Why You Should Care Mr. Crabill has found quite the acolyte in Director Chandra Hampson. In the course of discussions over SOFG, she says his name over and over, "A.J .says we...." Now that's not too surprising given the direction the district is heading and that it is Mr. Crabill's work with the Council of Great City Schools is how we got here. But it appears that Mr. Crabill is working very closely with Hampson and we know she wields some amount of power over the majority of the Board. Mr. Crabill is going to continue to work with the Board as SOFG is instituted in SPS. In fact, his role may become more public as it did at one SPS Board meeting in the spring where he was on the phone during the meeting and suggested the Board stop the meeting to "self-reflect." I also noticed that in a district in South Carolina, when things weren't going to plan, he blamed the Board for not following SOFG to the letter. Look for that to happen here if Board members w...
Comments
Sunday 19th July 2009,
from noon-2.30pm,
at 10715 Phinney Ave N, Seattle, WA 98133...
to discuss Broad Foundation and other corporate influence in the Seattle Public School District...
SPS Board Director Harium Martin Morris will attend...
All welcome, including children...
For an insight into community concerns re Broad, see:
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=28765366&postID=8474647497939761140
Also we will begin the SPS Mass Complaint Direct Action campaign.
RSVPs appreciated to 206 297 7511
If numbers necessitate, larger meeting space has been booked at the Library on Yesler Terrace... Notification of a change in venue will be sent out ASAP.
Namaste
Sahila ChangeBringer
AS#1 parent and BLT member
"This decline in both countries may reflect a poor fit between children's developing psychological needs and school settings," Wang said.
As I wrote on another thread, instead of fixing a flawed system, we say our kids are flawed...
How about taking an alternative education approach to this issue - find out what kids are really interested in, allow them to explore those topics, activities to the Nth degree and build in 'core' academics (that are present in everything anyway) into a format that nurtures their passions....
Obviously, we can't do that, but we can draw from all of the brain research that's been done in the last few decades and create a middle school program that might be more likely to keep our students engaged.
My son, some months ago, entering this adolescence shtick, burst into tears one night at dinner, and when I asked why, he said, "I don't know! My body's sad, but I'm not!"
I feel for any teacher who has to deal with this kind of irrationality. Little kids and grownups are bad enough!
I do think, however, that middle school is, sloppy as it is, a waypoint to further schooling. If kids are left behind there, it's really hard to gather them back up again.
I cant copy and paste any of the writing from this introduction to Peter Senge's Fifth Discipline, but this thinking is the difference between Broad and the SPS District's meddling in education and the core of what real education is about....
There is such an eloquent and plainly true description of what education is today and how we are raising our children...
Please go and read it....
and then come back and tell me that what's going on in SPS (and the education system generally) is OK....
No the Education system is not OK but in general is the system we call the industrialized society much better?
When I read this:
"This decline in both countries may reflect a poor fit between children's developing psychological needs and school settings," Wang said.
I thought it could also be the child's place in society.
Senge makes an interesting point that systems themselves create and then perpetuate problems.... that people dont seem to get that the system is merely a collection of people buying into a particular belief system.... that it then becomes some 'concrete' thing with a life of its own... and people dont realise they can change the system and the problems IF they change their thinking about the system and the problems...
It so simple and obvious is laughable to the point of hysteria... except for the part where one realises the incalculable damage done to individuals and the costs to society as a whole...
I wonder if its because there is a perception that biology is seen as a 'soft' (organic = feminine ) science, whereas physics, chemistry and higher math are 'hard' (manipulative = masculine) sciences...
I think its a question of stereotyping and gender-identifying more than computer and video games overuse myself
I thought we were talking about high school subjects, not college.... sociology and psychology arent available as subjects in high school, are they?
I just think that of the science subjects available in high school that might appeal to a testosterone-filled male brain, biology might be seen as 'soft'...