Seattle School Board Meeting Agenda - March 6, 2024

I perceive this could be a short meeting by the agenda listings. 

First, there is a "State Auditor's Office Entrance Conference." I looked at the attached materials and I don't see any real info beyond what areas the Auditor's Office looked at for SPS. 

Next, there are 20 people on the speakers list with a 10-person waitlist. Most of the stated topics are broad but seem to be about student mental health care as well as counselors. 

The Consent agenda is short and contains the revisions to the Board policy on "Board Member Residency." It still does not tell directors to - once a year - state that they continue to live in the district from which they were elected. I do not think that is a lot to ask. 

Then they will have a Work Session on the empty board seats. This may be the most interesting part of the meeting depending on what is mentioned. 

According to the schedule at the website, video statements from the candidates were recorded last week and should be available some time this week. I'll put those up when they are at the website. 

As well, the schedule reflects that on March 13th, the Board will have a "special meeting" to announce select/announce finalists for each seat. I would say for certain that for D2, there will be a narrowing down from 11 candidates to maybe 3-4. D4 has just 4 candidates so it's not clear if the Board would narrow that group down further.

After the Work Session,  there is the ever-tedious "Board Time-Use Evaluation." 

What is concerning after that section it appears that the Board will no longer be having a "Board Director Questions and Staff Responses" section in the Board meeting agenda. If true, it's a real loss because there is then no way to know what directors are thinking about staff work. 

I will not be able to blog live tomorrow night but will follow up on Thursday.

Comments

Juana said…
Any insight into multiple people raising urgent concerns about Rainier View/Anitra Jones or are you still a big supporter of Jones? I saw today there’s a public employee review on March 24, curious!
3/8/24, 11:46 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more