Action Alert: Let's Get This Done

From Washington's Paramount Duty:

Please call Sen. Braun's office at (360) 786-7638, and request that 1059 (levy cliff extension) be heard at the executive session today, rather than 5607 (Republican plan for McCleary). 

"I'm calling to ask that Sen. Braun report 1059 out of committee today. It is premature to vote on 5607 when so many people have not had a chance to even read it yet, but 1059 has been well vetted and already passed by the House, and its passage is critical for our schools to plan for the future. 

Please act on 1059 today and allow at least five days for 5607."

Comments

Anonymous said…
I suspect there is no fiscal note attached to the Republican bill in part because it will do what previous levy "swap" proposals did: not only send Puget Sound tax $$$ over to the east side to prop up their districts - which honestly, I am OK with, being a die hard liberal - because all the kids in this state will be the next generation and impact our community - BUT ALSO net deprive Seattle Schools of millions of dollars of funding it now receives. This would happen either by putting a cap or rules in place about raising local funds for education, or changing the formula for distribution of dollars so radically that Seattle ends up a significant loser.

Ross Hunter (now gone) and Reuven Carlyle have in the past been helpful in sharing specific impacts of McCleary plans on Seattle. Who has a way to get Reuven or a member of our current delegation to do some fast and public crunching on the Republican plan? This is incredibly critical for Seattle. The levy cliff will be small potatoes compared to what might come to pass without this analysis, and passing the Repub plan to avoid the levy cliff and McCleary court smackdown, only to find that Seattle is devastated by funding shrinking into perpetuity, has been my biggest nightmare for the past years I've been following the issue.

EdVoter
1/31/17, 2:28 PM
alex said…
It's just going directly to voice mail for me...grrr...
1/31/17, 3:01 PM
Watching said…
SB 5067 seeks to de-regulate education. As well, SB 5067 would provide LESS funding to over 500,000 students.

House Representative Gerry Pollet is introducing a bill for free college to which I say NO. The time to fund education is NOW.

Property taxes in S. King county are going up $500-$800 per house. Where are those dollars going?
1/31/17, 5:44 PM
Watching said…
South King County will see property taxes increase 12%:

"Algona property owners will see the largest percentage increase in the total dollars paid compared to the previous year. Normandy Park owners are likely going to pay the biggest dollar difference, where the average homeowner will pay $823 more than last year."

Yes, $823.00.

http://www.kiro7.com/news/local/south-king-county-property-owners-will-see-big-increase-in-taxes/489670099

Soon Seattle will receive their property tax bill. Some Seattle property taxes are expected to rise 15%. Will these taxes be used to fund McCleary?? I doubt it.

Meanwhile, there is legislation to provide free community college. I am not of the belief that the legislature really wants to fund education.
1/31/17, 8:00 PM
Anonymous said…
Watching wrote:

" Some Seattle property taxes are expected to rise 15%. Will these taxes be used to fund McCleary??"

These taxes cannot legally be used to fund McCleary. The premise of McCleary is that the state must fund the schools. Local property taxes do not fulfill McCleary.

Those local taxes could fill the gap until McCleary kicks in.
Supposedly McCleary decision will see the state fully funding schools in 2018.

-- Dan Dempsey
2/1/17, 12:29 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more