Seattle Schools Bows to Parent Demand and Lifts Waitlists

 From KUOW (bold mine):

“We heard our community, and we’re supporting their wants,” said Faauu Manu, the district’s director of enrollment planning and services. “At the same time, we’re trying to really balance the rest of the schools and making sure that they have the resources they need.”

In an interview last week, Marni Campbell, who oversees school operations, enrollment, and admissions, acknowledged the district has “more work to do” in finding the right balance between stability and choice in its enrollment processes.

For now, as a short-term solution, enrollment officials are focused on moving as many students as possible off the waitlists at 10 of the district’s highest-demand option and neighborhood schools. Those include Asa Mercer International Middle, Hazel Wolf K-8, Salmon Bay K-8, and Roosevelt and Cleveland high schools, among others.

So far, Campbell says the district has offered more than 2,500 students seats in the school of their choice this year, through the choice program. The district will continue to offer some families spots at option schools through Aug. 31, but Campbell noted most waitlist movement will have occurred by the end of June.

 

How we got here

As part of the district’s school choice program, every student is guaranteed a spot at their neighborhood school. But families can apply to switch schools — to a different neighborhood school or a school with specialized learning programs.

If families don't get their choice school, they can join a waitlist.

But parents say those waitlists have not moved in recent years, even though there was physical space in many schools. That’s the basis of a formal complaint filed to the district ombudsperson in December by the Seattle Student Options Coalition, a group of parents and caregivers from 11 option schools.

The group accused district leaders of intentionally starving enrollment — which dictates how SPS allocates teachers, staff, programming, and other resources — leading to staff reductions that undermine the district’s goal of “advancing the academic success of students furthest from educational justice.”

New data shared with the school board at that meeting found that, of the more than 2,700 students who didn’t make it into their first-choice school for the 2024-25 year, about or 20% of them (450 total) either left or never enrolled in the district afterward.

In an op-ed in The Urbanist last month, Seattle School Board members Joe Mizrahi and Sarah Clark said the enrollment decline resulted in the loss of $12 million for the district.

“Each closure was estimated to save about $1.5 million per year,” Mizrahi and Clark wrote in the op-ed. “Why were we ever discussing closures when the district knew it was leaving eight times that amount on the table by ignoring families’ choices?” 

 

The Upshot

“We need to start driving and motivating and really improving the health of our district,” Manu said, adding the study “really opened our eyes to resetting and rethinking the way we do our business in general.”

Manu said she sees this moment as an “opportunity” for the district to look at high-demand choice schools and consider how they can bring those qualities to all neighborhood schools.

District enrollment officials use many factors to determine whether they can move students into the school of their choice, including whether there’s space available in the school, as well as the impact it would have on the school the student would be leaving.

Campbell warned families that all this movement will lead to more staff churn than usual this year.

 

Possible Changes

1. Going forward, Campbell said the district will consider bigger policy changes, such as revising the timeline of when families apply to switch schools. The district could start the application process in the fall, rather than in February. But, Campbell said, that has downsides: Some families may not know where they want their child to attend school so early.

2. Another change the district is considering, Campbell said, is its process for assigning staff to schools. The district currently estimates fall enrollment in February every year, then allocates staff based on that — before the choice process ends.

3. Campbell said she’d also like to improve the district’s transportation offerings for students attending option schools.

“We cannot say we’re offering choice if we’re not also committed to say that we’re going to limit barriers — like if families did want to choose a different school, but didn’t have the capacity to get there,” she said. “We need to make sure that it’s an authentic choice for everyone.”

 

Kudos to all parents who advocated and illuminated these problems with Seattle Schools' enrollment. But again, I point out that parents having been talking about these issues for years. 

SPS knew that there were students who wanted a choice school but had no transportation to get there which was a huge inequity. 

The district knew that Option Schools were very popular and yet, did nothing but sit on waitlists. 

I find it interesting that the district said nothing about space at schools which leads me to believe it never was about room for more students. 

This moving of waitlists will definitely show the district which schools are not succeeding in enrollment so it is likely some will make a closure list. Will it be schools that are near the mega-schools that they have built? Will they flail around, offering excuses as to why they would close a relatively okay school near a mega-school rather than a school that has had a steadily declining enrollment?

Boy, does this new superintendent have a lot on their plate. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
I cannot seem to find which schools will have their waitlists moved and which will not. Is it posted somewhere?
Anonymous said…
They may have also capitulated out of pure shame: they left money on the table in an enrollment crisis, and they denied options for poor kids who wanted out of their neighborhood schools. Hard to put your hand out for more funds with waitlists like these.

Face
Anonymous, the Times article named a couple like Roosevelt High and Cleveland High. And next time, give yourself a name or moniker.
Anonymous said…
IMO, it was SPS's attempt to justify having built mega schools at the over-the-top costs. And the appetite to continue doing more of those spending with little to no oversight goes without being questioned by the Board. The goal must be to traffic the enrollment into their mega schools by blocking the enrollment for the other schools.

Quiet Part
Anonymous said…
"Campbell warned families that all this movement will lead to more staff churn than usual this year."

It is amazing to me, how easily SPS "blames parents" for their own shortcomings.

What is "usual staff churn?" We have a district that implements staff cuts in February and then has a draconian October shuffle every year.

How does that compare to staff churn that would have been created by closing 20 schools.

SPS argues for "stability" constantly but yet, they don't even engage in a basic process of double confirming enrollment so that there is baseline confidence in matching enrollment and staffing.

I need a name/moniker for the above comment or will have to delete it.
Anonymous said…
Dollars/FTE are funded by kids in seats on October 10 when we have to do the statewide head count. THAT is the day the District officially knows how much money they will get. What if those waitlist kids don’t show up to the school they wanted to go to? What happens when a bunch of kids suddenly show up to option school and it dries up the neighborhood school?Therefore, there will be more churn because contracts for teachers and staff come out May 15. The waitlist is still going by that time. I mean, SPS could say to the youngest/newest staff, “You have a job it just may not be at this school.” And is that fair to teachers? Unfortunately, what is good for one group is often bad for another.

The worry is that we are seeing the resegregation of Seattle Schools — and nobody seems to care. I mean, we care as long as it doesn’t affect my child’s education in any negative way.

Bring Back Busing
Anonymous said…
Busing ended because it broke up neighborhood cohorts, and POC spent more time busing than white kids. Your scenarios don’t make any sense because exceptions to neighborhood schools are limited by capacity for option schools. Not showing up is already a risk regardless of school type, and keeping kids in the district is key to keeping it funded. And of course parents are advocating for their kids, and across the socioeconomic spectrum, families want choices.

Rankle

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Nepotism in Seattle Schools