measles, that cloth masks (allowable at SPS) are much less effective, and that families congregate outside of schools as mandates lift everywhere. I have multiple friends whose children caught COVID at school in January. More deadly variants may come through and it may make sense to put them back on. It is nonsensical to insist students bear the burden of this pandemic when the world has moved on, and we have much more sophisticated tools available. The best measure we can take is to get adults vaxxed - they’ll still get COVID but they won’t end up in the hospital.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/09/briefing/covid-precautions-red-blue-states.html

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Education News Roundup