Mental health records belonging to middle schoolers in Seattle Public Schools exposed

Update: here's a link to my post on the Seattle Times story. Here's a link to the 2022 Times' story.

end of update

 

Members of the community have been investigating the release and exposure of sensitive student psychological and mental health records to third parties by Seattle Public Schools. If your child took a middle school mental health assessment called Check Yourself between 2018-2024, their records may have been included in the batches released.

These are not anonymized records. This was not an anonymous survey — it was an identifiable Assessment Test that scores the child and “triages” them according to internal documentation. Internal documentation also refers to these student records as “PHI” (Protected Health Information) containing “PII” (Personally Identifiable Information). Normally PHI/PII health records are protected by HIPAA, yet these are not ؅— which is how we could gain copies of them as a test to prove they are unprotected.

 

Included above is a picture of a small section of the students’ health records which have been purposely obscured and minimized so that no student personally identifiable information is viewable to the public. 

Included within the records we can see are:

- Student answers to every question on the psychological assessment

- Many of the answers are write-in fields and we can see Seattle students wrote in many details about what is going on for them inside their home and with their family members (example: “my parents arguing with my brother…”; “there is arguing between my sister and parents or my parents…”; “i skip meals only because of my medication i take to help my adhd…"

Many typed in what they felt about taking the assessment test: 

“why did we have to do it?”
“i hated it”
“i never want to do this ever again”
‘why do you ask so many weird questions”
“deez nuts”

 We can see within the records responses to questions by the students ages 11, 12 and 13 on very personal information, such as:

- Who do you want to date more than a friend? (write it in)
- Who do you have a crush on? (write it in)
- Have your family members spent time in jail?
- Are you questioning your gender?
- Write in what you experience at home (write it in)
- Drugs you are taking (write it in)

- Suicide ideation; Depression; Eating disorders; Partner violence; Family members arguing at home; Animal cruelty activities; and more

All of this and more is included in the copies of the above student records. 

Seattle Public Schools wrote on a form to us that these records contain “Personal information contained in a file maintained for student in a public school” and that they contain  “identifying information that is directly related to a student and maintained by a school.”

SPS signed a data-sharing agreement to third parties to release these student health records to the requestors in exchange for grants in the range of $3 million. 

Parents were not informed that their children’s assessment records, their intervention notes and records from the assessment would be tied to their personally identifiable information and released outside of the school for any purpose. 

If you think your child may have been tested using the Check Yourself assessment, and you would like to talk to someone about these records that have been released please email me at

sss.westbrook@gmail.com for more information.

Comments

Unknown said…
Where's the major media coverage of this?

SP
Well, the Times has covered it, even with their own in-depth story, but nothing came of it. Parents need to rise up in numbers but SPS is very cagey in their explanation to parents.

I do have one last thing I can do and I think it might work. I'll let you know.
Anonymous said…
The lack of protections on these student health records was discovered after the Times article was published. The community members and parents who discovered the lack of HIPAA protections and public accessibility to these health records (as well as their releasement to third parties who obtained access to them in exchange for financial compensation) did so after the Times article eluded to it. This is a recent development.
Anonymous said…
This makes me sick to my stomach. Whoever authorized the survey being conducted needs to answer questions. Whoever authorized the sale of HPI data needs to be fired at the least.

BLUE SKY
Anonymous said…
The invasiveness of this questionnaire was truly repulsive, and it was going to be handled by a bunch of amateurs and be sold on the open market like a free-for-all. I know that seems like hyperbole, but truly, there were no real controls on any of this and the questions were truly inappropriate. Frankly, if they want to spot kids at risk vulnerable kids, they shouldn’t need a questionnaire. some may fly under the radar, but I think most are obvious. And if you need this kind of computer screen to be able to catch the ones that are at risk, then it tells me the adults in the building simply aren’t paying attention.

I’ve always supported my kids to understand privacy and that everything on the Internet is public and permanent. I never wanted them to do this but left the choice to them and they refused to take these questionnaires each time. I can tell you the biology teacher at JAMS gave my kid an incredibly hard time and demanded that she participate AND EVEN GAVE EXTRA BONUS POINTS TO COUNT TO BIOLOGY IF YOU TOOK IT!!! My kid had to learn to self advocate in an exceptionally intimidating scenario, where everybody looked at her like she was a freak for not participating, that biology teacher was horrible to her and yet my daughter knew she was her test and homework, and she had to walk the line of being deferential and sucking up while nevertheless maintaining a boundary. truly awful teacher.

It doesn’t surprise me one iota this leaked, as far as I’m concerned, it was built for sharing amongst the muckety-mucks and corporate vultures who have made education a product-opportunity rife with snake oil salesman lining up to pick the pockets of taxpayers. Of course, this wasn’t truly anonymized: data is much more valuable when you can identify who it comes from because then you have power and a sellable product, which is in fact, the data. Seattle is ideal for that kind of scenario of being sold junk from profit seekers who truly don’t give a flying F about Learning or our civil Society commons: Just look at the Garbage science curriculum, amplify.



JAMS sucked
Amanda F. said…
Sounds like lawsuit time to me. Anyone who deals with privacy laws at a basic level (health or education) knows not to release protected info, much less to sell it. Unreal.
Patrick said…
What on earth were they thinking? The test cost money, right, money that the District is always short of? And the District doesn't even have enough school psychologists to treat the people who self-identify or have their families identify them as needing help.

Board members - This is the District spending precious time, money,and energy on a pet project that even at best does absolutely NOTHING to improve student outcomes.

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Education News Roundup