What to Make of This Story?
The Seattle Times has an initiative called The Seattle Times Save the Free Press Initiative and its editor, Brier Dudley, wrote an opinion piece in today's Times.
An irreverent approach to journalism hasn’t limited the appeal of The Stranger, Seattle’s alternative weekly newspaper, to its audience.
But I wonder if it’s going too far, by selling an ownership stake to one of Seattle’s most powerful political organizations.
MLK Labor, a coalition of more than 150 unions, recently agreed to invest in Noisy Creek, parent company of The Stranger and The Portland Mercury.
Still, I’ve wondered since the sale whether The Stranger would become less of an independent newspaper and more of a political megaphone.
Being co-owned by MLK Labor may create that appearance. I’d feel the same if it was a group that lobbies on behalf of business.
Walkinshaw said the business side of the company is separate from the editorial side, so investors won’t influence coverage.
“I’m really not concerned about it,” he said, adding that the $50,000 investment being considered is a relatively small stake.
Okay but it begs the question:
“The question, though, is why did they buy it?” Rosenstiel said. “Did they buy it because they want to support independent journalism, or did they buy it because they wanted to have a vehicle for pressing their political agenda?”
Both, judging from MLK Labor’s resolution authorizing the investment.
It said The Stranger and Mercury are now “controlled by people with strong progressive credentials.”
It also said it’s in MLK Labor’s interest “to help ensure the continued existence and growth of The Stranger as an independent, progressive media entity that also retains its focus on issues of particular importance to the labor movement.”
For our purposes, this is the most troubling part:
In its pitch to MLK Labor, Noisy Creek said there’s a “total firewall between the business side of Noisy Creek and the news side,” said Joe Mizrahi, one of MLK Labor’s trustees who approved the investment. He doesn’t think it will influence coverage.
“Frankly, the labor council would have liked it if it was that way, if the investment meant more say over the editorial decision-making,” he said.
Mizrahi is secretary-treasurer of UFCW 3000, a union representing grocery, retail and other workers. He’s also a political candidate, running to retain a Seattle Public Schools board seat to which he was appointed last year.
The Stranger interviewed him as part of its endorsement process and the ownership stake “didn’t come up,” he said.
Three guesses who The Stranger will endorse for the District 4 race.
Mizrahi is clearly up the food chain for the union, especially if he is the person who gives quotes to the media.
Whoever interviewed him at The Stranger had to know about the MLK Labor investment in the newspaper and they didn't even state a disclaimer out loud?
Not sure what to make of this but if Mizrahi is elected, he needs to be very careful in what he votes on. He may end up needing to recuse himself more often. His votes should be based on what is best for the student of Seattle Schools, not what is the most progressive path that would serve his union.
Comments
It is safe to say that newspapers have biases. One does not need to look beyond the Gates Foundation Education Lab/ Seattle Times, MLK/Stranger and the Washington Post not endorsing a political candidate.
I'm not happy that a political candidate is a labor leader funding The Stranger. Mizrahi could have at least waited until after the election.
~ So Disgusted
So it makes sense that a guild of trade unionists would want to control the socialist organ of Capitol Hill.
If this guild can help elect Mizrahi, more tax dollars will go to public sector unions. So the $50k is a smart investment with large potential ROI.
SP
Hm
But when they make their endorsements, they sometime seem lightweight and silly. They don't seem to understand SPS issues at all. If you are running for school board and you're a social justice warrior, they love it.
I have been trying to contact them just to offer some knowledge of the current situation for SPS but no one answers. It's sad they have so much power and yet their endorsements for school board rarely address the issues.
One problem is that as people make their way down the ballot, they tend to not vote for school board or judges if they are unsure. That means that in many cases, every vote counts. And people are sometimes swayed by endorsements.
I have seen Mizrahi - in stories about his union - be quoted in the Times. Is he their regular PR person? Because I think if that is so, it will clash with many votes on the Board if he is elected.
I hope he says something publicly and/or at his campaign webpage.