Debate the issues facing Seattle Public Schools, share your opinions, read the latest news. Organize and work for high quality public schools that educate all students to become passionate, lifelong learners.
National PTA Sponsoring Common Core Ads on Facebook
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
I would guess if you are a PTA member and on Facebook, these PTA-sponsored ads will pop up on your Facebook page.
Would be nice if someone had proofread it first.
Disappointing that National PTA is going this direction rather than having a real conversation about the issue and parents' concerns.
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Comments
Anonymous said…
That's it. I cannot give one penny to our PTA.
And yet, I want to be a member of my children's school PTA because, basically, I want to vote on the school's PTA budget. They always seems to be so dense about how to spend it... So, in the past, I have 'just' joined but with a zero donation, and instead funneled my donation directly into the classrooms (bought tons of books and supplies for the classrooms, art supplies for the PCP teacher, recorders for F&RL kids, and lots of food for the teacher's lounge). Until and unless there is an 'equalization plan' for all Seattle PTAs, I have no incentive to give directly to our PTA. (If there is equalization, then, my 'black market' dollars will come above-board, so that all schools can pool and pull together for all kids -- but that is just me. Clearly, I am an outlier.)
I grimace that even $1 of mine will funnel up the food chain to go to the national PTA. I would much rather have a PTO at our school. Less rigmarole, less politics.
Bless those who are super-supports for PTA, 'believing in the cause'. But, one can advocate powerfully for public education without the PTA infrastructure, baggage, and costs.
Sorry, but, advertising for common core? Maybe this is a mistake - and someone usurped their logo and stuck it on an ad. Hard to believe they would advocate for something so controversial and unproven. I assumed they would push for things like better quality nutrition in lunches, more money in the classroom from all levels of government, etc.
The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested. It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio. (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read). end of update Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board. To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up. But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Let's start with this disclosure: I agree with Director Geary. Here's what she said at the Board meeting on January 4, 2017 during a discussion of the CSIPs and, specifically, the description of advanced learning services in those CSIPs:
Comments
And yet, I want to be a member of my children's school PTA because, basically, I want to vote on the school's PTA budget. They always seems to be so dense about how to spend it... So, in the past, I have 'just' joined but with a zero donation, and instead funneled my donation directly into the classrooms (bought tons of books and supplies for the classrooms, art supplies for the PCP teacher, recorders for F&RL kids, and lots of food for the teacher's lounge). Until and unless there is an 'equalization plan' for all Seattle PTAs, I have no incentive to give directly to our PTA. (If there is equalization, then, my 'black market' dollars will come above-board, so that all schools can pool and pull together for all kids -- but that is just me. Clearly, I am an outlier.)
I grimace that even $1 of mine will funnel up the food chain to go to the national PTA. I would much rather have a PTO at our school. Less rigmarole, less politics.
Bless those who are super-supports for PTA, 'believing in the cause'. But, one can advocate powerfully for public education without the PTA infrastructure, baggage, and costs.
Sorry, but, advertising for common core? Maybe this is a mistake - and someone usurped their logo and stuck it on an ad. Hard to believe they would advocate for something so controversial and unproven. I assumed they would push for things like better quality nutrition in lunches, more money in the classroom from all levels of government, etc.
I wish them all well, but,
I'm out
Gates was a big donor to the PTA.
Looks like he successfully bought PTA support for Common Core.