Got Ballot?

Seattle friends, please consider voting for these people for Seattle School Board. The Board is coming into a time of shrinking enrollment, a new governance system that weakens the Board oversight and closing schools.

D1 - DEBBIE CARLSEN (the incumbent, Liza Rankin, talks a good game but she sides with staff most of the time; she is not an effective leader). Debbie is bright and would bring non-profit experience and diversity to the Board.

D2 - Hard to say because of the lackluster campaigns from both candidates (there are only 2 so they were not in the primary). The incumbent, Lisa Rivera Smith, is bright but easily cowed and this is a time for strength. Her opponent, Christina Posten, is a former SPS principal/teacher, very bright but also somewhat scattered.

If I were voting, it would be a reluctant vote for Lisa Rivera Smith.

D3 - VOTE FOR BEN GITENSTEIN. He is a fantastic choice - bright, knowledgeable, with leadership skills in place. His opponent, Evan Briggs, does not know the district and is an acolyte for the person currently holding this position, Chandra Hampson. This is the same Hampson who sued the district over an independent investigation finding that she harassed, bullied and intimidated two senior staffers. Anyone aligned with Hampson is not to be trusted.

VOTE BEN!

D6 - You don't really have a choice here as the leading candidate, GINA TOPP received nearly 80% of the primary vote. She works in King County and is very bright and thoughtful. That said, she's a dark horse in terms of what she thinks about SPS. She has a "I want to be a team player" attitude which is great but we need people who will stand up and be counted (when it counts).

Comments

Anonymous said…
"bright but easily cowed" is such an apt description of Lisa Rivera Smith.

Seattle voter
10/22/23, 11:29 AM
Anonymous said…
I'm not super excited about any of the candidates, to be honest--but I just DO NOT understand the support and endorsements for Evan Briggs. She clearly has no relevant experience or qualifications to potentially oversee a large district like SPS while the other candidates all have some form of experience within larger institutions/organizations. And I get that she's gonna be championed by Chandra Hampson supporters, but I still don't understand the reasons for all this fawning endorsements from places like Progressive Voters Guide and The Stranger. I must admit I'm pretty concerned that the general voting public who do not have personal stakes in SPS or follow SPS-related education issues/debates (progressive and young but childless voters, for example) will simply assume that she's got the "right" kind of politics and vote for Briggs regardless.

--Another SPS Voter
10/22/23, 3:12 PM
Amanda F said…
I think the Progressive Voters Guide largely follows the views of its "partners". So if the Stranger and another source like one candidate, that's whom they're going to recommend. The Stranger likes a certain type of progressive candidate--one who will talk a lot about DEI, and who was for extended school closures. They have a very particular view of SPS, especially in the last few years.
10/23/23, 6:04 AM
HowzIt Going said…
The Stranger and Progressive Voters guide are running the district into the ground. Ignore their recommendations!
10/23/23, 9:00 AM
Anonymous said…
Agree Amanda, and shame on a town that “follows the science” and other such ideological drivel. At this point incumbents need to prove why, over the last four disastrous years, they have earned the right to stay at the table.

Next
10/23/23, 9:07 AM
Anonymous said…
the only thing i want to know is candidates position on school closures, which isn't mentioned.
10/27/23, 6:34 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more