Tentative Contract Agreement by Seattle teachers and Seattle Public Schools

As of about 10:30 pm last night, a tentative agreement has been made.  Announcement from SPS.

School will start as planned next week.

SEA membership to vote next Wednesday.

Details as they become available.

Comments

Anonymous said…


The tentative agreement proposes a 10.5 % raise, is that on the base pay or tri pay? or the full salary?

http://view.email.seattletimes.com/?qs=883bd3374f36c095c0c218eb1f34f21b20034410293335c61fb19afc07dafec6eed3771f779a7d575fc27382bb0e9f081a2dbe37e8894cef9887d8bd1ddefe7edbef2349936bec25bf0a6d6cb58ed9e6
9/1/18, 7:01 PM
Sr10 said…
Base pay.
9/2/18, 9:08 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Some teachers on Facebook don't seem too happy with the contract but it is a one-year one.
9/3/18, 4:06 PM
Anonymous said…
The SEA General Membership Meeting won't vote until Saturday.

Moriarty
9/4/18, 1:11 PM
Seattle Citizen said…
I have been told by SEA that the raise in on the full salary, base and TRI together.
So not including any changes in status (years in service or "lane change" with more college credit, etc) a person making, say, $80,000 last year (base and tri) would make $88,500 this year - 10.5% more.
9/4/18, 2:52 PM
Anonymous said…
So awesome. No healthcare for subs. While everyone else gets their 10.5%, do your best not to get sick. You won’t be finding any good subs, if you can find one at all. At least you’ll have healthcare though. Let’s not complain about WalMart.

Sub

PS. Vote No.
9/4/18, 3:48 PM
Anonymous said…
That's a huge raise. And not sustainable. In most jobs you only get a raise like that if you have taken on additional responsibilities, done something significant etc.

- Caphill Parent
9/4/18, 4:34 PM
Anonymous said…
@caphill. The raise is part of McCleary. Teachers went years without raises. Seattle’s raise is nothing compared to other districts in the area.
9/4/18, 9:21 PM
Anonymous said…
9:21. My name is .Still low.
9/4/18, 9:22 PM
Adult World said…
Teachers received a 14% raise 3 years ago. They will most probably receive an additional 10.5% increase this year. Total 3 year raise of 24.5$. They will be back next year for more.

9/4/18, 10:26 PM
Adult World said…
Over 700 teachers will be making over $100K.
9/4/18, 10:30 PM
Eric B said…
And thousands of software developers are also paid over $100K. I know which category brings more value to my daily life...
9/5/18, 3:26 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Agreed, Eric. It's like some people really don't value teachers.
9/5/18, 4:24 PM
Former Souper said…
A 10.5% salary increase will cost the district $57M. These dollars can be layered upon an existing 3 year deficit of $68M.

The proposed 10.5% salary increase will trigger layoffs.

SEA will be back next year.

Sen. Christine Rolfes, D-Bainbridge Island said last week that the Legislature shouldn’t be micromanaging local negotiations. “It’s their responsibility to have stable budgets,” she said.

Students got 4.5 school days.

Enjoy.



9/6/18, 10:37 AM
Seattle Citizen said…
Adult World -
How much per year do you think Seattle educators should make?
Is 100k too much, in your opinion?

You appear to be bemoaning these salary increases (that many people believe bring Seattle educators towards a real-world salary) but don't tell us why they should make less.

How do YOU think Seattle should attract the best teachers, when other districts pay more and have lower costs of living?
9/6/18, 12:34 PM
Adult World said…
At 10%, Seattle remains competitive with Bellevue and Lake Washington. I'm unconvinced that it is less expensive to live in Bellevue. For example, Bellevue's average home price is over $939K and the median rent for a one bedroom apartment is approximately $2K per month.

Teachers are free to seek employment in Edmonds, but Edmonds over-extended themselves and are at risk of laying off teachers. Teachers moving to Edmonds would risk loosing seniority and receiving pink slips.

The state caps high end teacher salaries at $90K. Funding models will not favor those with seniority- something I oppose. I believe future funding will push funds out of Seattle, as well.

My question is how will Seattle close a funding gap that now appears around $122M.
9/7/18, 10:14 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more