Times' Superintendent Search editorial

The Times had an editorial today about the superintendent search. I have to give the Times credit. They actually said - in print - that they wished it could take place AFTER the School Board elections in the fall. I'm sure they and other power players have been tearing their hair out over this. I'll have to write a lengthier explanation on my take on School Board elections (very different from other elections) but this is a fun piece to read and certainly made me laugh out loud.

On a serious note, I do believe the Board will select one of these people. I'm not sure any of us wouldbe able to find enough wrong to convince the Board otherwise. Are we going to get the person best suited to help us find our way? I don't know. These are the 2 best people out of 39 that the Board selected. So the Times saying "We don't have to settle." isn't going to work. In already stating their case that they wished that the Board would have waited until after the elections, they have played their hand and the Board would never grant them that wish. But the main reason someone will be selected is because it's time and the Board knows it.

Comments

Charlie Mas said…
I love the irony. In 2003, following the collapse of the previous Board's Superintendent search, the Seattle Times editorialized that the then-School Board should "should hire a new firm and launch another search right away, not wait until after the November election."

See Seattle Times editorial of 10/5/2003, So far, not the right fit

The Times supported that Board and Olchefske to the bitter end.
4/5/07, 4:05 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more