This Will Revolutionize Education

So we are told.  By Edison over movies, then closed-circuit tv, then use of computers and now online learning.

This is a great video which does a good summing up at the end.

Learning is, and has always been, about connections.  How a student makes the connections in his/her brain to what is being said to now being embedded in their brains.

But most of all, it is the ability of one person - a teacher - to get those students to a place of learning. 

So the next time Bill Gates (or anybody for that matters) says, "this will change learning," you can just smile.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I have to disagree, to some extent, with the video. It may be true for many, or even most students, that they need this social component or external sources of inspiration, but there are plenty of other students who are naturally passionate about learning and internally motivated to pursue and master new material. They don't need a teacher to inspire them--they are already inspired to learn. For many of these kids, teachers actually limit their learning, because the outside learning such kids do doesn't neatly fit with the teacher's lesson plan. I don't buy the idea that learning is inherently social activity. (Unless, of course, you define social broadly, to include interaction with a book or video, which was created by another person, using a shared language of the larger population. But that's not the premise of the argument--it's more focused on live, face-to-face interaction as the mechanism for social interaction.)

For kids (and adults) with this strong internal motivation to learn, as well as kids who are working at level significantly beyond that of their peers, I think technology CAN revolutionize learning--not by virtue of animations or videos or the specific media used, but rather by revolutionizing ACCESS educational material. Sure, there have always been textbooks--but it isn't always easy to get your hands on one, and even more challenging to get a good and current one. Online access to full texts, detailed courses, etc. allows people to easily find materials that meet their own learning needs. It also makes it easier to consult a wider variety of sources, providing a richer understanding.

Online learning is not for everyone, and yes, it probably won't revolutionize the field of education as a whole. But in the battle to educate those extremely hungry minds, I'd say it IS providing a mini-revolution. It can remove the learning ceilings imposed by traditional classrooms, and allow much greater opportunities for greater depth, acceleration, faster pacing, etc. All things that our AL programs struggle with. It gives these kids options they didn't easily have before.

HIMSmom
12/4/14, 12:01 PM
Benjamin Leis said…
I don't think the author of the video would really disagree with you. He is producing educational science videos on youtube after all. His point is more systemic. Outliers and exceptions exist but for the system as a whole, I can believe that learning is a social experience and teacher's are crucial.
12/4/14, 2:34 PM
ninja said…
Thanks for sharing.I found a lot of interesting information here. A really good post, very thankful and hopeful that you will write many more posts like this one.
https://vidmate.onl
https://anydesk.vip
tubemate
8/10/18, 1:19 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more