Director Martin-Morris Community Meeting

Director Martin-Morris is hosting a community meeting tomorrow on August 9 at 10:00 at the Northeast Branch Library, 6801 35th Ave. N.E.

You should go.

You should go and ask the Director about seriously he takes the issue of sexual harassment. Never mind what he says; let's take a look at what he has done.
He didn't bother to enforce the Sexual Harassment Policy 3208. It calls for an annual report, but the first annual report is about 18 months overdue. Did he ever ask for it? If not, why not? Doesn't he take sexual harassment seriously enough to read the policy on it? If he did ask for it, then why didn't he get it?  Is that what it looks like when the Board takes the issue of sexual harassment seriously? Is he going to ask for it immediately now?

He sits on the Audit and Finance Committee and has received quarterly reports called Corrective Action Reports that showed how Paul Apostle never even started to address any of the audit findings assigned to him. Among them, one that dealt with how the District handles sexual harassment charges. Instead of holding Mr Apostle accountable, the Audit and Finance Committee and Director Martin-Morris simply extended the deadline for Mr. Apostle to take action. From four months to one year and then to two years. Is that what it looks like when the Board takes the issue of sexual harassment seriously? Is he going to demand that these tasks be completely immediately now?

As a member of the Audit and Finance Committee Director Martin-Morris was in receipt of the Comprehensive Program Review from the OSPI. Among the findings on that Review was one that called for a review and revision of the Sexual Harassment policy and procedure. In the District's response, they commit to updating the policy and procedure by July 1, 2014. That was three weeks ago, but no such update has been done. Is that what it looks like when the Board takes the issue of sexual harassment seriously? Is he going to review and revise the policy immediately now?

Director Martin-Morris was one of the Board member who heard the appeal of the Garfield rape decision. The superintendent concluded that no sexual harassment had occurred. Perhaps Director Martin-Morris can explain how the superintendent was able to reach that conclusion and how he was able to reach it as well. Even the most generous reading would only allow him to say that it isn't possible to reach any conclusion. The boy's own testimony, however, confirms that he violated the policy against unwanted touching, so a more balanced view would be that there was sexual harassment. But there is no way that anyone could definitively determine that there was no sexual harassment. How did the superintendent do it and how did the Board support that conclusion?

Whether there was sexual harassment in that case or not, it is an undeniable objective truth that the district staff did not follow the policy and procedures following a charge of sexual harassment. Is that what it looks like when the Board takes the issue of sexual harassment seriously? How is Director Martin-Morris holding staff accountable for their failure to follow policy and, beyond that, how is he holding them accountable for their adversarial approach to the victim and her family?

Oh yes, please do go to Director Martin-Morris' community meeting. It's a precious opportunity. Bring printouts of the documents with you.

Comments

Melissa Westbrook said…
Charlie, I think that's on August 9th. I know - reading the calendar at the SPS website can be confusing.
7/25/14, 6:05 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more