Ted Howard to Return to SPS

 Tonight's Board meeting agenda has an item called "Personnel Report" and it's a listing of who is coming, going and/or rehired at SPS, from top administrative posts to all in-school postings. 

To my surprise, I see Ted Howard, former long-time principal at Garfield High School, coming in as Deputy Superintendent. This listing was effective July 1. There is no notice that the current deputy superintendent, Rob Gannon, is leaving. But it appeared to me that when Superintendent Brent Jones was named, he lured Gannon out of retirement; both had worked for King County. Perhaps it was a one-year deal all along.

Howard comes with considerable baggage and kudos from his years at Garfield. Beyond several high-profile personnel issues at Garfield, Howard also brought in the "Honors for All" program at Garfield and has not been a promoter of HCC. Hmmm.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Enrollment has declined again, so did academic standards. But that doesn't mean this district admins won't think about creating double Deputy Superintendent jobs.

Let 'em Eat the Cake
7/6/22, 4:58 PM
HF None said…
Under Ted Howard's leadership, Garfield piloted Honors for All (None). Research, Evaluation and Assessment provided a report that teachers were unable to consistently differentiate. The board and district ignored the report and moved forward with a plan to kill true Honor classes.
7/7/22, 8:15 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more