The District Either Knows and Doesn't Care or Didn't Consider Their Actions Carefully

From the Cascadia Elementary School PTA (Cascadia is an HC cohort school) - this via Facebook (bold mine):

Cascadia Parents,

We need your help with VERY important advocacy. 

On November 15, 2023, the Superintendent of Seattle Public Schools announced no school closures, no boundary changes, and no programming changes for the 2024-2025 school year. This is contradictory to the decision that the Advanced Learning department took in the fall to stop identifying kindergartners as Highly Capable (i.e., a program change), which means that there will be no Grade 1 Highly Capable cohort at Cascadia next year. 

The Advanced Learning department's decision to stop identifying kindergartners was based on the District’s OLD plan (put forward for two consecutive years) that included a boundary change for 2024 - 2025. The boundary change would have meant that neighborhood children would have attended first grade at Cascadia next year. With the Superintendent’s announcement that there will be no boundary changes, we are now faced with a situation where we simply will not have any Grade 1 students in Fall 2024.

Allowing these decisions to proceed would mean our new school building would be even less utilized, teachers at our school will lose their jobs, and our funding will be negatively impacted. 

Our concern is that this is a result of one hand not knowing what the other hand is doing, and we need to apply pressure to get this remedied. Given the Superintendent’s announcement (no boundary changes, no program changes), we are asking that the Advanced Learning department:

  1. reverse its decision, send out consent forms to kindergarten parents ASAP, and start the process for identifying HC children to attend Cascadia/Decatur next year - and/or
  2. provide some other mechanism so some neighborhood or other students can attend Grade 1 or Kindergarten at Cascadia next year.

No matter what plan they go with, it makes no sense for a large, brand new school to have no first graders next year. Below is the contact info for the Superintendent, Advanced Learning department, and various school board members. Email all of them, as many as you can. Our kids are getting lost in the shuffle and being overlooked, and we need the District to pay attention.

Do I think this is the result of one hand not knowing what the other hand is doing? Nope.

They knew when they made that announcement what it might mean to some programs at some schools. But chaos is SPS' MO. 

I suspect from the district's viewpoint that it just hurries along their HC changes. If those kindergarteners who would have been at Cascadia for 1st grade, just stay at their home school, well, that's fewer kids to shift around later. 

And the PTA is right - their school will really be impacted if this goes through.

The PTA urges parents to write to the SPS customer service/Advanced Learning/Board. Well, none of those people can or will do anything. Because of SOFG, this is a superintendent decision and the Board can do nothing. Even if it's just a bit of a sneaky sleight-of-hand by the district. 

But let's just see what happens.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Oops! We did a half assed job and suddenly enrollment has tanked and families are mad. Yeah the Sup has all the discretion, but why would anyone want to lead like this?

Charter Sharks
Anonymous said…
Wow. That is some serious "incompetence". If it happens, I assume that has long term implications for years to come, because when they do make boundary changes, there will not suddenly be full classes of whatever grade that is moving to the school (unless I'm missing something here). That is just really astonishing.

Almost Homeschooling
Sad Parent said…
According to a recent Seattle Times article there were supposed to be 60,000 students in the district by now. Instead there were 51,000 this year. 9000 students have decided to go elsewhere.

My guess is that leadership knows about the problem at Cascadia and it was a conscious decision.

I'm not being snide. That's what I actually believe. The district wants the HCC program gone. I don't think they will extend the program. And they are not redoing boundaries this year. This would appear to be the new plan.





Anonymous said…
District Reformers: PTAs shouldn’t be about money, but advocacy
Cascadia PTA: Let’s advocate for the district to show their work on why they’re shutting down services for advanced students
District Reformers: Not like that…

Weaponized bureaucracy is a bad look.

Daylight

Anonymous said…
The real question that should be asked, even if no other schools are closed in 2024-25: Why isn't the District consolidating all north-end HC cohort grades in Cascadia? October 2023 enrollment is: Cascadia - 455 (105 in Gr5), and Decatur 188 (54 in Gr5). Cascadia was built to house about 660 students.
- Save Money!
Anonymous said…
They don't care, especially since it's the HCC schools. I've never believed the district's plan to slowly sunset those programs...I just assumed they would do a year or so of a pilot and then just say it makes more sense for space, capacity, everything is going well, etc and just end it. I don't actually believe they've don't any meaningful pilot and cannot understand how OSPI hasn't called them out on their complete lack of any actual advanced programming, but shutting it all down has clearly been the plan for a long time.

What I really cannot understand now is the current direction on facilities. The Decatur space is very old and clearly not needed now, so closing that out makes sense. But Cascadia is very new (for SPS) and does not make sense to underutilize. This goes along though with planned renovations and expansion. Rainier Beach is being massively overbuilt (are they planning to close Cleveland and hope those kids don't bail for charters/private schools?). Both Alki and Sacajawea are planned for enormous overbuilds despite the space restricted, very inaccessible locations. They're putting capacity in odd spots and leaving many areas still with schools in horrible condition. I think a lot is based on the way they did equity tiering, but it looks to me like it's going to create a lot of weird long term issues.

NE Parent

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Who Is A. J. Crabill (and why should you care)?

Upcoming Seattle School Board Candidate Forum