Hard to Know What to Think About Trans Students

Update: I had meant to add this story out of Olympia, We Thought She Was a Great Teacher. This teacher was obviously very misguided but it's frightening that no other adults saw the behavior until it was too late. 

update

I have attempted to wade into this topic previously but new stories have cropped up so I think it bears revisiting. 

I want to be clear - I believe trans people. I also believe that kids can know this about themselves.

However, the issue of trans children in schools makes it part of more than just one family's life.  It can affect schools in many ways. In the classroom. In sports. In the locker room. In bathrooms.

Parents, I'm not in SPS but what does the district send home at the beginning of the year that covers this topic? Anything?

I recall decades back when police finally developed rape kits and it became okay to publicly talk about rape, the number of rape arrests went up. Were there more rapes or was there more reporting? I think the latter. This may be true for trans students. There is just more awareness.

In my reading, I have seen the word "contagion" in reference to trans students. Because gender issues are being more openly spoken of, especially in schools, more kids might be questioning their own gender. When I say "schools," I don't mean teachers and staff necessarily, I mean also out on the playground and in the hallways. 

I will also point out that puberty is a troubling time for all but, with social media, I think it is an especially trying time to be a teen.  FYI, May is Mental Health Awareness Month.

I bring this up again because Seattle Schools in the news again on this issue as it relates to the student health centers in SOME schools. I highlight "some" because the student health centers are not operated by just one health organization. 

Here's what Seattle Schools says about LGBTQIA Resources.  

Here's a list of School-based Health Centers. There are 14 in high schools, 7 in middle schools and 7 elementary schools.  It is noted that Hamilton Middle School only has mental health services. I believe Eckstein MS is the only large middle school with no services. The providers are Kaiser Permanente, Neighborcare Health, Swedish Medical Center, Odessa Brown Children's Clinic, and Public Health - Seattle & King County. 

Here's the Know Your Rights: Trans and Nonbinary Students page at the SPS website. I'll circle back to this page.

The group that was in the news is Neighborhood Health which operates 14 of the health centers in Seattle Public schools.  This is from the Daily Wire (thanks to a reader!):

“The Neighborcare Health team wanted to share an exciting new update to our School-based Health Center services,” the email from a Program Manager for Neighborcare Health, which was obtained by Parents Defending Education through a public records request, reads. “Our program will begin offering comprehensive, evidence-based, gender-affirming care services to our students and families who need them.”

The change meant that the group could now give hormone treatments to children, it explained. “While our School-based Health Centers have long offered a continuum of gender-affirming care services including supportive student counseling, promotion of social identity, and health education, this step will allow us to begin offering families access to important medical interventions including hormone treatments,” it states.

The company official stated in the email that its foray into hormone treatment for children would initially be to a pilot program and that the administration of the irreversible drugs would only occur with parental approval.

“These services will be a small pilot available to students and families within the existing schools we serve,” the email went on to state, also noting that hormone therapy will only be administered to those who have the approval of parents or legal guardians.

See that last line? Absolutely true - students cannot access health services in the centers without a parent's approval. (I would think emergency services are something else.) The issue there, though, is that once the parent puts their John Hancock on the permission sheet, ANY service is then authorized and, except for elementary students, most students can ask for services without either the student or the health center telling the parent.

And to note - SPS does NOT dictate what services are offered through these providers, they just provide space. Sure, but I'd be willing to bet that SPS decides which healthcare providers are in the schools.

I note that over in Europe, they are struggling with this topic as well. Apparently Sweden and England are limiting some available medical interventions to change a person's sex. England's Health Service just came out with its latest Cass report and they say it is NOT clear what the future effects of puberty blockers are for children. 

There has been a similar pattern in other Western countries, with clinicians noting not only the rising number but also a change in the case mix of the young people seeking support.

There have been many more birth-registered females being referred in adolescence, marking a shift from the cohort that these services have traditionally seen; that is, birth-registered males presenting in childhood, on whom the previous clinical approach to care was based.

Clinicians also noted that these young people often had other issues that they were having to manage alongside their gender-related distress.

While a considerable amount of research has been published in this field, systematic evidence reviews demonstrated the poor quality of the published studies, meaning there is not a reliable evidence base upon which to make clinical decisions, or for children and their families to make informed choices. 

The summary is good and I'm sure the entire report goes into more detail.

Issues that I have no real answers for:

- In the classroom - say the school has a child who in first grade presented as a boy but comes back in second grade presenting as a girl. If I am a parent who has not discussed the trans issue with my child, I sure would like to know that there is an issue in my child's classroom so that my family can talk to my child about it. I would like to know that my district would basically tell students in any given classroom that "at our school we are kind and respectful to all students" but not necessarily go into detail.

- In the bathroom - From the Know Your Rights page, If nonbinary, you have the right to choose the restroom where you feel safest.  Fine but what is the school saying to its student population about this?

- In the locker room - this is one place that I have trouble because while you are trying to help the trans child's comfort, there is also the issue of the other students who are also having changing bodies and their discomfort with that. How are schools handling this issue?

- Overnight field trips - another place I see as problematic. I don't even know if kids know before the trip who is in their room. Are parents able to ask? And if one student isn't comfortable rooming with a trans student, what happens?

- Sports - this is the one where I have the biggest problem. I think the others can be worked out but not this one. I think trans students should compete on their gender birth team.

 I have tried valiantly to find something definitive on whether boys who are trans have an advantage over girls in sports. It appears that a lot of that issue is that every student may be at a different point on their trans journey than another. Meaning, some having puberty blockers and/or hormones versus those who haven't had them. 

What I have found are stories about boys who are trans on girls teams who often win over girl athletes as well as stories about girl athletes who will refuse to compete. When you are talking about high school and possibly scholarships involved, then it's a really important situation. The Know Your Rights page says: You have the right to participate as the gender you consistently assert at school. 

So that part of the SPS thinking on trans students is clear.

The takeaways:

- SPS seems to be at the forefront for services for trans students in the country so expect to hear more.

- I suspect at some point SPS will have to be more upfront with parents about how the district supports these students. 

- Will sports become the biggest fight? 

Comments

E Brandt said…
When you're talking about "news stories cropping up" from 'Parents Defending Education', be aware they're a Koch-funded group that works for 'school choice' in opposition to public school systems. When you're getting your news from the Daily Wire, Ben Shapiro's channel, stop and think why Ben Shapiro and his buds want you talking about this. And if it helps, be aware that many of these groups and their money sources explicitly target trans children as a wedge issue, with the stated intent to move on to trans adults and queer people.

Anti-trans ideologues work by getting their talking points out there so well-meaning people without personal experience think "I hear that people are raising questions about this…" By getting them to hear the word "contagion" coming up, more than they hear what psychological professionals have to say (https://www.caaps.co/rogd-statement).

If you get concrete with actual trans kids, a lot of it is simpler than these discourse-driven concerns make it feel. A kid comes back to second grade as a girl? From the parents I know whose kids came out in early elementary grades, their classmates mostly shrugged and moved on. I'm honestly puzzled what the "detail" is that you want the teacher not to go into -- this is your classmate from last year, this is her name now, you can't really say less, and what other "detail" is envisioned here? Frankly, why is there "a trans issue" here at all?

Sports were the first target of all this because it functions so well as a concern-raiser. But at the level of school sports, kids have widely varying physical capabilities, including puberty development, and that's why we sort them into multiple competition levels. We tell them it's about competition and teamwork, after all. Can we wait and see some actual concrete outcomes, like trans girls sweeping up all the lucrative Div-I field hockey scholarships, before we make a problem ourselves?

I'll leave the Cass Report aside, since it's not actually of direct relevance to school practices, but will just note that the American Academy of Pediatrics is clear that gender-affirming care saves lives.
Good points.

I should have pointed out the sources more clearly.

In my first grade to second grade example, I would say that it's great if no kid asks any question out loud. That's not my experience after years as a volunteer in a kindergarten classroom. But if there are questions, I would not want the teacher to go into any detail. I would want the teacher to say, "Ask your parents." Because while many of us support trans kids, sadly, other parents do not. But it's still their right to decide at what age their child gets an explanation. Not a teacher, not a school, not a district. Maybe I'm just old-school on this point.

I see your points on sports but you are trying to push aside real concerns. Of course, there are varying physical capabilities but that's not the point. And you want to wait until who thinks it's a problem? Not sure that is fair.

The Cass report doesn't say that gender-affirming care doesn't save lives. It speaks to the issue that the gender-affirming care and the physical effects are unclear. It's worth considering.
IAST said…
E Brandt,

That's funny you mention the wealthy individuals who are sowing the public discourse to push their agenda. The Pritzker family from Chicago has enormous investments in medical tech companies including those related to gender and reproduction. They also have donated millions to trans activist organizations through Tawani and Tides foundations, have influenced medical schools and children's hospitals to support gender affirming care, and directly funded WPATH. Other big funders of this space include George Soros, Martine Rothblatt, Tim Gill, Drummond Pike, the Buffets, and Jon Stryker. I really hope the Koch brothers aren't successful in destroying public education, but their counterparts who are funding the social engineering of gender identity and pushing it in schools, are sure making it easier for them.

Now, regardless of whether the sources in the post have an agenda, if their facts can be verified, they can be used to inform our understanding of this issue. Mainstream sources only touch this issue very tendentiously. Whenever the NYT writes something that even slightly doesn't align with the maximalist position of trans activists, they are accused of killing trans kids. The Seattle Times wouldn't touch this with a ten foot pole. Melissa has done us a favor by digging in the garbage dump of the Daily Wire to confirm that indeed, the school-supported clinics are piloting a program that can directly supply HRT to kids. That's a fact, and it doesn't matter who reported it. So the Cass report is relevant here, because the evidence for these interventions is so poor that most European countries have changed course to consider them only suitable to be used in controlled trials. Maybe, in 10 or 20 years, those trials will show something positive (although I highly doubt it).

Europeans are not more transphobic than Americans - if anything, they are much more culturally liberal than us. But they have healthcare systems that aren't driven by the prerogatives of big business. If someone is damaged by these interventions in the US, they just become someone else's problem (although we will see how some of the lawsuits play out). But in Europe, they have to be treated by the same state-run healthcare system later on.

And from my perspective, teaching kids about gender identity in schools from a young age is a like an advertisement for these interventions. This should be obvious but especially young kids don't understand the difference between pretend play and reality, even up to 1st or 2nd grade. It's so easy for a kid to become locked into an identity from a young age because they were affirmed when they were just being a kid, playing with words like kids do.
Anonymous said…
I’ll just offer that my high school students seemed to have hit their wall lately with trans positive messaging at school. They’re all in favor of supporting their friends on their own identity journeys, but a bit tired of collectively ruminating on their own in classes. Don’t want to talk about pronouns, don’t want to argue over gender inclusive language or demonstrate their progressive ideological chops during the school day. Agree that these Koch ginned up gender “conflicts” are generally quite rare (sports teams etc) but the day in, day out energy spent on this in SPS high schools may not be productive for creating the community we think we are.

Collective Neutral
Anonymous said…
We need more mental heath professionals trained in treating gender dysphoria. We know from the research Munchausen syndrome by proxy can play a part.

seek help
Many Questions said…
Melissa,

Thanks for having the courage to write this post.

I just can't get on board with introducing gender issues in K, and I would certainly want to know what is being taught in elementary school.

As one poster pointed out, one needs to look at The Pritzker family.

As you mentioned, some European countries are backing away from some treatments. The United States really needs to look at long term inpacta of gender affirming drugs- especially for adolescents etc.

dj said…
As someone who has dealt with two different SPS high schools with a trans kid, I've honestly been pretty impressed by the complete lack of drama. Kid goes by chosen name and pronouns, everyone seems pretty much fine, no real discussion or drama, have never heard from the schools or the kid about any issues.
Anonymous said…
E Brandt, are any of the reported facts incorrect or do you just not like the source? Do you only read things that are in complete ideological agreement with you? You miss a lot of important stories that way and just reinforce your biases.

There are legitimate questions around these issues and they should be openly debated. You're very dismissive of concerns biologically female athletes have about competing against and sharing locker rooms with biologically male athletes.

SPS Parent
Anonymous said…
This seems like as good a spot as any to thank Lincoln High School and SPS for providing a safe and affirming environment for my oldest to come out as trans before she was ready to come out to her dad and me.

Those were some rocky years, we didn't know what to do, and you may have literally saved her life. Today, she is wrapping up a successful sophomore year in college and thriving.

- Transparent
Anonymous said…
Trans girls are girls. Trans boys are boys. They are kids, and they need to be protected and cared for.

Teachers know how to give age appropriate answers. The concern of a kindergartener getting an inappropriate answer at school is a straw man argument meant to whip up fear, as has been applied previously about sex ed or lgbtq community members. Treating trans kids as so troubling or problematic that teachers can't discuss them as members of the community sounds like the current "don't say gay" campaigns from other states. It hurts everyone.
-mhparent

Unknown said…
Thanks for being willing to post this and the comments.

I'll second Collectively Neutral's points.

And the Pritzgers and their nonprofits are suspicious.

SP
Anna said…
European countries are often more socially conservative than the US.

That's not a good argument.

In addition, although I'm not a classroom volunteer, I do work in SPS and I personally am very happy with how inclusive and supportive the district has been when it comes to trans kids.

This post is filled with fearful straw men arguments and is very disappointing.
Anonymous said…
I just saw this relevant article about trans kids in sports. "Though he’s not against having all-girls teams, or all-boys teams in the future, Lightner said the club will never get rid of gender-inclusive teams for those who prefer it." Maybe the future (or part of it?) is sports based on skill level, not on gender.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/article/2024/may/29/trans-children-sports

--mhparent
Many Questions said…
Anonymous needs to look at the district’s progressive curriculum that begins in K.
Kevin said…
Why does SPS still have public changing rooms in 2024? Almost every student has a camera in their pocket, and a way to post things anonymously. This just seems like it’s asking for bullying.
Anonymous said…
Providers in Seattle need to take a close look at the four meta-analyses that were part of the Cass Report, and consider a hard dial-back of their recommendations for gender-affirming care for children, as many European medical societies have done. The lack of a strong research base supporting a medically-based 'affirming' model is something should be looked at across borders - because the effects of medical decisions are not somehow magically different in the U.S. If it's true that school clinics are offering puberty blockers or hormonal interventions, parents and school leaders should be highly concerned. If they are offering them with a simple sign-off by parents, without even a cursory psychological evaluation, giant alarm bells should be going off. The long-term effects of puberty blockers in otherwise healthy children are unknown; the research base is primarily children with early-onset puberty. In girls, testosterone will cause permanent changes in voice and hair growth within months. These are not drugs to be prescribed lightly or in a school clinic setting.

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Education News Roundup