WPD Urges Governor's Veto on Part of Budget

From Washington's Paramount Duty:
ACTION NEEDED!
Please CALL GOV. INSLEE: 360-902-4111 on Thursday, July 6! Parents are asking Gov. Inslee to veto a huge new tax cut for businesses that was created in the budget deal. 

Here’s the story: Even as legislators failed to fully fund public schools, they added a section to the funding bill (SSB 5977) that reduces the Business & Occupation Tax for manufacturers. That’s a 40% reduction in the business tax rate, and could cost as much as $40 million per year. (For perspective, the state could fully fund the Breakfast After The Bell program for just under $3 million a year.)

Please call Governor Inslee (360-902-4111) on Thursday, July 6 and ask him to veto this new tax cut. Doing so wouldn’t require vetoing anything else. This tax cut never got a hearing in the House Finance Committee — there’s no way to justify this. If you can't call on Thursday, please email the Governor using this link: http://governor.wa.gov/contact/contact/send-gov-inslee-e-message
Here is the letter that WPD sent to Governor Inslee's Chief of Staff and Director of External Affairs on Sunday, July 2.
Dear Mr. Postman and Ms. Smith:

We are writing on behalf of Washington’s Paramount Duty’s 10,000 parents and public school advocates. We urge Governor Inslee to improve the health and sustainability of the recently-approved funding for public schools by vetoing the section of SSB 5977 that reduces the Business & Occupation (B&O) Tax rate for manufacturers to 0.2904 percent from the current rate of 0.484 percent. This tax cut, costing at least $40 million per year, leaves the state government with less flexibility and resources to fund our schools, especially in the event of an economic downturn.

Both the content of the tax cut and the process by which it was included in the budget provide a strong justification for veto action.

We need only look at the State of Kansas to see the disastrous impacts of these kinds of corporate tax cuts. When the Governor of Kansas signed major business tax cuts into law, the result was a nationally-known disaster for the state's schools and even the state's economy.

We share the legislature's desire to help boost the rural economy. But we also believe one of the best ways to do that is by fully and amply funding their public schools. It may be possible that this tax break may ultimately benefit schools and rural communities. We have no way to know whether that is true, because no analysis was conducted on this proposal. There is no fiscal note.

Instead, as the Seattle Times demonstrated, this tax cut was added at the very end of secret negotiations. This tax cut is a major change to our state's revenue system. It should have been proposed, analyzed, and debated in public. Perhaps this proposal would have been a good idea as part of a larger plan of tax reform. It is not a good idea as something included at the 11th hour.

We urge you to veto the relevant section of SSB 5977 and ask the legislature to revisit the manufacturing tax cut in full public view, with rigorous analysis of the proposal and its fiscal impact, particularly on our still-underfunded public schools.

Sincerely,

Tali Rausch
President, Washington’s Paramount Duty

Summer Stinson
Vice President, Washington’s Paramount Duty

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/democrats-urge-gov-inslee-to-veto-tax-cut-for-manufacturers/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more