Second Seattle Times' Eye-Rolling Take (Part Two)
It's not so much an article as a puff piece on how great the initiative for Black boys in SPS is. The comments seem to back this up as it doesn't even note how many Black boys there are in SPS.
One other item in the article that gets noted - the answer to the math problem in the photo at the top of the article is wrong. Oh my.
Many commenters questioned the idea of equity in math problems. The district and the article don't explain how it might be the case that math problems can house inequities.
I do agree with this:
My late husband used to wish that there was a math specialist in every elementary school to help kids get excited about math from someone who knows how to get there.
The article does point out how the district is nowhere near reaching their math and reading goals.
You think?
Many commenters took issue with this:
But so far the climate survey has more to do with how well students think they will do in classes. And the results don’t align with the low-performing SBA scores. Based on survey results, about 82% of African American males in grades sixth through eighth either “strongly agree,” “agree” or “kind of agree” they will do well in any math classes they take.
It's great to go into a class believing you can do the work but the outcomes are not there. Maybe the district should ask those kids, "Why do you think you'll do well?"
The article talks about the schools where they are pushing these efforts but doesn't mention that Southshore K-8 gets a million dollars a year more than any other school in the district and STILL hasn't raised scores.
What is weird about the article is that it twice links to two educational sites that are selling curriculum and consulting.
This sentence was intriguing:
The district has also replaced 30 books for elementary students with ones that better reflect the diversity of the school and community.
Which books got replaced?
I wish the Times' reporting on education was not so all over the place but again, if the Gates Foundation is funding most of it, then yeah, this is what you get.
Comments
Clown Car
Sign me,
A longtime observer with no skin or kids in this ridiculous game....
Now it is all about equity and race. No wonder families are leaving.
District watcher
Usually I'm a stickler for numbers and outcomes, but here I'm willing to provide some grace. I think its actually quite impressive that so many are enjoying their studies and feel confident in their abilities.
I'm all for continuing this focus on AA boys and young men.
The problem I'm seeing is not this focus, but rather the dumbing down of the rest of the curricula to reduce the disparity optics. Let's not hurt other students to make the optics of disparity go away. We have 9th graders doing calculus. They are capable. Let's not discourage it. SPS middle schools now no longer allow non HCC kids to accelerate in math. How idiotic. Serves no purpose and understandably parents are leaving the district exactly because of this (I'm sure others are leaving for a variety of other reasons but I know parents leaving because of this obstacle to advancement for students who are up for the challenge).
So let's give some grace to SPS for its focus on AA boys and young men.
But also, SPS, let's not enact stupid policies that hurt accelerated students and in the end, all students as more and more parents opt out of SPS.
BLUE SKY
Moolah
The district is pouring approximately $26M into the Strategic Plan. At what point do you think the district should get results.
Ask an Asian parent today if that's true.