"Education Program Reduction" on the Board Agenda

 Just throwing this up quickly.

One item on the agenda that was a bit of a mystery was the BAR called Education Program Reduction per Board Policy 0060. Basically it's a resolution by the Board when there are significant financial issues in the district and that the Board okays certain measures. Below is the important part:

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,

That the Seattle School Board of Directors directs the Superintendent to present a plan for balancing the budget for 2025-26 with the goal of transitioning to sustainable financial plans that aligns general fund expenditures with reasonably anticipated revenues in compliance with Board Policy No. 0060;


1. The Superintendent is directed to prioritize on-going solutions in the development of the
preliminary budget proposals for 2025-26 fiscal year;


2. These proposals may include some or all of the following on-going solutions:

 • Operational savings from the transition to a system of Well-Resourced
Schools
• Transportation changes
• Reducing, eliminating, or pausing programs
• Salary and/or benefit reductions for staff
• Central office reductions
• Implementation of fees
• School staffing reductions


3. The preliminary balanced budget proposals shall be presented to the Board on or around
January 22, 2025;

4. The preliminary balanced budget proposals shall include a scenario in which the District
receives no additional funding from the Legislature in the state’s adopted 2025-2027
biennial operating budget; 

5. The preliminary balanced budget proposals shall align with the goals and guardrails that
prioritize the critical functions of the District in pursuit and accomplishment of outcomes
for students, and that must guide what reductions in the District’s operations and
educational programs are made; 

6. The Superintendent is directed to continue to work with the Board to explore legislative
solutions; 

7. The Superintendent will take such action as may be required by law, collective
bargaining agreements, and Board policy to implement the plan, including notifying
employees who will be affected by the implementation of the Reduced Educational
Program; 

8. The Superintendent will, prior to the introduction of the 2025-26 District operating
budget in a Regular Meeting of the Board, update the Board on any significant variations
in necessary program reductions if the adopted Washington State 2025-27 biennial
operating budget results in a significantly different level of revenue for the District than
anticipated

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

Who Is A. J. Crabill (and why should you care)?

Why You Should Care Mr. Crabill has found quite the acolyte in Director Chandra Hampson. In the course of discussions over SOFG, she says his name over and over, "A.J .says we...." Now that's not too surprising given the direction the district is heading and that it is Mr. Crabill's work with the Council of Great City Schools is how we got here. But it appears that Mr. Crabill is working very closely with Hampson and we know she wields some amount of power over the majority of the Board. Mr. Crabill is going to continue to work with the Board as SOFG is instituted in SPS. In fact, his role may become more public as it did at one SPS Board meeting in the spring where he was on the phone during the meeting and suggested the Board stop the meeting to "self-reflect." I also noticed that in a district in South Carolina, when things weren't going to plan, he blamed the Board for not following SOFG to the letter. Look for that to happen here if Board members w
Read more