Garfield Parents and Safety at Garfield High School

This story from KUOW:

Garfield High School parents want Seattle leaders to do more to protect students after a 17-year-old was shot in the leg nearby the school last week.

Parents and community members want city leaders and Seattle Public Schools to take stronger action to protect students and the larger Central District community. They told KUOW they feel like they have to do something to make it clear that something must be done about escalating violence they are witnessing.

“It should not be a privilege to have safety. [It] should be offered to all students," said another Garfield parent, whose name we're not disclosing to protect their child's privacy.

According to a Seattle Police Department statement, the shooting on March 13 was not connected to a homicide that happened later in the day near 24th Avenue South and South Main Street. Investigators are still looking for a suspect. The student who was shot in the leg was not the intended target, according to police.

Who was there?

Newly elected Seattle City Councilmember Tanya Woo attended the East Precinct Advisory Council meeting Monday night, where many Garfield High parents showed up to voice their concerns and talk about solutions.

Woo shared some of the solutions parents brought up during the meeting ahead of the “protect and protest” event Wednesday, including the use of firearm trigger locks, looking at Seattle’s Youth Violence Prevention Initiative, and how best to use cameras and police officers outside school. Woo said parents also suggested looking at bus schedules to make sure kids are getting on their buses and leaving the area after school.

I appreciate that CM Woo showed up but those are tired solutions that have no immediacy (except for the buses - the district could assign personnel to the buses, making sure students get on quickly).  

The district website reflected that there might be Board members there but I suspect not if KUOW didn't report that.

What next?

Some parents have organized a “protect and protest'' event Wednesday, exactly one week after the student was shot. Organizers invited the community to protest at each corner of 23rd Avenue at 2:10 p.m., before school ends, to help them bring awareness to the ongoing gun violence in the area.

In a statement, the Seattle Police Department said they’ll continue with an enhanced presence around Garfield High to ensure safety for everyone.

Comments

Unknown said…
The irony here is rich. What does Seattle's preeminent social justice academy propose we do? More cops? And who will police gun sales to ensure they're done legally? Or if we outlaw guns, who enforces that?

They helped make this bed. They can sleep in it.

SP
3/20/24, 4:15 PM
Anonymous said…
Director Sarju attended, and didn't speak until someone asked whether SPS might return to having police officers in schools (as a regular presence — aka "school resource officers"). Sarju said the Board has no say in such decisions. (Apparently she wasn't aware that the Board Policy since 2020 has prohibited this type of police presence in Seattle public schools. https://www.seattleschools.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/4311.pdf)
— Meeting Attendee
3/21/24, 11:05 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more