Orca K-8 Shelter in Place; Everything Fine and Under Control

 Update with correction from SPS:

This was a drive-by shooting at the 2900 block of S. Graham of a 15-year old boy.  It is unknown if he is an SPS student.

The victim did NOT go to Orca K-8 but a shelter-in-place occurred at 5 area schools as a precaution when the first report of a shooting occurred.  The police determined it was a drive-by shooting (and no gunman was on foot in the area) so the shelter-in-place was lifted. 

No word on the condition of the victim except that he was ambulatory and had made his way home.

End of Update

Reader Southpaw reported that Orca K-8 was sheltering in place (somewhere around 1:15 p.m.).

The issue was a person - reportedly a 15-year old - who had been shot somewhere else came to the school to see a family member.  The school likely sheltered in place as a precautionary measure.

There was no gunman at Orca.

No real info on the victim (who it is and where the person came from) but he/she is apparently alive.  This from SPD and I have a call into SPS for further information on their end. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Melissa, where did you get the information about what happened? I'm not seeing anything on SPD blotter and we (as in Orca families) are still in the dark. (Shelter in place has been lifted, BTW.)

Thanks for the info -
-southpaw
12/10/13, 2:25 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Southpaw, as I said I called SPD. I have since talked to SPS and got some further information.

No children at those schools were in any danger and no one involved in the shooting went to any school.
12/10/13, 2:41 PM
Anonymous said…
If we see SPD "Tweets by Beat" that show assaults or other violence in the same block as a school our children attend during school hours, should we then call SPD (to rule out that the violence wasn't on school property) and SPS (if the violence was on school property?)

--BlotterReader
12/11/13, 12:57 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more