Second Seattle Times' Eye-Rolling Take (Part Two)

This article is entitled, Why Seattle Schools is hinging student success on Black male achievement.

It's not so much an article as a puff piece on how great the initiative for Black boys in SPS is. The comments seem to back this up as it doesn't even note how many Black boys there are in SPS.

One other item in the article that gets noted - the answer to the math problem in the photo at the top of the article is wrong. Oh my.

Many commenters questioned the idea of equity in math problems. The district and the article don't explain how it might be the case that math problems can house inequities.

I do agree with this:

“There is a common belief in our society that some people are math people and that other people are not,” Farmer said. “Societal beliefs impact what students can do and what educators think what students can do.”

My late husband used to wish that there was a math specialist in every elementary school to help kids get excited about math from someone who knows how to get there.

The article does point out how the district is nowhere near reaching their math and reading goals.

To reach math goals, there’s a possibility the district will have to reconsider its timeline.

You think?

Many commenters took issue with this:

But so far the climate survey has more to do with how well students think they will do in classes. And the results don’t align with the low-performing SBA scores. Based on survey results, about 82% of African American males in grades sixth through eighth either “strongly agree,” “agree” or “kind of agree” they will do well in any math classes they take.

It's great to go into a class believing you can do the work but the outcomes are not there. Maybe the district should ask those kids, "Why do you think you'll do well?"

The article talks about the schools where they are pushing these efforts but doesn't mention that Southshore K-8 gets a million dollars a year more than any other school in the district and STILL hasn't raised scores.

What is weird about the article is that it twice links to two educational sites that are selling curriculum and consulting.

This sentence was intriguing:

The district has also replaced 30 books for elementary students with ones that better reflect the diversity of the school and community.

Which books got replaced?

I wish the Times' reporting on education was not so all over the place but again, if the Gates Foundation is funding most of it, then yeah, this is what you get.

Comments

Anonymous said…
OMG being a “leader” on lifting folks up with an incorrect math problem makes our district look like such buffoons. Why on earth should anyone fund this program with outcomes like this? Perhaps the aim is to deliver subpar education in which, level unlocked!

Clown Car

Anonymous said…
When I saw this online yesterday my first thought is that they've retained consultants who are trying to help them get ahead of the PR nightmare that is likely to result from the particular schools they are going to decide have to be closed as a result of their own budgetary incompetence.

Sign me,

A longtime observer with no skin or kids in this ridiculous game....
Anonymous said…
SPS is always chasing fads in math. My sons were completely confused by the discovery methods, which were story problems pretending to be math. They would have done much better with direct instruction math.

Now it is all about equity and race. No wonder families are leaving.

District watcher
Anonymous said…
I'm overall supportive and not too critical yet that the numbers haven't improved. We've had a pandemic - so the fact that numbers have gone from 30% in 2019 of black boys scored proficient or better in reading but in 2022 32% were proficient feels like not a bad result. Students have lost a year in ability due to the pandemic - objective measures by folks who study this. So for our students not to have had this slide honestly is a win. This is quite an at-risk population. That they now feel confident in math is itself a win. Let's give the program a chance to show tangible improvement over the next few years.

Usually I'm a stickler for numbers and outcomes, but here I'm willing to provide some grace. I think its actually quite impressive that so many are enjoying their studies and feel confident in their abilities.

I'm all for continuing this focus on AA boys and young men.

The problem I'm seeing is not this focus, but rather the dumbing down of the rest of the curricula to reduce the disparity optics. Let's not hurt other students to make the optics of disparity go away. We have 9th graders doing calculus. They are capable. Let's not discourage it. SPS middle schools now no longer allow non HCC kids to accelerate in math. How idiotic. Serves no purpose and understandably parents are leaving the district exactly because of this (I'm sure others are leaving for a variety of other reasons but I know parents leaving because of this obstacle to advancement for students who are up for the challenge).

So let's give some grace to SPS for its focus on AA boys and young men.

But also, SPS, let's not enact stupid policies that hurt accelerated students and in the end, all students as more and more parents opt out of SPS.

BLUE SKY
Anonymous said…
SPS didn’t start racism. And SPS can’t fix it. By focusing on a problem it cannot fix, SPS ensures a never ending excuse for more and more money and more jobs for adults. The “fix” for the problem is both beyond reproach and beyond its capabilities. So, it’s ideal. Can SPS create equal home lives, equal jobs and wealth for families, or equal treatment in society? That’s where most of a student’s time and experience derives from. By focusing on equal outcomes SPS ensures it’s ability to always have a just platform in need of more funding.

Moolah
Question said…
Blue Sky,

The district is pouring approximately $26M into the Strategic Plan. At what point do you think the district should get results.
Anonymous said…
"SPS didn’t start racism"

Ask an Asian parent today if that's true.

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors