Seattle School Board Meeting, May 22, 2024

Update

There are four directors present - Rankin, Briggs, Topp, Mizrahi. Rankin referenced two who were remote ( Sarju and Clark) and I guess Hersey is out.

They had technical problems with public testimony so it started late. Rankin went on and one about "legally required public testimony" but they didn't have to answer anything. She also said the vote at the last meeting on the Superintendent's Plan was NOT for the plan but for "receipt" of a coming plan. 

Seriously?

Public testimony was certainly jaw-dropping. Just as Rainier View Elementary has real and severe administrative problems so does Pathfinder K-8. Speaker after speaker, some were children, some were adults reading anonymous testimony from teachers who feel unsafe - it's a horror story. One child, who said they were 9 years old last year, had to stop another child from killing themself in a classroom! In another classroom, a student was acting out sexually against other students. One speaker said there had been 40 incidents in one kindergarten class. The last speaker summed it up by saying that they have asked for consultations, for meetings and now "we are asking for change." There is an overtone of race as the principal is Black and that was met head-on. It appears

How does the district let things get this bad? What are they paying the overseers of each region for if not to address these kinds of issues? 

There were also speakers on Native Education who said that, in the past, there were bi-annual meetings with staff and Native leaders on Native Education as well as community engagement with the Native Community by superintendents but no more. 

There were several speakers standing up for Laurelhurst Elementary and frankly, it was not the usual suspects I expected. Laurelhurst used to have this tony, country-club like feel but not now. These were down-to-earth parents who talked about belonging for their children including bi-racial kids and Special Education students.

Consent agenda went through with no issues. Well, I have an issue and it's that I DID go check about the BTA V elevator item which says:

The Dover Elevator Modernization project, located at Adams Elementary, Bryant Elementary, Coe Elementary, Franklin High School, Hawthorne Elementary, John Hay Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Thurgood Marshall Elementary, and Wedgwood Elementary schools, is funded through the Buildings, Technology, and Academics/Athletics (BTA) V Capital Levy, passed by the voters in February 2022

I checked and elevator repair is NOT in BTA V. So to say again, when you vote for a school levy, you are voting for a POT OF MONEY.  Apparently because the district cut facilities staff, they can't do the work themselves so they have to contract it out and are taking a lump of money from BTA V for it. But that means, some other facilities work isn't going to get done.

Topp asked about talking about the Guardrails now. Rankin stutters around and Jones is not there. Oh my. But Topp says okay. What the hell are they there for? Now they are talking about community outreach speaking engagement scheduling. Because that's the most important district business. 

I cannot take these people seriously. 

end of update and end of meeting (before 7 pm which seems a record)


 Here's the agenda. I don't know why but "how to testify," which is normally at the top of the agenda, is not there. I believe you can now only register by computer, instead phone/computer.

The State Auditor's office does regular reviews of various areas of district operations. 

This report contains the results of our independent accountability audit of Seattle School District
No. 1 from September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2023

Use of restricted funds– professional learning and local revenue for enrichment
activities
• Compliance with supplemental contracts for enrichment activities
• Student enrollment reporting – basic education
• Self-insurance with unemployment and workers compensation
• District vehicles and fuel cards – compliance with District policy
• Procurement – public works and cooperative purchases
• Accounts payable – procurement card

• Open public meetings – compliance with minutes, meetings, and executive session
requirements
• Financial Condition – reviewing for indications of financial distress 

No laughing at that last one.

Next up in December, 2024 are:

- accountability for public resources

- financial statement

- federal programs

That should be fascinating reading.

I won't got through the entire report here but will report any important findings in a separate post. 


Public Testimony

Huge list with 25 scheduled speakers and a waitlist of 31 people.

Most of the speakers are divided between well-resourced schools/closure as well as issues at Pathfinder K-8. I had heard that school has similar complaints as Rainier View Elementary about their own principal. 

I see some familiar names on the list including Sarah Sense Wilson, a prominent leader in Native education, former school board candidate, Debbie, Carlsen, and former school board director Lisa Rivera,.


Consent Agenda

This looks fairly routine except for one BTA V item which is a change order for "the Dover Elevator Modernization project at nine school sites" in the amount of $862,117.38 (plus sales tax). Elevators in schools are vital for students with mobility challenges.

Apparently, several of the Dover elevators that the district has in buildings are "obsolete" and no longer have parts available to fix them. The district says if any of them stop working, it would be months until they could get a new elevator delivered and installed. That would mean rerouting classes to accommodate those who need the elevators. They would like to finish these projects by August 2024.

The schools affected are all elementaries except for Frankin HS: Adams, Bryant, Coe, Frankin, Hawthorne, John Hay, Olympic View, Thurgood Marshall and Wedgwood. (One interesting side note is the both Thurgood Marshall and Olympic View are Tier 3 schools.)

The district says there is a modernization project for the elevators via BTA V (I'd have to go and check if that project is actually in there.) 

Here's the wording that struck me:

Due to district Facility Operations resources being allocated elsewhere, SPS can no longer self-perform the electrical, fire alarm and HVAC work that was originally omitted from the proposals. This is the fundamental cause of the change order.

Where were those resources directed to? Does that mean that Facility Operations lost staff due to budget cuts?  And why is the change order only available "upon request?" 

And that does it for real district business. 


Then the Board will be navel-gazing ("self-evaluation") and then they will examine "Progress Monitoring."  

Under "Progress Monitoring, " there is Guardrail 4 - Discipline.

Viewing the report, you can see some good news and some hard to quantify news. The good news is that the number of Special Education students with discipline incidents is steadily going down, from a high of 11.3 per 100 students in 2018-2019 to 5.4 in 2023-2024. 

But the the rate for all students has bounced around but appears to be dropping somewhat, with the 2018-2019 number of 3.6 to this year's number of 2.5.

They are also going to examine Guardrail 5 - Safe & Welcoming

The news on this guardrail is not good. The really bad story is that their goal of AA males in 3-12th grades who attend 90% or more of the school year will increase from 60.1% in June 2021 to 65% in June of 2023-2024 did not happen.

But reading on, I see that the attendance rate for AA male students "decreased significantly from the baseline of 2020-21 (60.6%) to 2023-24 (46.7% Year-to-Date as of 4/4/2024). 

Comments

NESeattle said…
Curious to know if anyone has any information on the board personnel report regarding Nathan Hale AP Jessica Proctor? Report shows a resignation date of 6/30 and I am hearing she is “on leave” until then. She ruffled a lot of feathers (to put it mildly) at Roosevelt for several years in the same role before moving to Hale. Sounds like some things never change……until they do.
Anonymous said…
I only caught the portion of the meeting in which Liza Rankin waved around a report from 1990 showing many of the same problems with enrollment, leadership churn and equity we have today. Such is the state of public schools, so why must she chastise the audience for not owning their part of the problem…Why is she like this? What does she ask families to do, specifically, and why won’t she model what taking accountability looks like? She is deliberately failing to connect the dots between her own actions — approving an expensive teacher contract, doing away w HCC, COVID closures — and the financial/enrollment mess we see today. That whole presentation was very scold-y and what does she think it achieves?

Could we get a little more vision, please?

Resigned
Resigned, sadly Rankin did that again at last night's meeting. Just before public testimony, she had a lecture on what they will and will not do. I do believe she is being pushed (a little) to do this, probably by SOFG guru, AJ Crabill. The achievement is to beat back any pushback.

That's a good question that Lisa Rivera also asks - what does the district and Board want from parents during this process (except to be cheerleaders for it and good luck with that).

But speaking of cheerleaders, I'm hearing that the Alliance for Education has gotten in the act trying to gin up support for the Superintendent's someday-to-be-revealed Plan.
Anonymous said…
Anonymous Coward Asks,

How are there no parts available for the elevators? The Master contract with Eltec, who was sourced through the state, requires that Eltec has all parts on hand to immediately repair the elevators. They are being paid $250K a year for doing just that.

Is the replacement elevators being done by the builders Skanska? Skanska is the developer who was just green lighted to build a new elementary, to replace Sacajawea, in Maple Leaf. Sacajawea currently school that has 126 students A number far less then what the well resource mandate is declaring viable ?

According to the district report the current school has a capacity of 500 students, the last time the school housed that many students was 1961. The school has chronically dealt with under enrollment.

Anonymous Coward, I think the issue - as stated in the BAR - on the elevators is this:

"Due to district Facility Operations resources being allocated elsewhere, SPS can no longer self-perform the electrical, fire alarm and HVAC work that was originally omitted from the proposals. This is the fundamental cause of the change order."

I take that to mean staff cuts. Maybe you know something else.

Where did you read they are replacing Scajawea? Because they are not. The district HAS spend BEX dollars on planning for it but it's not going to happen.
Pathfinder parent said…
The issues at Pathfinder are greatly exaggerated, histrionics notwithstanding. More and more parents are starting to look closer at the picture being painted and finding reasons to be skeptical. Wasn't the kid who engaged in unwanted touch expelled?
Anonymous said…
If anything, there's more issues at Pathfinder than discussed. Sizable numbers of families and teachers left last year and will again this year at significant cost to themselves. Do you think they move, change jobs, pay for unplanned and expensive private schools, hire expensive legal help, alter social circles because of some exaggerations, misunderstandings, race, or any other excuse the administration or others try to use? They do it because there are significant issues impeding their kids getting a reasonable education, plain and simple. Some don't have those options, so they fight.

I see that the principals only prior administrative experience was as a vice principal for one year... during Covid mind you... before becoming a principal for the first time. Incompetence is hardly a stretch from that alone.

On top of that, there's over 350 signatures on the most recent letter, but sure, Pathfinder just happens to have families that are especially gullible, easily manipulated, or get kicks out of spending time writing letters, showing up at the board meeting, fielding threats, faking signatures, etc. I mean what SPS family doesn't have that kind of luxury time? /s Back your "exaggerations" and "skepticism" with data. Show me the fake signatures. The families emailed the district and admin widely with all the names they can easily verify. All I see from the administration side and her supporters are words. The parents looking for change are showing action.

If you are truly a parent, please consider yourself blessed if it hasn't impacted you. I'm happy for you and hope you continue to go unscathed. But maybe before assuming your experience is broadly shared, rather than try to tear these families down and impede their efforts, reach out to them. They've been very open and transparent, putting everything on their website and documenting everything along the way. Meet some for a coffee or something and I assure you it won't take long to see there are real impacts and harm being done.
Pathfinder parent said…
Skepticism is ultimately a pursuit of what is most true, not a personal attack. Pathfinder Families has set the stakes at a level that warrants a detailed and objective review of all claims, while simultaneously driving a process that seems to ask the community to quickly accept and support their one-sided accounts. The burden of proof is on the side crying crisis, but I have been asking questions and finding the details less alarming and more nuanced than they are represented to be. Pathfinder is not a geozoned school, so any parent could conceivably opt back into their local school without moving or changing jobs if this school and principal are so abnormal.
Pathfinder parent said…
I think the 350 signatures include some who took what has been said on faith in part because the people directly involved are trying to spark outrage and moral outrage is something we are all susceptible to, as well as some who do not have children at Pathfinder today whose motivations may be unsavory.
I would offer that like Rainier View Elementary, SOMETHING is wrong. The district pays the Regional Executive Directors to oversee schools in their area. For Pathfinder K-8, it's Chris Carter.
cecarter@seattleschools.org

For Rainier View ES, it's Katria Hunt
kmhung@seattleschools.org

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors