Act in Leisure, Repent for a Long Time - VOTE!
A very important read in The NY Times (try a private window if you do hit a firewall). I'll put in the basics. But here's what's important:
Croydon’s experience resonated well beyond its borders, receiving substantial regional news coverage. It became a cautionary tale for these times — or, perhaps, a reflection of them.
“As citizens we have many rights, but we also have obligations,” said Wayne Lesperance, a political science professor at New England College, in Henniker, N.H. “And when we don’t fulfill our obligations, we often end up with results we don’t like.”
Here's the story:
To understand what happened — and is happening — in Croydon, you should remember the New Hampshire motto: “Live Free or Die.” This is, after all, the only state that does not require adults to wear seatbelts.
You also should know that New Hampshire’s individual-rights vibe, along with its small population (1.38 million) and large legislature (400 representatives and 24 senators), has drawn libertarians like colonists to a tea party.
Libertarians. Sigh.
On a snowy Saturday this past March, the 2022 meeting began in the two-century-old town hall, where the walls are adorned with an 1876 American flag made by the “women of Croydon” and instructions to reset the furnace to 53 degrees before leaving.
Residents approved the town budget in the morning. Then they turned in the afternoon to the proposed $1.7 million school budget, which covers the colonial-era schoolhouse (kindergarten to fourth grade) and the cost of sending older students to nearby schools of their choice, public or private.
This is when Mr. Underwood, 60, stood up and threw a sucker punch to the body politic.
Calling the proposed budget a “ransom,” he moved to cut it by more than half — to $800,000. He argued that taxes for education had climbed while student achievement had not, and that based in part on the much lower tuition for some local private schools, about $10,000 for each of the town’s 80 or so students was sufficient — though well short of, say, the nearly $18,000 that public schools in nearby Newport charged for pupils from Croydon.
In pamphlets he brought to the meeting, Mr. Underwood asserted that sports, music instruction and other typical school activities were not necessary to participate intelligently in a free government, and that using taxes to pay for them “crosses the boundary between public benefit and private charity.”
However,
The pamphlet did not note that its author was a 1979 graduate of the public high school in Chesterton, Ind., where he starred on the tennis team, ran track, played intramural sports and joined extracurricular activities in math, creative writing, radio and student government. Also: National Honor Society member, National Merit finalist and valedictorian.
The budget-slashing amendment passed, 20 to 14.
The shocking budget cut meant that the school board suddenly had to craft a new financial plan, while many parents suddenly had to come up with thousands of dollars to keep their children in public schools.
Can you imagine if SPS had half the money to run itself and had just months to figure it out?
But these people know what went wrong.
For students taking debate, as Mr. Underwood did in high school, this is an example of understatement. Many Croydon residents were livid.
But they were also chastened. They hadn’t attended the town meeting. They hadn’t fulfilled their democratic obligation. They hadn’t kept informed about the Free State movement. To some observers, they had gotten what they deserved.
And here's where the nearly across-the-board American belief in public education comes in. (Yes, we can discuss some shifts but still, about 90% of Americans send their kids to public school.)
Conservatives, liberals and those who shun labels — “an entirely nonpartisan group,” said Ms. Damon, one of the members — began meeting online and in living rooms to undo what they considered a devastating mistake. They researched right-to-know laws, sought advice from nonprofits and contacted the state attorney general’s office to see whether they had any legal options.
They did: Under New Hampshire law, citizens could petition for a special meeting where the budget cut could be overturned — if at least half the town’s voters were present and cast ballots.
On the chilly Saturday morning of May 7, Croydon residents filed into a spacious building at the local YMCA camp for their special meeting. The We Stand Up contingent needed at least 283 voters.
The turnout: 379.
The vote in favor of overturning the Underwood budget: 377.
The vote against: 2.
Don't let your kids see you lose faith in America. Model voting behavior. Fill out your ballot at the kitchen table.
Talk (carefully) to friends, relatives, neighbors and co-workers about voting.
Don't you give up.
Comments
Voter
However, as it stands right now, there is a problem that most people either don't know about or don't fully consider. As soon a Washington resident registers to vote, their personal information is made fully public. That doesn't mean it's available to request through some obscure process (which could still be a problem), it means it's freely available to anyone, online. See Sound Politics Voter Lookup. Go ahead and enter a common last name and maybe a first initial and see what pops up. First name, middle name/initial, last name, birth date, and essentially a full residential address(!) (they mask one digit, but that's easily overcome), etc.
For those of you who don't see this as a problem, please consider merely one scenario. A young woman is out with some friends, maybe at a party, maybe a club, whatever. Meets someone, shares her name, but nothing else. Decides that this person is creepy or for whatever reason doesn't want to share any more than that. Well, if she is registered to vote in the state of Washington, it's too bad, because this guy can look her up, and based on rough birth year, figure out not only her birth date (which is not just a privacy issue, but a security issue these days), but he can get her physical address, and there's nothing she can do to prevent it.
It doesn't even need to be a party, it could simply be a bouncer checking ID at a bar or club. Or a girl wearing a sports uniform with her last name, ordering a coffee and giving her first name. Or even someone simply trolling through the voter rolls for creepy kicks.
The problem with the current situation is that while there are (very cumbersome and limited) ways to opt out of being listed publicly, you can't undo what's been put put in public databases like this. You don't get to remove your address after someone has looked you up, the damage is done. It shouldn't be incumbent on every individual to go to extremes just to keep even a modicum of privacy.
I've advised my kids to consider this, and none of them have registered to vote in light of this public database, even though they are all over 18 now.
This needs legislative action to be changed. Is anyone well-connected with LWV in WA? It seems like an issue that they might have some interest in, given how it probably disproportionately affects young women (though anyone could be at risk).
Yawn
Melissa, I'm not sure this is common enough to talk about "widespread attacks", but it's definitely a problem, and to be honest, most of the time it's not going to run through law enforcement and judicial system to end up in our statistics. That's a difficult path with its own pitfalls that we ultimately didn't pursue. I guess that's part of my point of bringing this up, it's a hidden problem. Of course states need to be able to (at least attempt to) verify their voter rolls, but I'm not seeing the benefits of making those rolls fully visible to the public on the open internet. The downside isn't zero, and the problem grows over time as more data like this gets published and linked together.